Notice: Second Circuit Local Rule 0.23 States Unreported Opinions Shall Not Be Cited Or Otherwise Used In Unrelated Cases.Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. 117
| Decision Date | 20 March 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 71-2015.,71-2015. |
| Citation | 456 F.2d 1335 |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
| Parties | NOTICE: Second Circuit Local Rule 0.23 states unreported opinions shall not be cited or otherwise used in unrelated cases.National Labor Relations Board, Petitionerv.Local 117, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners ofAmerica, AFL-CIO, Respondent. |
Before HAYS and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.
This cause came on to be heard upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order issued against the Respondent Local 117, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, AFL-CIO, its officers, agents, and representatives on April 9, 1971. The Court heard argument of respective counsel on March 20, 1972, and at the conclusion of oral argument handed down its decision granting enforcement of the Board's Order.
On consideration whereof, it is hereby ordered and adjudged by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that the said order of the National Labor Relations Board in said proceeding be enforced, and that Local 117, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, AFL-CIO, its officers, agents, and representatives, abide by and perform the directions of the Board in said Order contained.
It is further ordered that costs shall be taxed against the Respondent.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Holtzman v. Schlesinger
... ... in her capacity as a member of the United States House of Representatives, et al., ... United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit ... Argued August 8, 1973 ... We announced that opinions would promptly follow so that if the Supreme ... as elaborately or completely as might otherwise be appropriate in a case of this significance, it ... NLRB v. Plasterers' Local, etc., 79, 404 U.S. 116, 129 n. 24, 92 S.Ct. 360, ... The mandate shall issue forthwith ... OAKES, ... Hamilton ed. 1851), cited in Note, Congress, The President, and The Power ... for the conduct of the foreign relations of the United States, including relations with ... No. 939-73 (D.D.C., July 23, 1973), notice of appeal filed, Aug. 1, 1973; Gravel v. Laird, ... ...
-
Sylvan v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
... ... 3542-74. United States Tax Court Filed December 16, 1975 ... The ... Respondent mailed a statutory notice of deficiency to petitioner by certified mail on ... To hold otherwise would make the important right to a prepayment ... As the Third Circuit said in permitting evidence as to timely mailing ... be some logical inconsistency between the rule applicable where there is no postmark at all and ... the cover in which such petition is mailed shall be deemed to be the date of delivery of the ... date, unless registered or certified mail is used. It also provides that if the postmark on the ... All of the published opinions of this Court and other courts involving the ... Making reference to many of the cases cited above, we noted that this Court, and others, had ... ...
-
Magnone v. US
... ... Michael MAGNONE, Plaintiff, ... UNITED STATES of America, Defendant ... Joseph V. MAGNONE and ... sue for a refund under the Flora pre-payment rule and 26 U.S.C. § 7422. They assert also that this ... 's delay in the issuance of the deficiency notice was "grossly unfair." (Complaint, ¶ 17) ... 733 ... No suit or proceeding shall be maintained in any court for the recovery of ... Their administrative claims cited § 6601(c) as the basis for recovery, while their ... ...
-
Matter of Rego Crescent Corp.
... ... No. 181-0635 ... United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York ... October ... I shall therefore refer to these transactions as loans ... corporation because they were so intended; second, because the corporation was under-capitalized at ... Not one of the cases cited, however, and none that the court could find, ... First, there is no general rule that debts based on shareholder loans will be ... has made this clearer than the Second Circuit when, in In re Madelaine, Inc., 164 F.2d 419 ... Phillips, 5 Cir., 117 F.2d 497, 503. The case of Pepper v. Litton, ... contrary, for there the dominant stockholder used his claim for accumulated salary to defraud other ... ...