Olberding v. U.S. Dept. of Defense, Dept. of Army, 82-2192

Decision Date17 June 1983
Docket NumberNo. 82-2192,82-2192
Citation709 F.2d 621
PartiesJames K. OLBERDING, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Mark W. Bennett, Faith L. O'Reilly, Babich, Bennett & Nickerson, Des Moines, Iowa, for appellant.

Richard C. Turner, U.S. Atty., Christopher D. Hagen, Asst. U.S. Atty., Des Moines, Iowa, for appellee.

Before BRIGHT and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges, and NICHOL, Senior District Judge. *

PER CURIAM.

James K. Olberding appeals the district court's 1 dismissal of his action for damages against the Department of Defense for violation of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552a. We affirm.

The district court found that various army officers had disclosed that Olberding, then serving as a commissioned officer in the army, had undergone a psychiatric examination and that the examination revealed no mental disease or disorder. However, the district court dismissed the action on grounds that the disclosures were not made as the result of any retrieval of information from the examining psychiatrist's report on Olberding. The district court explained:

The crucial question in this case--whether there were disclosures prohibited by section 552a(b)--must be answered in the negative. The disclosures of which plaintiff complains were not made as a result of any retrieval of the disclosed information from the copy of Dr. Green's report in the Madigan Army Medical Center files. The disclosures all flowed from General Shea's order to plaintiff to report to Fort Lewis with his medical records, and from General Shea's knowledge of the psychiatric examination, which he ordered, and his knowledge of the results, which he obtained directly from Dr. Green with plaintiff's consent. Neither General Shea nor any other officer of defendant retrieved from the Madigan Army Medical Center files the psychiatric examination record or any information from that record.

It is this court's conclusion, * * * that the only disclosure actionable under section 552a(b) is one resulting from a retrieval of the information initially and directly from the record contained in the system of records. * * *

[T]he information possessed by General Shea, including the original of Dr. Green's report, did not constitute a "record" which was "contained in a system of records" within the meaning of section 552a(b), even though the information was identical to that contained in Madigan Army Medical Center's system of records. The interpretation contended for by plaintiff--that section 552a(b) is violated if agency personnel disclose information they possess by means other than retrieval from a system of records if they know or have reasonable grounds to believe that the information may also be found in a record contained in a system of records--would create an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Fagot v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico
    • April 16, 1984
    ...670 F.2d 535, 539 (5th Cir.1982); Olberding v. U.S. Dept. of Def., Dept. of the Army, 564 F.Supp. 907, 913 (S.D.Iowa 1982) aff'd. 709 F.2d 621 (8th Cir.1983); Jackson v. Veterans Administration, 503 F.Supp. 653 (D.C.Ill. 1980) there is no violation of the Act's disclosure limitations. Other......
  • Kassel v. US VETERANS'ADMIN., Civ. No. 87-217-D.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Hampshire
    • March 17, 1989
    ...without the person's prior consent." Olberding v. United States Dept. of Defense, 564 F.Supp. 907, 913 (S.D.Iowa 1982), aff'd 709 F.2d 621 (8th Cir.1983). Only information retrieved from a system of records is protected from disclosure under the Privacy Act. Saverese v. United States Dept. ......
  • Abernethy v. IRS
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • September 20, 1995
    ...522, 524 (10th Cir.1991); Thomas v. United States Dept. of Energy, 719 F.2d 342, 345 (10th Cir.1983); Olberding v. United States Dept. of Defense, 709 F.2d 621, 622 (8th Cir.1983); Krowitz v. Dept. of Agriculture, 641 F.Supp. 1536, 1543-45 (W.D.Mich. 1986); Savarese v. United States Dept. o......
  • Walia v. Holder
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • November 10, 2014
    ...on other grounds by Doe v. Chao, 540 U.S. 614, 618, 124 S.Ct. 1204, 157 L.Ed.2d 1122 (2004) (quoting Olberding v. United States Dep't of Defense, 709 F.2d 621, 622 (8th Cir.1983) ). Consequently, if an agency discloses information obtained independently of any such records, such as from per......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT