Oakley v. State
Decision Date | 21 January 1964 |
Citation | 22 Wis.2d 298,125 N.W.2d 657 |
Parties | Donald R. OAKLEY, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Wisconsin, Defendant in Error. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
The district attorney for Rock county filed an information against the plaintiff in error, Donald R. Oakley, pursuant to a complaint signed by Mrs. * * *. The information charged Oakley with attempted rape and impersonating a peace officer in violation of secs. 939.32, 944.01 and 946.70, Stats. The jury found Oakley guilty on both charges and judgment was entered on the jury verdict. Oakley's motions for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict were denied. After a presentence examination, Oakley was committed to the state department of public welfare pursuant to sec. 959.15(6), Stats., 1 for treatment at the sex deviate facilities of the Wisconsin State Prison, 'until released therefrom pursuant to law.' The defendant Oakley obtained a writ of error to review that portion of the judgment of conviction finding him guilty of attempted rape.
J. Richard Long, Beloit, for plaintiff in error.
George Thompson, Atty. Gen., William A. Platz and Robert D. Martinson, Asst. Attys. Gen., Madison, William F. Donovan, Dist. Atty., Rock County, Janesville, for defendant in error.
The sole issue involved on appeal is whether there is credible evidence in the record upon which a jury could be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant Oakley was guilty of the crime of attempted rape. No issue is raised on this appeal as to the charge of impersonating a peace officer.
The testimony of the complaining witness, Mrs. * * *, revealed the following facts. Mrs. * * * was driving north on Highway 51 between Beloit and Janesville on a Sunday morning at approximately 6:45 a. m. It was daylight, and although there was some haze, visibility was good. Mrs. * * * testified that there was little traffic on the highway at that hour. As she was driving toward Janesville, the defendant Donald Oakley, who was driving a 1941 model pickup truck, passed her and slowed down, crowding Mrs. * * * off the traveled portion of the highway and onto the shoulder. Oakley stopped his truck directly in front of Mrs. * * *, walked back to her car and asked her through the open car window whether she knew the speed limit in that area. She replied that the speed limit was 50 miles per hour and then testified as follows:
'
'
'
According to Mrs. * * *, Oakley was not wearing a uniform, but was dressed in clean, well-pressed blue jeans and a light blue sport shirt.
After they had traveled five or six blocks north on Highway 51, Oakley turned east on the Avalon Road leading to Janesville. He drove on Avalon Road for about five or six blocks and stopped the car. Mrs. * * * was then asked:
She testified that she asked Oakley for identification after he had stopped the car on Avalon Road and that he then put his hands on her shoulders. Mrs. * * * continued her testimony as follows:
* * *
Oakley then drove back to his truck, got out of the car and left, after telling Mrs. * * * not to scream or holler. Mrs. * * * drove into Janesville, and from there to her home in a nearby city, arriving at her residence at about 8:30 a. m. She took a sleeping pill and went to bed for a few hours. She phoned her home-town police department at about 3:30 p. m., and told the officer that a man had forced her off the road near Janesville, but she mentioned nothing about any assault. She testified that she didn't stop and report the incident while she was in Janesville earlier in the day because she was too frightened and she didn't know where the Janesville police station was located. After telephoning the police, Mrs. * * * went to Milwaukee where she remained until the following Wednesday, July 27.
On cross-examination, Mrs. * * * testified that the whole encounter with Oakley lasted for about one hour. She testified that at no time did Oakley harm her although she 'ached all over' for three days afterwards and that she was not bruised at all; that he never actually had sexual intercourse with her; that he made no effort to penetrate her; that to her knowledge she did not scratch Oakley; and that she did not attempt to sound the car horn at any time. Mrs. * * * was asked whether Oakley had threatened her with physical violence at any time, and she replied; She was also asked by defense counsel about her testimony on this point at the preliminary examination:
'Q. Mrs. * * *, in that same preliminary examination, you were asked a question, referring to this man who was in your car:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Watson v. Nix
...with intent to rape because it is the defendant's state of mind, not the victim's, which is in issue. Id. at 179.8 In Oakley v. State, 22 Wis.2d 298, 125 N.W.2d 657 (1964), a 5-2 majority of the Wisconsin Supreme Court found that the evidence was insufficient to sustain an attempted rape co......
-
Lhost v. State
...intent and would commit the crime except for the intervention of another person or some other extraneous factor." In Oakley v. State, 22 Wis.2d 298, 125 N.W.2d 657 (1964), this court analyzed the two statutory requirements of intent and overt acts which must occur together in order to have ......
-
State v. Willison
...that show unequivocally that the defendant had the intent to cause the crime to be committed unless prevented. See Oakley v. State, 22 Wis.2d 298, 307, 125 N.W.2d 657 (1964); see also State v. Routon, 2007 WI App 178, ¶ 19, 304 Wis.2d 480, 736 N.W.2d 530. ¶ 8 The crime of solicitation is co......
-
Upshaw v. Powell
...would have committed the rape except for the intervention of another person or some other extraneous factor." Oakley v. State, 22 Wis.2d 298, 306, 125 N.W.2d 657, 661 (1964). Section 944.01 proscribed "sexual intercourse with a female * * * by force and against her will * * *." (Emphasis ad......