Oestereich v. SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM LOCAL BOARD NO. 11, CHEYENNE, WYOMING, 9902.
| Decision Date | 21 February 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 9902.,9902. |
| Citation | 390 F.2d 100 |
| Parties | James J. OESTEREICH, Appellant, v. SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM LOCAL BOARD NO. 11, CHEYENNE, WYOMING, Selective Service Appeal Board for the State of Wyoming, Col. Jack P. Brubaker, Wyoming Selective Service Director, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Melvin L. Wulf, New York City (John Griffiths, New Haven, Conn., Lawrence R. Velvel, Lawrence, Kan., John A. King, Laramie, Wyo., and William Reynard, Denver, Colo., were with him on the brief), for appellant.
Robert V. Zener, Atty., Dept. of Justice (Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert N. Chaffin, U. S. Atty., and Morton Hollander, Atty., Dept. of Justice, were with him on the brief), for appellee.
Before LEWIS, BREITENSTEIN and HICKEY, Circuit Judges.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the memorandum decision of the trial court and particularly in view of the jurisdictional restrictions contained in 50 App. U.S.C. § 460 (b) (3). Orderly classification of a registrant for military service is not punitive in nature. Compare United States v. Capson, 10 Cir., 347 F.2d 959. Appellant is not denied his right to ultimate judicial review of his claimed rights. Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375, 377, 75 S.Ct. 392, 99 L.Ed. 428.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Woodward v. Rogers, Civ. A. No. 42-72.
...of necessity an attack on the statute). 7See, e. g., Oestereich v. Selective Service System, 280 F.Supp. 78, 81 (D. Wyo.), aff'd, 390 F.2d 100 (10th Cir.), rev'd and remanded on other grounds, 393 U.S. 233, 89 S.Ct. 414, 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968); Sardino v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 36......
-
Cortright v. Resor, 70 C 909.
...(D.Conn.1968) and Oestereich v. Selective Serv. Sys. Local Bd. No. 11, 393 U.S. 233, 239, 89 S.Ct. 414, 417, 21 L.Ed. 2d 402, rev'g 390 F.2d 100 (10th Cir.), aff'g per curiam 280 F.Supp. 78 (D.Wyo. 1968). In Phillips v. Rockefeller, 435 F. 2d 976, 979 (2d Cir. 1970), a case involving the el......
-
Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No 11, Cheyenne Wyoming
...he brought suit to restrain his induction. The District Court dismissed the complaint, 280 F.Supp. 78, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. 390 F.2d 100. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted. 391 U.S. 912, 88 S.Ct. 1804, 20 L.Ed.2d As noted, § 6(g) of the A......
-
Petersen v. Clark
...stipulation of the parties staying further proceedings in this case. The parties then believed that Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11, 390 F.2d 100 (10th Cir. 1968), in which certiorari was then to have been sought, see 390 U.S. ____, 88 S.Ct. 1804, 20 L.Ed. 2d 651, ......