Northwestern Motor Car, Inc. v. Pope
Decision Date | 02 June 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 29,29 |
Citation | 187 N.W.2d 200,51 Wis.2d 292 |
Parties | , 9 UCC Rep.Serv. 445 NORTHWESTERN MOTOR CAR, INC., a Wis. corp., Respondent, v. Ronald H. POPE, Appellant. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
This is an action for damages for breach of an automobile-purchase contract.
In its complaint, plaintiff alleges that on or about July 7, 1969, the defendant executed a contract to purchase from plaintiff a 1968 Shelby GT 500 automobile and that the defendant made a deposit of $100. The complaint further alleges that on July 16, 1969, plaintiff offered delivery of the automobile to defendant but that defendant refused to accept it and further refused to perform any of the other conditions of the purchase contract, including the following provisions:
'1. In the event the Purchaser fails to take delivery of the vehicle as herein provided, it is agreed that in lieu of proving damages or other remedies under Chapt. 402 Wis.Stats., the Dealer's liquidated damages (the same not to be a penalty) shall be 20% of the cash delivery price, and the Dealer shall have the right to apply any down payment against such damages.
'* * *
'3. In addition to the provisions of 1. above and as a deterrent to purchaser failing to take delivery of the vehicle as herein provided, the purchaser agrees that if he does not accept delivery, he shall at Dealer's option forfeit to Dealer, as a penalty, 5% of the cash delivery price of the vehicle as specified by Section 218.01(5m), Wisconsin statutes.'
Defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that the complaint 'does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.'
The trial court, after a hearing, overruled defendant's demurrer.
Defendant appeals.
Sidney Spector, Milwaukee, for appellant.
Grootemaat, Cook & Franke, William L. Boyd, Milwaukee, of counsel, for respondent.
The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court was correct in overruling defendant's demurrer.
This court has repeatedly held (as the trial court noted):
1
The trial court then stated:
'The complaint pleads a contract (duty), a breach of that contract and damages flowing reasonably from that breach and that totally states a cause of action.'
Defendant now contends that the demurrer was proper for two reasons:
1. The liquidated damages are unreasonable and consequently void as a penalty pursuant to sec. 402.718(1), Stats.;
2. The complaint does not state essential facts from which the damages, if legal, can be computed.
Neither of these assertions has any merit.
1. Legality of the liquidated damages. Admittedly liquidated damages provided in a contract must be reasonable to be enforceable. Sec. 402.718(1), Stats., provides:
2
However, the statute contemplates that a liquidated-damages clause may be enforceable if 'reasonable.' Such clauses are not void, as a matter of law. Therefore, it is necessary for some evidence to be presented on this matter. Even assuming arguendo that this particular clause is unenforceable, plaintiff is still entitled to recover whatever damages he can prove. The mere demand for an amount in damages which is excessive does not render the complaint subject to demurrer:
'* * * A prayer for relief is no substantive part of a complaint and the fact that the plaintiff 'asks for more relief than that which his pleaded facts entitle him to have is not reached by demurrer. " 3
The unreasonableness of the liquidated damages, then, is properly a matter of defense. It cannot be reached here by demurrer...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
...provisions to consumer's demand to Ford to repair latent defect in the taillight assembly gaskets); and Northwestern Motor Car, Inc. v. Pope, 51 Wis.2d 292, 187 N.W.2d 200 (1971) (regarding liquidated damages under Wis. Stat. § 402.718(1) in automobile purchase ¶68 In addition to the legisl......
-
Wassenaar v. Panos
...proving facts which would justify the trial court's concluding that the clause should not be enforced. Northwestern Motor Car, Inc. v. Pope, 51 Wis.2d 292, 295, 187 N.W.2d 200 (1971). Placing the burden of proof on the challenger is consistent with giving the nonbreaching party the advantag......
-
Putnam v. Time Warner Cable
...payments. [10] ¶ 17. "[L]iquidated damages provided in a contract must be reasonable to be enforceable." Northwestern Motor Car, Inc. v. Pope, 51 Wis. 2d 292, 294, 187 N.W.2d 200 (1971); WIS. STAT. § 402.718(1);7 see also Telescripps, 542 S.E.2d at 642. The validity of a liquidated-damages ......
-
In re Soc'y Ins. Co. COVID-19 Bus. Interruption Protection Ins. Litig.
...contract and damages flowing reasonably from that breach and that totally states a cause of action." Northwestern Motor Car, Inc. v. Pope , 51 Wis.2d 292, 187 N.W.2d 200, 203 (1971) ; accord Lyon Financial Services, Inc. v. Illinois Paper and Copier Co. , 848 N.W.2d 539, 543 (Minn. 2014) ("......