NTD I, LLC v. Alliant Asset Mgmt. Co.

Decision Date20 July 2018
Docket NumberNo. 4:16-CV-1246 ERW,4:16-CV-1246 ERW
Citation337 F.Supp.3d 877
Parties NTD I, LLC, North Tower Development, LLC, and Paul Weismann, Plaintiffs, v. ALLIANT ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, Alliant Capital, Ltd., Alliant Credit Facility ALP, LLC, Alliant Tax Credit Fund 36, Ltd., and Alliant Tax Credit 36, LLC., Defendants. Alliant Tax Credit Fund 36, Ltd., and Alliant Tax Credit 36, LLC, Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. NTD I LLC, Paul Weismann, and WC Orange LLC, Counterclaim Defendants.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri

Michael J. Fencer, Casner and Edwards, LLP, Boston, MA, Scott K.G. Kozak, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiffs.

Andrew D. Lamb, Robert P. Berry, Berry and Silberberg PC, St. Louis, MO, Joshua Courtney Stokes, Berry and Silberberg PC, Pasadena, CA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

E. RICHARD WEBBER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs NTD I, LLC, Paul Weismann, and WC Orange, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaim Counts III and IV [105] and Counterclaim Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction [116].

I. BACKGROUND

This lawsuit originated in the Eastern District of Missouri when NTD I, LLC ("NTD"), North Tower Development, LLC, and Paul Weismann ("Weismann") filed a complaint on August 1, 2016, asserting various claims against Alliant Asset Management Company, LLC, Alliant Capital, Ltd., Alliant Credit Facility, Ltd., Alliant Credit Facility ALP, LLC, Alliant Tax Credit Fund 36, Ltd., and Alliant Tax Credit 36, LLC related to a limited partnership agreement between the parties [1].

Following this Court's dismissal of some of the claims, Alliant Tax Credit Fund 36, Ltd. and Alliant Tax Credit 36, LLC ("Counterclaim Plaintiffs") asserted the following counterclaims in their Third Amended Counterclaims: (1) declaratory relief against NTD and Weismann stating they failed to cause Rental Achievement as required under the Limited Partnership Agreement; (2) breach of contract and injunctive relief against NTD and Weismann for withdrawing funds from the operating deficit reserve account and the replacement reserve account without approval of the Administrative Limited Partner;1 (3) breach of contract and injunctive relief against NTD, Weismann, and WC Orange ("WCO") because WCO purchased the debts of the partnership without the consent of the Administrative Limited Partner and WCO is related to the General Partner; (4) breach of fiduciary duty and injunctive relief against NTD, Weismann, and WCO by allowing, participating in, and facilitating the purchase of the Partnership's debt by WCO; (5) breach of contract and declaratory relief against NTD and Weismann for failure to repair material deficiencies and/or non-conformities in the physical property of Water Tower Place; and (6) breach of contract and specific performance against NTD and Paul Weismann for failure to pay for any development deficits which are incurred by the partnership prior to rental achievement.

NTD, Weismann, and WCO ("Counterclaim Defendants") filed the instant motion for summary judgment on May 8, 2018, seeking an order: (i) granting summary judgment against Defendants on Counts III and IV of the Amended Counterclaims; and (ii) granting such other and further relief as the Court may deem proper and just [105]. In their Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Counterclaim Plaintiffs are seeking a declaration Weismann and NTD breached fiduciary duties to the Limited Partners and are requesting injunctive relief prohibiting WCO from exercising its mortgage rights against Water Tower Place, and imposing a constructive trust upon that mortgage interest [104].

A. Uncontroverted Facts

Water Tower Place, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a Missouri limited liability partnership formed on January 9, 2006 [107 ¶ 1; 125, p. 1 ¶ 1]. NTD is a for-profit Missouri limited liability company formed as a partnership by and among its members on February 1, 2006 [107 ¶ 2; 125, p. 2 ¶ 2]. NTD was formed to be, and is the General Partner of the Partnership [107 ¶ 3; 125, p. 2 ¶ 3]. When NTD was formed, Weismann directly acquired and thereafter directly owned twenty percent (20%) of the outstanding NTD membership interest [107 ¶ 4; 125, p. 2 ¶ 4]. At the time of formation, four other natural persons, unrelated to Weismann by blood, marriage, or other familial relationship, separately and directly acquired and thereafter directly owned their respective NTD membership interests totaling the remaining eighty percent (80%) of the outstanding General Partner membership interest [107 ¶ 5; 125, p. 2 ¶ 5]. All profits and losses and all other tax attributes of NTD are allocated among the General Partner members on the basis of those members' respective percentage of interest in the General Partner [107 ¶ 6; 125, p. 3 ¶ 6]. Weismann testified he makes decisions for NTD [130 ¶ 2; 125, p. 8 ¶ 2, 4]. NTD's offices are in Weismann's offices in Connecticut [130 ¶ 3; 125, p. 8 ¶ 3].

Counterclaim Plaintiffs, Alliant Tax Credit Fund 36, Ltd. and Alliant Tax Credit 36, LLC, also known as the Limited Partners, are the limited partners of the Partnership [107 ¶ 7; 125, p. 3 ¶ 7]. The General Partner and the Limited Partners are the parties to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated July 1, 2006 ( "LPA") [107 ¶ 9; 125, p. 3 ¶ 9]. The Limited Partners have never rescinded the LPA [107, ¶ 10, 125, p.3, ¶ 10]. The Partnership financed the acquisition2 and rehabilitation of the property by a 2006 issuance of tax-exempt Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds identified in Schedule A of the LPA to create state and federal low income tax credits (the "Bonds") [107 ¶ 11; 125, p. 3 ¶ 11]. The Partnership Bond obligations are secured by, among other instruments, loan agreements and covenants (the "Bond Loan Agreement"), and mortgages granted by the Partnership to the Bond holder (the "Bond Mortgage") [107 ¶ 12, 125, p. 4 ¶ 12]. At the time of the issuance of the Bonds, U.S. Bank National Association ("USB") was the holder of the Bonds and the Bond Mortgage [107 ¶ 13, 125, p. 4 ¶ 13].

On September 8, 2010, Richard Deters, Jr., Executor of the Estate of Richard Deters, Sr., an original General Partner member, assigned the decedent's seven percent (7%) NTD membership interest directly to Weismann [107 ¶ 14; 125, p. 4 ¶ 14]. On or about September 13, 2010, George Kruntchev, an original NTD member, assigned his thirty percent (30%) NTD membership interest directly to Weismann [107 ¶ 15; 125, p. 4 ¶ 15]. On and at all times after September 13, 2010, Weismann has directly owned fifty-seven percent (57%) of the NTD membership interests [107 ¶ 16; 125, p. 4 ¶ 16]. Before, on, and at all times after September 13, 2010, the other two remaining original NTD members, both of whom are natural persons unrelated to Weismann by blood, marriage, or other familial relationship, have owned thirty percent (30%) and thirteen percent (13%), respectively, of the NTD membership interests [107 ¶ 17; 125, p. 5 ¶ 17].

WCO is a for-profit Delaware limited liability company (f/k/a/ WC Mapleton LLC) formed on January 19, 2016 [107 ¶ 19; 125, p. 5 ¶ 19]. At the time WCO was formed, PAW Associates Properties, LLC ("Properties"), a Delaware limited liability company, directly acquired and has thereafter directly owned one hundred percent (100%) of the outstanding membership interest in WCO [107 ¶ 21; 125, p. 6 ¶ 21]. PAW Associates, LLC ("Associates"), a Delaware limited liability company, has at all times directly owned one hundred percent (100%) of the outstanding membership interest in Properties [107 ¶ 22; 125, p. 6 ¶ 22]. Weismann and Sam Brill make the business decisions for Properties3 and for WCO [130 ¶ 10, 11; 125, p. 9 ¶ 10, 11].4 Brill was formerly the Chief Investment Officer of Weismann Capital, and Weismann is the owner and chief executive [130 ¶ 8, 9; 125, p. 8 ¶ 8, p. 9 ¶ 9].5 Both Weismann and Brill are based in Weismann's Connecticut office [130 ¶ 11; 125 p. 9 ¶ 11].

The Paul A. Weismann Descendants' Trust (the "Grantor Trust"), a Delaware grantor trust created by Weismann's father, the late Dietrich Weismann, for the benefit of Weismann and his descendants, has at all times directly owned one hundred percent (100%) of the outstanding membership interest in Associates [107 ¶ 23; 125, p. 6 ¶ 23]. Weismann and his wife are the co-trustees of the Grantor Trust [130 ¶ 6; 125, p. 8 ¶ 6]. The only beneficiaries of the Grantor Trust are Weismann and his three minor children [107 ¶ 24; 125, p. 6 ¶ 24].6

On June 28, 2016, WCO purchased from USB all of its right, title, and interest in and to the Bonds and the Bond Mortgage, and all of the USB rights under the Bond Loan Agreement pursuant to a Purchase Agreement of the same date [107 ¶ 25; 125, p. 7 ¶ 25]. The WCO purchase of the Bonds, the Bond Mortgage, and the rights under the Bond loan Agreement is only one of the private real estate investments held by WCO [107 ¶ 21; 125, p. 7 ¶ 26]. Weismann does not, nor has he ever directly or indirectly owned any stock, membership, or other equity interest in either of the Limited Partners [107 ¶ 27; 125, p. 7 ¶ 29]. The General Partner, Properties, Associates, WCO, and Grantor Trust have not, nor have they ever directly or indirectly owned any stock, membership, or other equity interest in either of the Limited Partners [107 ¶¶ 27-32; 125, pp. 7-8 ¶¶ 27-32].

In 2016, WCO purchased the Mortgage Note on the Partnership with a face price of $3.7 million for $2.1 million [130 ¶ 12; 125, p. 9 ¶ 12]. On April 27, 2018, WCO sent a notice of loan acceleration to the General Partner, the Partnership, and the Limited Partners [130 ¶ 17; 125, p. 9 ¶ 17]. On May 7, 2018, Limited Partners made a demand pursuant to Weismann's Guaranty Agreement and the terms of the LPA that Weismann pay the full amount of the accelerated loan [130 ¶ 22; 125, p. 10 ¶ 22]. Weisman rejected this demand [130 ¶ 22; 125, p. 10 ¶ 22]. Weismann...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Sanderson v. Bailey
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • October 27, 2023
    ... ... the injunction. NTD I, LLC v. Alliant Asset Mgmt. Co., ... LLC , 337 F.Supp.3d 877, 889-90 (E.D. Mo. 2018); ... Noodles ... ...
  • Jennings v. City of Univ. City
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • January 18, 2022
    ...each of the parties' rights and whether the non-movant has already taken remedial action. NTD I, LLC v. Alliant Asset Mgmt. Co., LLC, 337 F.Supp.3d 877, 889 (E.D. Mo. 2018). As stated above, Plaintiffs, who continue to perform in the Loop, have not demonstrated any irreparable harm. Further......
  • Jennings v. City of Univ. City, 4:20-CV-00584 JAR
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • October 22, 2021
    ... ... injunction. NTD I, LLC v. Alliant Asset Mgmt. Co., ... LLC , 337 F.Supp.3d 877, 889-90 (E.D. Mo. 2018); ... Noodles ... ...
  • Spring Lake Pork, LLC v. Great Plains Mgmt., L.L.C., Case No. 2:19 CV 18 CDP
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • June 30, 2020
    ...and there is a showing the subservient party places a trust and confidence in the dominant party.NTD I, LLC v. Alliant Asset Mgmt. Co., LLC, 337 F. Supp. 3d 877, 887 (E.D. Mo. 2018) (citing Chmieleski v. City Products Corp., 660 S.W.2d 275, 294 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983)). Drawing all reasonable i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT