Oak Laminates v. U.S., 85-1873
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 783 F.2d 195 |
| Parties | , 4 Fed. Cir. (T) 43 OAK LAMINATES D/O Oak Materials Group, Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee. Appeal |
| Docket Number | No. 85-1873,85-1873 |
| Decision Date | 11 February 1986 |
Page 195
v.
The UNITED STATES, Appellee.
Federal Circuit.
Page 196
David O. Elliott, Barnes, Richardson and Colburn, New York City, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Richard Haroian.
Veronica A. Perry, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office.
Before KASHIWA, * SMITH and NIES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Oak Laminates d/o Oak Materials Group (Oak Laminates) appeals from the decision in Oak Laminates d/o Oak Materials Group v. United States, 628 F.Supp. 1577 (1984), reh'g denied, 601 F.Supp. 1031 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1984), in which Chief Judge Re of the United States Court of International Trade held that Oak Laminates had not overcome the presumption of correctness that attached to the Customs Service's classification of the merchandise imported by Oak Laminates. We affirm on the basis of these decisions.
AFFIRMED
---------------
* Judge Kashiwa retired on 7 January 1986. Before his retirement he participated in the consideration and decision of this case. Before Judge Kashiwa's retirement all members of the panel joined in this opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. US, 90-06-00300.
...F.2d 177 (Fed.Cir.1988); Oak Laminates Div. of Oak Materials Group v. United States, 8 CIT 300, 302, 601 F.Supp. 1031, 1033 (1984), aff'd, 783 F.2d 195 (Fed.Cir.1986). Pursuant to Rule 59(a)(2) of the Rules of this Court, it is incumbent upon the Court to consider whether the movant is enti......
-
Belfont Sales Corp. v. US, Court No. 81-12-01724-S.
...(1986); Oak Laminates d/o Oak Materials Group v. United States, 8 CIT 300, 302, 601 F.Supp. 1031, 1033 (1984), aff'd, 4 Fed.Cir.(T) 43, 783 F.2d 195 (1986); V.G. Nahrgang Co. v. United States, 6 CIT 210, 211 (1983) available on WESTLAW, 1983 WL 2203. In ruling on a petition for rehearing, a......
-
Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. US, Court No. 81-01-00030.
...Div. of Oak Materials Group v. United States, 8 CIT 175, 628 F.Supp. 1577 (1984), reh'g denied, 8 CIT 300, 601 F.Supp. 1031 (1984), aff'd, 783 F.2d 195 It is clear this Court must presume the decision of Customs was correct as to every fact necessary to support the conclusion the imported g......
-
Bomont Industries v. US, Court No. 86-05-00557.
...(1986); Oak Laminates d/o Oak Materials Group v. United States, 8 CIT 300, 302, 601 F.Supp. 1031, 1033 (1984), aff'd, 4 Fed.Cir.(T) 43, 783 F.2d 195 (1986); V.G. Nahrgang Co. v. United States, 6 CIT 210, 211 1983 WL 2203 (1983). In ruling on a petition for rehearing, a court's previous deci......
-
Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. US, 90-06-00300.
...F.2d 177 (Fed.Cir.1988); Oak Laminates Div. of Oak Materials Group v. United States, 8 CIT 300, 302, 601 F.Supp. 1031, 1033 (1984), aff'd, 783 F.2d 195 (Fed.Cir.1986). Pursuant to Rule 59(a)(2) of the Rules of this Court, it is incumbent upon the Court to consider whether the movant is enti......
-
Belfont Sales Corp. v. US, Court No. 81-12-01724-S.
...(1986); Oak Laminates d/o Oak Materials Group v. United States, 8 CIT 300, 302, 601 F.Supp. 1031, 1033 (1984), aff'd, 4 Fed.Cir.(T) 43, 783 F.2d 195 (1986); V.G. Nahrgang Co. v. United States, 6 CIT 210, 211 (1983) available on WESTLAW, 1983 WL 2203. In ruling on a petition for rehearing, a......
-
Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. US, Court No. 81-01-00030.
...Div. of Oak Materials Group v. United States, 8 CIT 175, 628 F.Supp. 1577 (1984), reh'g denied, 8 CIT 300, 601 F.Supp. 1031 (1984), aff'd, 783 F.2d 195 It is clear this Court must presume the decision of Customs was correct as to every fact necessary to support the conclusion the imported g......
-
Bomont Industries v. US, Court No. 86-05-00557.
...(1986); Oak Laminates d/o Oak Materials Group v. United States, 8 CIT 300, 302, 601 F.Supp. 1031, 1033 (1984), aff'd, 4 Fed.Cir.(T) 43, 783 F.2d 195 (1986); V.G. Nahrgang Co. v. United States, 6 CIT 210, 211 1983 WL 2203 (1983). In ruling on a petition for rehearing, a court's previous deci......