Nottingham v. Farmers & Merch.S Trust Bank.*
Decision Date | 28 April 1938 |
Court | Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | NOTTINGHAM et al. v. FARMERS & MERCHANTS TRUST BANK.* |
Error to Circuit Court, Northampton County; John E. Nottingham, Judge.
Action by notice of motion for judgment by the Farmers & Merchants Trust Bank against T. H. Nottingham and another to recover on a bond which defendants and others as directors of a bank executed to the plaintiff. To review a judgment for the plaintiff, defendants bring error.
Affirmed.
Argued before CAMPBELL, C. J., and HOLT, GREGORY, EGGLESTON, and SPRATLEY, JJ.
Quinton G. Nottingham, of Eastville, W. A. Dickinson, of Cape Charles, and James E. Heath, of Norfolk, for plaintiffs in error.
Mears & Mears, of Eastville, for defendant in error.
In the year 1932, and for some time prior thereto, there were operating in Northampton county, Va., three banks known as the Cheriton Banking Company, Incorporated (hereinafter called the Cheriton Bank), the Townsend Banking Company, Incorporated, and the Farmers & Merchants Trust Bank. In December of that year these three banks, with the approval and under the supervision of the State Bureau of Insurance and Banking, determined to merge into one institution to be known as the Farmers & Merchants Trust Bank.
Shortly before this an examination of the books of the Cheriton Bank had convinced the Bureau of Insurance and Banking that its assets had depreciated in value to such an extent as to be approximately $32,000 short of the amount necessary to meet its liabilities, other than its capital stock obligations. Accordingly, the head of the bureau notified the officers and directors of the Cheriton Bank that that institution would not be allowed to come into the merger unless its directors, or some of them, entered into a bond in the principal sum of $32,000 to cover such deficiency in its assets.
A meeting of the board of directors of the Cheriton Bank was held on December 20, 1932, at which the proposed merger agreement and necessary bond were dis cussed. There were present at this meeting T. H. Nottingham, S. T. Nottingham (both of whom had been directors for a number of years), and all of the other directors except R. Fulton Powell. Without objection it was unanimously resolved that the agreement and the required bond should be executed.
Accordingly, on December 23, 1932, there was executed the following instrument, which is the subject of the suit:
On December 23, 1932, the necessary formal resolutions were passed by the board of directors of the Cheriton Bank authorizing the execution of the merger agreement. There were present at this meeting the same ten directors who had executed the bond. The remaining director, R. Fulton Powell, was not present. Subsequently, on January 10, 1933, a meeting of the stockholders formally approved the merger agreement and ratified the action of the board of directors in authorizing its execution by the necessary officers. Both T. H. Nottingham and S. T. Nottingham were present at this meeting. Each of the directors of the Cheriton Bank, including T. H. Nottingham and S. T. Nottingham, then executed the merger agreement.
All of the statutory requirements having been complied with, the merger became effective on January 13, 1933, and the bond was delivered to the merged institution.
Under the terms of the merger agreement the liabilities of the Cheriton Bank, exclusive of its liabilities to its stockholders by virtue of stock ownership, were assumed by the merged corporation. The Cheriton Bank, in turn, agreed to deliver to the merged bank a sufficient amount of assets or cash to equal the amount of the liabilities thus assumed.
It is undisputed that the total amount of assets delivered by the Cheriton Bank to the merged institution, and appraised in the manner required by the merger agreement, was more than $32,000 short of the total amount of liabilities of the Cheriton Bank assumed by the merged institution. Thereupon demand was made by the merged bank upon those parties who had signed the $32,000 bond for payment thereof. Seven of these parties paid the total amount of $25,200. To recover the balance of $6,800 the Farmers & Merchants Trust Bank (hereinafter called the plaintiff) instituted the present suit against T. H. Nottingham and S. T. Nottingham (hereinafter called the defendants), who had declined to pay anything on account of the bond.
After issue had been joined there was a trial by a jury, which resulted in a verdict of $6,800 against the defendants. This writ of error has been...
To continue reading
Request your trial