Nutting v. Wilcox
Decision Date | 14 February 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 20375,No. 2,20375,2 |
Citation | 223 N.E.2d 501,140 Ind.App. 368 |
Parties | William E. NUTTING, Appellant, v. Louis N. WILCOX and Louis K. Wilcox, Appellees |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
Patrick & Anderson, South Bend, for appellant.
Roland Obenchain, Jr., Jones, Obenchain, Johnson, Ford & Pankow, South Bend, for appellees.
This appeal arises from a cause of action filed by the Appellant, William E. Nutting, against the Appellees, Louis N. Wilcox and Louis K. Wilcox, for recovery of damages for personal injury and property damage as a result of a collision between the automobile owned and operated by Appellant and an automobile owned by the Appellee, Louis N. Wilcox, then being operated by Appellee, Louis K. Wilcox.
At the conclusion of Appellant's evidence and before the introduction of any evidence by Appellees, the trial Court directed the jury to return its verdict for the Appellee, Louis N. Wilcox, and against Appellant on his complaint. At the conclusion of all of the evidence, the Court also directed the jury to return a verdict for Appellee, Louis K. Wilcox. Judgment was entered accordingly. From this judgment Appellant appeals.
By leave of this Court, Appellant filed an amended assignment of errors wherein the sole assigned error is the overruling of Appellant's motion for a new trial. Said motion contains the following grounds:
'3. * * * waived * * *
Appellee contends that the bill of exceptions containing the evidence is not properly in the record. If this contention is correct, no question is presented for our consideration since the errors assigned require an examination of the evidence.
Appellant's purported bill of exceptions was not signed or dated by the trial judge; and, there is no order book entry in the record showing presentation to or signing of the bill of exceptions by the trial judge. Further, the clerk's certificate is erroneous on its face, as it recites that the bill of exceptions was filed 'after the same was signed by the Judge'.
Although this certificate is signed by the clerk it is neither dated nor file stamped by the clerk.
Rule 2--3, Rules of the Supreme Court, provides:
'* * * Every bill of exceptions tendered prior to the filing of the transcript in the appellate tribunal shall, if correct, be signed by the judge and filed with the clerk, which filing may be evidenced by an order book entry or the clerk's certificate. * * *' (emphasis supplied)
The foregoing provision is mandatory,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Indiana Bd. of Beauty Culturist Examiners v. Royal Beauty Academy, Inc.
...purports to be a bill of exceptions not signed by the trial judge presents no questions based upon the purported bill. Nutting v. Wilcox (1967), Ind.App., 223 N.E.2d 501. The principal questions sought to be presented in this appeal require an examination of the bill of exceptions in order ......
-
Rhoden's Estate, In re
...judge. Failure to comply with this procedure renders the bill of exceptions defective and, as this court stated in Nutting v. Wilcox (1967), Ind.App., 223 N.E.2d 501: 'Rule 2--3, Rules of the Supreme Court, provides: '* * * Every bill of exceptions tendered prior to the filing of the transc......