Notto v. Atlantic City Railroad Company

CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtSWAYZE, J.
CitationNotto v. Atlantic City Railroad Company, 69 A. 968, 75 N.J.L. 826 (N.J. 1908)
Decision Date15 June 1908
PartiesROSARIO NOTTO, ADMINISTRATOR, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ATLANTIC CITY RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error to Supreme Court.

Action by Rosario Notto against the Atlantic City Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed.

Thompson & Cole, for plaintiff in error. Andrew J. King and Carrow & Kraft, for defendant in error.

SWAYZE, J. The only assignment of error that we think we need consider is that which challenges the admission in evidence of volume 20 of the American & English Encyclopaedia of Law to prove the Carlisle Mortality Tables.

That mortality tables are admissible in a proper case has been decided by this court. Camden & Atlantic R. R. Co. v. Williams, 61 N. J. Law, 646, 40 Atl. 634. We there said that the authenticity of the paper produced as the table should be established by proof satisfactory to the court, as by the testimony of a witness familiar with it and with its use, and that its office and use should be explained by a competent witness.

The only proof in this case was by the testimony of one of the counsel for the plaintiff, who produced the volume of the Encyclopaedia and testified that the tables represented the reasonable expectancy of life as shown from the experience gathered by insurance companies in America and England, and was known as the "Carlisle Table." Upon cross-examination he said he knew nothing other than what he saw in the book, and had not compared the table there given with a table recognized and established as the Carlisle Table. There was no preliminary proof as to his knowledge or use of the Carlisle Table, and we cannot assume that a lawyer is necessarily competent to testify as to the accuracy of a mortality...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Hampton v. Pa. R. Co., s. 24, 28.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • May 17, 1935
    ...actuary, to testify from mortality tables, the authenticity of which was not challenged [Notto v. Atlantic City R. R. Co., 75 N. J. Law, 826, 69 A. 968, 17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1138, 127 Am. St. Rep. 835], as to the expectancy of life of the deceased and his widow. There was no objection to thi......
  • St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company v. Trotter
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • December 4, 1911
    ... ... S ... S. Stewart, division surgeon for the railroad company, ... testified that he made a professional examination of the ...           [101 ... Ark. 191] In Kansas City So. Ry. Co. v ... Worthington, ante p. 128, the court said: ... ...
  • Marendino v. Spitz
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • January 13, 1939
    ...N.J.L. 189, 192, 35 A. 915; Camden & Atlantic R. R. Co. v. Williams, 61 N.J.L. 646, 40 A. 634; Notto v. Atlantic City R. R., 75 N.J.L. 826, 69 A. 968, 17 L.R.A.,N.S., 1138, 127 Am.St.Rep. 835; Dickerson v. Mutual Grocery Co., 100 N.J.L. 118, 124 A. 785; Cf. Wigmore on Evidence, Vol. 4, Sec.......