OH Democratic Party v. Husted

Docket Number16-3561
Decision Date23 August 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
88 cases
  • Navajo Nation Human Rights Comm'n v. San Juan Cnty.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Utah
    • October 14, 2016
    ...Sanchez , 97 F.3d at 1309. Section 2 has been interpreted to proscribe both "vote dilution" and "vote denial." Ohio Democratic Party v. Husted , 834 F.3d 620, 636 (6th Cir. 2016). "Vote-dilution" claims typically arise in the context of election district gerrymandering, see, e.g. , Thornbur......
  • VoteAmerica v. Schwab
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • November 19, 2021
    ...to rational basis" when the challenged law is "minimally burdensome" on the exercise of constitutional rights. Ohio Democratic Party v. Husted, 834 F.3d 620, 627 (6th Cir. 2016) (citing Burdick, 504 U.S. at 434, 112 S.Ct. 2059 ). If the burden is "severe," however, Anderson - Burdick leads ......
  • Mazo v. New Jersey Secretary of State
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • November 23, 2022
    ...access law requiring candidates to pay filing fee to have their names placed on the general election ballot); Ohio Democratic Party v. Husted , 834 F.3d 620, 626-36 (6th Cir. 2016) (applying Anderson - Burdick to a challenge to Ohio law that changed the first day of early absentee voting fr......
  • Tenn. State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P. v. Hargett
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • September 13, 2019
    ...make it hard to fit First Amendment challenges to election laws into ordinary constitutional categories. Ohio Democratic Party v. Husted , 834 F.3d 620, 627 (6th Cir. 2016). When a state's law " ‘severely’ burdens the fundamental right to vote, as with poll taxes, strict scrutiny is the app......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Election Law as Ideology: Toward a New Historiography of Democracy as a Function of Law
    • United States
    • Georgetown Law Journal No. 111-3, March 2023
    • March 1, 2023
    ...quoting Anderson , 460 U.S. at 788)). 80. Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396, 406–07 (6th Cir. 2020) (quoting Ohio Democratic Party v. Husted, 834 F.3d 620, 627 (6th Cir. 2016)). 81. Crawford v. Marion Cnty. Election Bd., 553 U.S. 181, 194–97 (2008) (plurality opinion) (determining that, despite......