Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin (In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Kevin R. Rosin)

Citation407 Wis.2d 1,2023 WI 32,988 N.W.2d 681
Docket Number2022AP1916-D
Decision Date25 April 2023
Parties In the MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST Kevin R. ROSIN, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Kevin R. Rosin, Respondent.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin

ATTORNEY disciplinary proceeding. Attorney's license suspended.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 We review a stipulation filed by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Kevin R. Rosin pursuant to SCR 22.12.1 In the stipulation, Attorney Rosin does not contest that he committed two acts of professional misconduct as alleged by the OLR in its complaint against him. Attorney Rosin also does not contest that a one-year suspension of his Wisconsin law license is appropriate discipline for his misconduct.

¶2 Upon careful review of the matter, we approve the stipulation and suspend Attorney Rosin's law license for one year. We do not order any restitution, as none was requested by the OLR. Because this matter has been resolved by a stipulation under SCR 22.12 without the need for the appointment of a referee, we impose no costs on Attorney Rosin.

¶3 The facts of this disciplinary matter, as stipulated by Attorney Rosin, are as follows. Attorney Rosin was admitted to the practice of law in Wisconsin in May 2004. He does not have an address on file with the State Bar of Wisconsin. The most recent address known to the OLR is in Cedarburg, Wisconsin. Attorney Rosin has not previously been the subject of professional discipline.

¶4 At the time of the events giving rise to this matter, Attorney Rosin was a lawyer at an intellectual property law firm located in Illinois (hereafter, "the firm"). The terms of Attorney Rosin's employment at the firm required him to provide and bill all legal and patent-related services through the firm.

¶5 On May 3, 2021, Attorney Rosin formed a Wisconsin limited liability company dedicated to providing patent law services (hereafter, "the Wisconsin LLC"). He did not inform anyone at the firm that he had formed the Wisconsin LLC. Attorney Rosin understood that forming the Wisconsin LLC violated the terms of his employment with the firm.

¶6 On approximately May 6, 2021, Attorney Rosin solicited one of the firm's clients, C.G.J., to become a client of the Wisconsin LLC. On May 10, 2021, C.G.J. hired Attorney Rosin to perform patent-related services through the Wisconsin LLC. Attorney Rosin did not advise C.G.J. to terminate the firm's representation of him, or tell anyone at the firm that he was providing services to C.G.J. outside of the firm.

¶7 Attorney Rosin provided patent-related services to C.G.J. through the Wisconsin LLC between May 10, 2021 and November 2021. C.G.J. paid the Wisconsin LLC $82,501 for those services. Attorney Rosin did not report or remit any of the fees to the firm upon their receipt.

¶8 In addition, on October 21, 2021, Attorney Rosin spoke with a representative of a company that was not a client of the firm. Attorney Rosin proposed that the company hire the Wisconsin LLC to provide intellectual property and/or patent-related services, and he sent the company a proposed engagement letter for hiring the Wisconsin LLC. The company chose not to retain the Wisconsin LLC's services.

¶9 On November 30, 2021, the founding partners of the firm asked Attorney Rosin about information they had received that he was operating the Wisconsin LLC and doing work for at least one firm client outside of the firm. Attorney Rosin told the partners that he had done some minimal consulting work independently of the firm for one client, but he denied having filed patent applications for the client. Shortly thereafter, the partners obtained additional information showing that Attorney Rosin had filed several patent applications through the Wisconsin LLC while employed by the firm. The partners then asked Attorney Rosin additional questions, at which time Attorney Rosin admitted that he had filed patent applications for C.G.J. through the Wisconsin LLC while employed by the firm.

¶10 On December 2 and 3, 2021, Attorney Rosin provided the founding partners of the firm with records showing the work he had done through the Wisconsin LLC while employed by the firm. On December 3, 2021, Attorney Rosin sent the firm a check for $36,914.80, which represented what the firm would have collected under Attorney Rosin's compensation formula if the work he had performed and billed through the Wisconsin LLC had been performed and billed through the firm.

¶11 The above-described conduct by Attorney Rosin gave rise to the two misconduct claims that the OLR brought against Attorney Rosin in its complaint, which it filed on November 7, 2022.

Count 1: By forming [the Wisconsin LLC] to advance his own financial interests while employed by the firm; soliciting a firm client and providing services to that client outside the firm; billing, collecting and retaining for himself legal fees that should have been billed through the firm; soliciting another potential client to provide services outside the firm; and making misrepresentations to the firm when initially confronted with questions about his actions, in each instance, [Attorney] Rosin violated SCR 20:8.4(c).[2]
Count 2: By forming [the Wisconsin LLC] to advance his own financial interests while employed by the firm; soliciting a firm client and providing services to that client outside the firm; billing, collecting and retaining for himself legal fees that should have been billed through the firm; soliciting another potential client to provide services outside the firm; and making misrepresentations to the firm when initially confronted with questions about his actions, in each instance, [Attorney] Rosin breached his fiduciary duty to his firm and his duty of honesty in his professional dealings with his firm, in violation of the standard of conduct set forth in [In re] Disciplinary Proceedings Against Shea, 190 Wis. 2d 560, [527 N.W.2d 314 (1995),3 actionable via] SCR 20:8.4(f).[4]

¶12 Attorney Rosin did not file an answer to the OLR's complaint. On January 24, 2023, however, the OLR and Attorney Rosin filed a stipulation whereby Attorney Rosin stipulated to all of the facts alleged and to the two counts of misconduct set forth in the complaint.

¶13 In the stipulation, Attorney Rosin states that the stipulation did not result from bargaining, and that he does not contest the facts and misconduct alleged by the OLR or the discipline sought by the OLR. Attorney Rosin further states that he fully understands the misconduct allegations; fully understands the ramifications should this court impose the stipulated level of discipline; fully understands his right to contest this matter; and fully understands his right to consult with counsel. Attorney Rosin represents that his entry into the stipulation is made knowingly and voluntarily, and that his entry into the stipulation represents his decision not to contest the misconduct alleged in the complaint or the level and type of discipline sought by the OLR.

¶14 In its memorandum in support of the stipulation, the OLR points to prior decisions in which this court imposed significant suspensions for somewhat analogous conduct. See Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Moodie, 2020 WI 39, 391 Wis. 2d 196, 942 N.W.2d 302 (imposing a six-month license suspension on an attorney who converted at least $8,665 in funds belonging to his law firm for his personal use by failing to tender billed fees to the firm or by collecting money directly from the client and writing-off his billable time; attorney had no disciplinary history, cooperated with the OLR's investigation, and expressed sincere remorse); see also In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Hotvedt, 2016 WI 93, 372 Wis. 2d 68, 888 N.W.2d 393 (imposing an 18-month license suspension on an attorney who converted over $173,000 in funds belonging to his law firm by writing-off...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT