Okla. Cotton Ginners' Ass'n v. State
Decision Date | 17 October 1935 |
Docket Number | Case Number: 26638 |
Citation | 174 Okla. 243,51 P.2d 327,1935 OK 1004 |
Parties | OKLAHOMA COTTON GINNERS' ASS'N et al. v. STATE et al. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
¶0 1. Corporation Commission -- Jurisdiction Over Cotton Gins.
The jurisdiction of the Corporation Commission over certain gins, as provided by chapter 176, Session Laws 1915, p. 354, as amended (sections 3676-3683, O. S. 1931), was extended under authority of section 19, article 9, of the Constitution.
2. Same--Appeal From Orders Fixing Ginning Charges--Review Judicial and not Legislative.
Section 5 of chapter 176, Session Laws 1915 (sec. 3681, O. S. 1931.), provides for review of orders of the Corporation Commission fixing rates and charges of operators of gins by appeal to the Supreme Court, and on such appeal this court will judicially, but not legislatively, review the action of the Commission.
3. Same--Constitutional Law -- Statutory Provision Purporting to Invest Supreme Court With Legislative Authority Held Unconstitutional.
That portion of section 3681, O. S. 1931, purporting to invest this court with any legislative authority is unconstitutional as in conflict with section 1, article 4, of the Constitution.
4. Same--Statutory Procedure Provided for Fixing Ginning Charges Held Not Violative of Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of Federal Constitution.
The procedure for hearing and determination of a proceeding before the Corporation Commission to fix rates and charges for ginning as authorized by sections 18 to 34, inclusive, of article 9, of the Constitution, and sections 3676-3683, O. S. 1931, is not violative of the due process or equal protection clauses of the federal Constitution.
5. Same--Authority of Commission to Fix Reasonable Rates and Charges Applicable to All Gins Under Its Jurisdiction.
The Corporation Commission has authority to fix the rates and charges for ginners and apply the same to all gins under its jurisdiction, limited only by the requirement that said rate, so and as applied, shall be reasonable both to the gin operator and to the public. Upon claim that said rate is not reasonable, or that same contravenes any constitutional or statutory right of the gin operator, the Commission shall hear evidence and make such order as necessary to protect the rights of all parties, having due regard for the principles of reasonableness and lack of discrimination.
6. Same--Review of Orders--Rates Fixed Presumed Reasonable and Just--Conditions Justifying Judicial Interference.
Under the provisions of section 22, article 9, of the Constitution, a rate for ginning cotton fixed by the Corporation Commission is deemed prima facie reasonable and just, and an order fixing such rate is not subject to judicial interference, unless: (1) Beyond the power which it could constitutionally exercise; or (2) beyond its statutory power; or (3) based upon a mistake of law; or (4) the rate is so low as to be confiscatory and in violation of the constitutional prohibition against taking property without due process of law; or (5) if the Commission acted so arbitrarily or unjustly as to fix rates contrary to the evidence, or without evidence to support it; or (6) if the authority therein involved has been exercised in such an unreasonable manner as to cause it to be within the elementary rule that the substance and not the shadow determines the validity of the exercise of power.
Appeal from an order of the Corporation Commission by the Oklahoma Cotton Ginners Association et al. Order sustained.
Rainey, Flynn, Green & Anderson and C. E. Dudley, for plaintiffs in error.
J. B. A. Robertson, Arthur Holloway, and Holmes Baldridge, for defendants in error.
¶1 This is an appeal from an order of the Corporation CommissiOn fixing the rate for ginning cotton within the state for the year 1935-36. The appellants are the Oklahoma Cotton Ginners Ass'n and numerous owners and operators of cotton gins. The rate fixed by the Corporation Commission for said year is:
¶2 In determining the rate for ginning cotton, which is fixed annually by the Commission prior to the beginning of the ginning season, the Commission relies upon certain data furnished annually by the owners and operators of cotton gins showing the book value of each gin, the number of bales ginned gross operating revenue, net operating expenses, and the net operating revenue. Upon the data so furnished by the owner and operator of each gin the percentage of profit or loss may be computed by the Commission. This data is computed by the Commission and is used as one of the important factors in fixing the annual rate.
¶3 Pursuant to notice given on July 30, 1935, a hearing was held by the Commission, at which time there appeared various gin owners and operators and other persons who appeared in behalf of the farmers. An opportunity was given for the presentation of evidence by those present and a number of witnesses testified as to general crop conditions and economic conditions existing over the state. M. B. Louthan, auditor and accountant for the Commission, testified from an exhibit which had been prepared for the purpose of computing said rate, showing the book value, bales ginned, cost per bale profit on bagging and ties, gross operating revenue, net operating expenses, net operating revenue and percentage of loss or profit on the investment of each and every gin operating within the state of Oklahoma for six prior seasons.
¶4 At the conclusion of the hearing the Commission entered its findings of fact, and among other things it was found that the year 1934-35 was an abnormal year; that the number of bales ginned during said season, to wit, 287,363, represented the lowest number of bales ginned since the Commission was vested with jurisdiction over cotton gins operated as public utilities; that under the rate prevailing for said season, which was 30c per 100 pounds for seed (picked) cotton, and 35c per 100 pounds for snapped or bollie cotton, the gins on the west side of the state sustained a loss of 1.8 per cent. on the investment; that the gins on the east side of the state earned a profit of 2.5 per cent. on the investment; that for the entire state there was a loss of .1 per cent. and by reason of the abnormality of conditions the year of 1934-35 should be excluded in considering what would be a fair rate to be fixed for the year 1935-36. In addition thereto, the Commission found:
* * *"
¶5 It is urged by the Corporation Commission that a joint appeal from the order of the Commission cannot be prosecuted by the individual ginners or by the voluntary organization known as the Oklahoma Cotton Ginners Association. In view of our determination hereof, and of the uncertainty heretofore existing as to the nature of the appeal in such cases, and of the failure to notice the question in the case of Oklahoma Cotton Ginners' Ass'n v. Walker et al., 168 Okla. 4593333 33 P.2d 766, we shall not determine that question herein, but will go to the merits of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Com'n
... ... SWB argues that the same federal and state due process requirements which assure litigants in judicial ... he refuses to do so, this Court should exercise its Okla. Const. Art. 7, Sec. 4 superintending control over the ... 145, 15 P.2d 114 (1932); Oklahoma Cotton Ginners' Ass'n. v. State, 174 Okla. 243, 51 P.2d 327 ... ...
-
Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare Commission
... 90 P.2d 899 185 Okla. 177, 1939 OK 155 ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF OKLAHOMA et al ... enacted under authority of the police power of the state ... 3. The ... question of whether a ... Co., 59 S.Ct. 160, 83 L.Ed ... ---; Oklahoma Cotton Ginners' Ass'n v ... State, 174 Okl. 243, 51 P.2d 327 ... ...
-
Associated Indus. of Okla. v. Indus. Welfare Comm'n
... ... 2. MASTER AND SERVANT--POLICE POWER OF STATE-- Validity of Minimum Wage and Maximum Hours Laws ... Laws providing for the ... Utah, Idaho Central R. Co., 83 L. Ed. 170; Oklahoma Cotton Ginners Ass'n v. State, 174 Okla. 243. 51 P.2d 327. However, the ... ...
-
Oklahoma Cotton Ginners' Ass'n v. State
... 51 P.2d 327 174 Okla". 243, 1935 OK 1004 OKLAHOMA COTTON GINNERS' ASS'N et al. v. STATE et al. No. 26638. Supreme Court of Oklahoma October 17, 1935 ... \xC2" ... ...