Oister v. Pennsylvania

Decision Date22 June 1964
Docket NumberNo. 682,682
Citation378 U.S. 568,84 S.Ct. 1926,12 L.Ed.2d 1038
PartiesHoward OISTER v. PENNSYLVANIA. Misc
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Joseph Knox Fornance, for petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774.

Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice CLARK, Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Com. ex rel. Butler v. Rundle
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 12 de janeiro de 1965
    ...12 L.Ed.2d 1041 (1964); Muschette v. United States, 378 U.S. 569, 84 S.Ct. 1927, 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964); Oister v. Pennsylvania, 378 U.S. 568, 84 S.Ct. 1926, 12 L.Ed.2d 1038 (1964); Owen v. Arizona, 378 U.S. 574, 84 S.Ct. 1932, 12 L.Ed.2d 1041 (1964); Pea v. United States, 378 U.S. 571, 84 ......
  • State v. Ussery
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 13 de abril de 1970
    ...378 U.S. 566, 84 S.Ct. 1923, 12 L.Ed.2d 1038; Lopez v. Texas, 378 U.S. 567, 84 S.Ct. 1924, 12 L.Ed.2d 1038; Oister v. Pennsylvania, 378 U.S. 568, 84 S.Ct. 1926, 12 L.Ed.2d 1038; Muschette v. United States, 378 U.S. 569, 84 S.Ct. 1927, 12 L.Ed.2d 1039; Del Hoyo v. New York, 378 U.S. 570, 84 ......
  • Jackson v. Denno, 62
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 22 de junho de 1964
    ...201 Pa.Super. 251, 257-258, 191 A.2d 851, 854 (1963), vacated and remanded on authority of the present case sub nom. Oister v. Pennsylvania, 378 U.S. 568, 84 S.Ct. 1926; Commonwealth v. Ross, 403 Pa. 358, 365, 169 A.2d 780, 784, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 904, 82 S.Ct. 182 (1961); Commonwealth ......
  • United States ex rel. Gockley v. Myers
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 30 de abril de 1969
    ...the court below stated. See Senk v. Pennsylvania, 378 U.S. 562, 84 S.Ct. 1928, 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964) and Oister v. Pennsylvania, 378 U.S. 568, 84 S.Ct. 1926, 12 L.Ed.2d 1038 (1964). The court below stated that: "The rule enunciated in Jackson is that before a statement may be admitted in e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT