Nunes v. Zoning Bd. of Review of Town of Bristol, s. 1431
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Rhode Island |
Citation | 93 R.I. 483,176 A.2d 721 |
Docket Number | 1432,Nos. 1431,s. 1431 |
Parties | Joseph P. NUNES et al. v. ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW OF TOWN OF BRISTOL et al. Gilberto FERREIRA et al. v. ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW OF TOWN OF BRISTOL et al. M. P. |
Decision Date | 12 January 1962 |
Page 721
v.
ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW OF TOWN OF BRISTOL et al.
Gilberto FERREIRA et al.
v.
ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW OF TOWN OF BRISTOL et al.
[93 R.I. 484] Hugo L. Ricci, Providence, for petitioners Nunes et al.
Leo Patrick McGowan, Helen M. MacGregor, Providence, for petitioners Ferreira et al.
Frank L. Martin, Town Sol., for respondent.
[93 R.I. 483] PER CURIAM.
These are petitions for certiorari to review the action of the zoning board of review of the town of Bristol in granting the town a variance from the zoning ordinance for the purpose of building an addition to a fire station. In compliance with the writs, the pertinent records have been certified to this court. The petitioners contend that the board's decision is illegal and void and should be quashed.
At the hearing on the petitions before us the respondent town conceded that the decision was a nullity. In view of such concession we decided from the bench that there was no further justiciable controversy between the parties on the issue raised by the petitions and that the decision of the board should therefore be quashed.
Page 722
For the above reason only and without in any way intending to pass judgment on other contentions in the briefs of the parties, the petition in each cause is granted, the decision of the board is quashed, and the records certified [93 R.I. 484] are ordered returned to the board with our decision endorsed thereon.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nunes v. Town of Bristol, s. 6
...zoning board for relief. The board granted the application but certain of plaintiffs appealed this action to us. In Nunes v. Zoning Board of Review, 93 R.I. 483, 176 A.2d 721, the town, for reasons which are not apparent in the record, conceded that the board's decision was a nullity. Becau......