Ogden City v. Public Service Commission
| Decision Date | 29 August 1953 |
| Docket Number | No. 7907,7907 |
| Citation | 260 P.2d 754,123 Utah 443 |
| Parties | , 2 P.U.R.3d 525 OGDEN CITY, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION et al. |
| Court | Utah Supreme Court |
Paul Thatcher, Jack A. Richards and Charles H. Sneddon, Ogden, for appellant.
E. R. Callister, Jr., Atty. Gen., Peter M. Lowe, J. Lambert Gibson and F. Gerald Irvine, Salt Lake City, for respondents.
Review of a Commission order directing the Power Co. to charge and bill its customers residing in a municipality, as a separate item, pro rata, for exactions of 'any municipality wherein is imposed any municipal franchise, occupation, sales or license tax' against the company. Affirmed.
Recently we approved a similar order in the case of the Telephone Co., 1 on application. In the instant case the Power Co. did not petition for such an order, but only for readjustment of rates. It resisted the order since it had assured local authorities it had no intention of billing local subscriber-residents for a pro rata share of the local imposition. The company's frank consistency and adherence to principle are commendable, but its private understanding hardly could bind the Commission.
The matter of billing and charging subscriber-residents in the area where such impositions occurred, arose sua sponte with the Commission at the rate hearing. No objection to statutory procedural requirements was voiced in the hearing so that discussion thereof seems unnecessary here.
The basic problem attends both cases: Whether customers in an area whose governing authority exacts taxes, fees or other imposition against the utility, should pay the cost of operation represented by the local levies, or whether all customers of the company, statewide and pro rata, should shoulder that burden.
In the present case we affirm the order of the Commission and believe it was entered within the regulatory authority with which the Commission is endowed, being supported by competent evidence. The order, incidentally, has the effect of rendering uniform the practices of the 3 regulable public service companies dispensing gas, telephone and electric services, with respect to allocation for payment, of that item of operational cost represented by the local impositions. The desirability of such uniformity cannot be gainsaid, though we do not pass on whether or not it might be a controlling factor.
Mindful of the authorities cited by Ogden as to burden and quantum of proof, with which we agree, we believe the evidence sufficient and of such character in this case as would justify a 'reasonable judging mind' to conclude as did the Commission. 2
Undeniable it is that 1) areas existed where impositions on the utility were and were not extant; 2) all subscribers, statewide and pro rata, paid such exactions; 3) after the exaction of such impositions, and upon adjustment of rates based thereon, subscribers statewide paid more for power. Those in non-imposition communities obviously received no corresponding benefit. Consequently, discrimination in some degree, was inevitable.
The Company's president asserted that in the past, because of lower unit operational costs, densely populated areas (where...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Public Service Commission
... ... It must be understood that the Commission, in approving a fixed minimum charge, has many things to take into consideration. In making a determination it would be unreasonable to expect it to fix a charge that would eliminate all inequities. This fact was recognized in Ogden City v. Public Service Commission, 123 Utah 437, [235 Ark. 824] 260 P.2d 751; Id., 123 Utah 443, 260 P.2d 754 where the following statements are found: ... 'The order of the Commission is not only an exercise of its legal authority, but appeals to basic equities,--at least eliminating one ... ...
-
City of Newport News v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. of Va., 4625
... ... This is an appeal from an order of the State Corporation Commission amending the General Exchange Tariff S.C.C.-Va.-No. 1 of The Chesapeake ... customers receiving service within the political subdivision, if the aggregate amount of such taxes ... in this State, in all matters relating to the performance of their public duties and their charges therefor; and requires that it shall prescribe ... Dept. of Public Utilities, 33 Wash.2d 896, 207 P.2d 712; Ogden ... ...
-
City of Scottsbluff v. United Telephone Co. of the West
...R.R.S.1943. See, also, Ogden City v. Public Service Commission, 123 Utah 437, 260 P.2d 751, 2 P.U.R.3d 521; Ogden City v. Public Service Commission, 123 Utah 443, 260 P.2d 754, 2 P.U.R.3d Other authorities from utility commissions in Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, M......
-
State ex rel. City of West Plains v. Public Service Commission
...of the following cases is not meant as approval of all that is said in them, we, nevertheless, call attention to: Ogden City v. Public Service Commission, Utah, 260 P.2d 751; Odgen City v. Public Service Commission, Utah, 260 P.2d 754; State ex rel. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Depa......