Oil Belt Power Co. v. Touchstone
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Dunklin |
| Citation | Oil Belt Power Co. v. Touchstone, 266 S.W. 432 (Tex. App. 1924) |
| Decision Date | 14 June 1924 |
| Docket Number | (No. 10731.) |
| Parties | OIL BELT POWER CO. v. TOUCHSTONE. |
Appeal from District Court, Stephens County; C. O. Hamlin, Judge.
Action by Mrs. Ulla Touchstone against the Oil Belt Power Company and others. From judgment for plaintiff as against named defendant, it appeals. Affirmed.
Templeton, Beall, Williams & Worsham, of Dallas, J. L. Goggans, of Breckenridge, and Scott, Brelsford, Funderburk & Ferrell, of Eastland, for appellant.
Mrs. Ulla Touchstone recovered a judgment against the Oil Belt Power Company as damages resulting from the death of her minor son, Webbie Touchstone, from which the Oil Belt Power Company has prosecuted this appeal.
The Oil Cities Electric Company, F. M. Gill, and J. W. Maddox were also made defendants in the case, but a judgment was rendered in their favor, and of that judgment no complaint has been made.
The Gulf Production Company maintained, upon land which had been leased by it for oil and gas, a wooden water tank of 1,600 barrels capacity, about 16 feet high, and between 12 and 15 feet in diameter. Across the top of the tank there was a plank 6 inches wide and 2 inches thick, each end resting on the outer edge of the tank, and was supported by an upright stay which rested on the bottom of the tank. The plank was called by witnesses a "runway." Attached to the tank was a ladder provided to enable persons to go to the top of the tank and upon the plank extending across it. The top end of this ladder rested against the top edge of the tank, and was in a slanting position, the bottom end resting on the ground a few feet from the bottom of the tank. The tank was on an oil lease owned by the Gulf Production Company, and was used by that company as a supply tank for the storage of water to be used in steam boilers operated on the lease. Three electric wires extended overhead directly across the top of the tank, two of which were each a small fraction over 7 feet above the top of the tank, and the other approximately one foot higher. Those wires were uninsulated, and there was testimony sufficient to support a finding that they were owned and maintained by the appellant Oil Belt Power Company. The evidence further showed that the water tank had been erected and had been in use for about three years before the electric wires were strung above it. There was also testimony sufficient to show that no warnings were posted on the water tank or near it of the danger of coming in contact with those electric wires. The wires were supported by posts erected for that purpose, one of which was 15 or 20 feet east of the tank, and the other about the same distance west.
Plaintiff's son, Webbie Touchstone, went in swimming in the water tank mentioned above, and the evidence was sufficient to show that while so engaged he was killed by an electric current passing from one of appellant's wires extending across and above the tank. Farrell Bishop, one of his companions, testified as follows as to how the accident occurred:
Plaintiff, Mrs. Ulla Touchstone, testified as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Cox v. Des Moines Elec. Light Co.
...Power Co., 96 Wash. 386, 165 P. 87;Stedwell v. City of Chicago, 297 Ill. 486, 130 N. E. 729, 17 A. L. R. 829;Oil Belt Power Co. v. Touchstone (Tex. Civ. App.) 266 S. W. 432;Hayes v. Southern Power Co. et al., 95 S. C. 230, 78 S. E. 956;Osborn v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 86 Kan. 440, 12......
-
Cox v. Des Moines Elec. Light Co.
... ... 386 ... (165 P. 87); Stedwell v. City of Chicago, 297 Ill ... 486 (130 N.E. 729); Oil Belt Power Co. v. Touchstone ... (Tex. Civ. App.), 266 S.W. 432; Hayes v. Southern Power ... Co., 95 ... ...
-
Scott v. Pacific Power & Light Co.
... ... & P. Co. v ... Hoover, 102 Okl. 270, 229 P. 285; Mirnek v. West ... Penn Power Co., 279 Pa. 188, 123 A. 769; Oil Belt ... Power Co. v. Touchstone (Tex. Civ. App.) 266 S.W. 432; ... Appalachian Power Co. v. Hale, 133 Va. 416, 113 S.E ... 711; ... ...
-
Sullivan v. Alabama Power Co.
... ... the danger, in any place where persons may reasonably be ... expected to come in contact with it. Oil Belt Power Co ... v. Touchstone, Tex.Civ.App., 266 S.W. 432, 439; ... Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. v. Hutchins, ... Tex.Civ.App., 68 S.W.2d 1085, ... ...