Nunnelly v. Doty
| Decision Date | 30 October 1925 |
| Citation | Nunnelly v. Doty, 210 Ky. 642, 276 S.W. 152 (Ky. 1925) |
| Parties | Nunnelly v. Doty. |
| Court | Supreme Court of Kentucky |
1. Elections — Persons Voting Against Part of Party's Nominees at Last Election Not Qualified to Vote in Party Primary. — Under Ky. Stats., section 1550-19, providing that voter must be a member of party for whose nominees he intends to vote, a person offering to vote in a party primary must be affiliated in good faith with party, and is not qualified if he voted against part of nominees of his party at last election.
2. Elections — Infant Disqualified — An infant cannot vote.
3. Elections — If Precinct Line Runs Through House of Voter, he Must Elect His Precinct. — A voter must be a resident of precinct, and if precinct line runs through his house he may elect to vote in either precinct, and option once exercised is final.
4. Elections — Party Must Vote in Precinct in which House he Lives in Stands, Though Majority of Farm is in Other Precinct. — A party must vote in precinct in which house he lives in stands, though majority of farm is in another precinct.
5. Elections — Where Precinct Lines Are Unknown, Proof Must be Clear to Disfranchise Voter. — Where lines of precinct have never been run out, or have been lost, weight will be given to fact that party has voted in precinct without objection, paid taxes, and used schools, and proof must be clear to disfranchise voter.
6. Elections — Residence Not Lost by Temporary Absence Without Intention of Not Returning. — A voter residing in a precinct in good faith does not lose residence by temporary absence for business, but will lose it by moving without intention of returning, and if he intends to return it must be continuous and reasonably shown.
7. Elections — Voting on Table Not Permitted Unless Party is Sworn and Swears he is Blind or Physically Disabled. — A party may not vote on table without being sworn and swearing that he is blind or physically disabled to mark his ballot.
8. Elections — Secret Ballot is Not Voted Where Another Person is in Booth at Time. — A voter does not vote a secret ballot when another person is in the booth at the time, and such ballots will not be counted.
9. Appeal and Error — Exceptions to Depositions Not Ruled on or Requested to be Ruled on by Circuit Court Waived — Exception to depositions on ground that they were taken too late is waived when not ruled on nor requested to be ruled on by circuit court.
10. Appeal and Error — Objection to Depositions Cannot be Made for First Time on Appeal when Record Shows no Exception Thereto. — Objection to depositions cannot be made for first time on appeal where record fails to show exceptions thereto, which cuts off all opportunity to amend pleadings.
Appeal from Warren Circuit Court.
THOMAS, THOMAS & LOGAN for appellant.
DENHARDT & HUNTSMAN and GARDNER K. BYERS for appellee.
Appellant and appellee were opposing candidates for the Democratic nomination for justice of the peace in Bristow magisterial district of Warren county in the primary election held last August. Appellee received on the face of the returns 307 votes and appellant 309. Appellee filed notice of contest. The circuit court awarded the certificate to Doty. Nunnelly appeals.
The grounds of contest rest upon illegal votes cast on both sides. One of the grounds is that persons who were not Democrats were allowed to vote. Section 1550, subsection 19, Ky. Stats., after providing certain qualifications, provides as follows:
"He shall, in addition to said qualifications, be a member of the party for whose nominees he intends to cast his vote, and shall have affiliated with said party and supported its nominees, and no persons shall be deemed to have affiliated with the party in whose primary he seems (seeks) to cast his vote, if he voted against the nominee or nominees of such party at the last general election."
A person offering to vote in a party primary is not qualified if he voted against the nominee or nominees of the party at the last general election. To be qualified he must have supported his party ticket and must have affiliated in good faith with the party. He is not qualified if he voted for one of the party's nominees and against others at the last election. Com. v. Carson, 171 Ky. 288. An infant cannot vote. The following votes should not be counted:
For Nunnelly — David Bratton, Mrs. Matt Bratton, Willie Harlow, Earl Canter.
Elkins, W.L. Gray, H.B. Gray, Roy Carrier, Robert Farley, Clay Watts.
A voter must be a resident of the precinct. If the precinct line runs through his house he may, at his option, vote in either precinct, unless excluded by the order of the court fixing the line, but when he once exercises his option this is final. He must vote in the precinct in which...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting