Old Ben Coal Corp. v. Local U. No. 1487 of United Mine Wkrs.

Decision Date14 April 1972
Docket NumberNo. 71-1243.,71-1243.
Citation457 F.2d 162
PartiesOLD BEN COAL CORP., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LOCAL UNION NO. 1487 OF UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

Duncan B. Cooper, III, William J. Voelker, Jr., Peoria, Ill., for defendant-appellant.

Roger Edgar, Veryl L. Riddle, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff-appellee; Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, St. Louis, Mo., of counsel.

Before SWYGERT, Chief Judge, HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge, and FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge.

FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge.

The district court permanently enjoined Local Union No. 1487 of the United Mine Workers of America (the Union) from engaging in any strike at certain mines of the Old Ben Coal Corporation (the Company) over the discharge of Eugene Dodd. The Union was also enjoined from engaging in any strikes over arbitrable grievances which might arise in the future during the term of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1968. The parties were ordered to submit disputes to adjustment as provided by the agreement.

The Company had discharged the employee for sleeping on the job. Because of this dismissal, the members of the Union walked off their jobs on several occasions. The district judge found that the strike over Dodd's dismissal was the thirteenth in a series of fourteen strikes that had occurred at the Company's mines since the effective date of the 1968 agreement. He also found that each of these strikes was over a dispute which both parties were contractually bound to arbitrate, that they had caused the Company irreparable harm, and that such strikes would continue unless enjoined. He therefore included in his decree a provision enjoining the Union from engaging in a strike over any future dispute subject to adjustment under the grievance procedures of the contract.

On this appeal, the Union challenges both the district court's authority to grant the injunction and the scope of the injunction.

Authority of District Court to Grant the Injunction.

In Boys Markets v. Clerks Union,1 the Supreme Court held that § 4 of the Norris-La Guardia Act2 does not prohibit federal district courts from enjoining a strike which violates a no-strike obligation under a collective bargaining agreement providing for mandatory arbitration of the particular dispute. There was an explicit no-strike obligation in the agreement before the Court in Boys Markets, but one may also be implied from a provision compelling arbitration.3

The principal issue to be resolved upon this appeal is whether or not the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1968 contains a mandatory arbitration provision with an attendant no-strike obligation. The Union asserts that the district judge erred in his finding that it did because: (1) the disputes settlement provisions of the contract which culminate with arbitration were not mandatory in that both parties were not contractually obligated to pursue them; and (2) a no-strike obligation cannot be implied from the terms of the 1968 wage agreement. We do not agree with either of these contentions.

The Union's contention that only the Union and not the Company was bound to arbitrate the dispute over Dodd's dismissal is at variance with the plain language of the collective agreement. Clause three of the "Miscellaneous" section of the agreement provides:

"3. The United Mine Workers of America and the operators agree and affirm . . . that all disputes and claims which are not settled by agreement shall be settled by the machinery provided in the `Settlement of Local and District Disputes\' section of this agreement unless national in character in which event the parties shall settle such dispute by free collective bargaining as heretofore practiced in the industry, it being the purpose of this provision to provide for the settlement of all such disputes and claims through the machinery in this contract provided and by collective bargaining without recourse to the courts." (Emphasis added.)

Furthermore, the section of the agreement on "Settlement of Local and District Disputes" provides for a five-step grievance procedure which culminates in arbitration and a decision which "shall be final". A decision reached at any stage of the procedure "shall be binding on both parties . . . ."

In our opinion the language is not ambiguous and obliged both the Company and the Union to submit disputes such as the discharge of Dodd to arbitration unless settled at an earlier step of the grievance procedure.

The Union supports its second contention by reliance on the first clause in the "Miscellaneous" section of the agreement which expressly repealed any no-strike clause contained in the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1945. Because of this, the Union argues that there can be no implication of a no-strike obligation as to matters subject to mandatory arbitration.

This provision reads:

"1. Any and all provisions in either the Appalachian Joint Wage Agreement of June 19, 1941, or the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of April 11, 1945, containing any `no strike\' or `penalty\' clause or clauses or any clause denominated `Illegal Suspension of Work\' are hereby rescinded, cancelled, abrogated and made null and void."

The same provision has evidently been included in each successive agreement since 1947, and the question of its effect on the implication of an obligation not to strike over disputes which the agreement required to be submitted to arbitration has been considered in several cases. A no-strike obligation was deemed implied in Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corporation4 and in Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers of America.5 The opposite conclusion was reached in International Union, United Mine Workers of America v. NLRB.6 In the last named case, then Circuit Judge Burger dissented, saying in part:

"The majority opinion rests its reversal of the Labor Board action on the ground that the collective bargaining contract does not contain an affirmative `no
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Central Appalachian Coal Co. v. UNITED MINE WKRS. OF AM.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of West Virginia
    • May 10, 1974
    ... ... include the United Mine Workers of America (UMW), District 17 of the UMW (District 17), and Local Unions Nos. 9051, 9619, 3610, and 9586 of the UMW (hereinafter sometimes collectively "Locals") ... Milk Drivers Union, Local 753, et al., 249 F.Supp. 644 (N.D.Ill. 1966); United States Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America, 320 F. Supp. 743, 746 (W.D.Pa.1970); United States Steel Corp ... See Old Ben Coal Corp. v. Local Union No. 1487, UMWA, et al., C.A.No.72-205-D (E.D. Ill. June 8, 1973). See also, Bethlehem Mines Corp. v. UMWA, ... ...
  • U.S. Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • September 24, 1975
    ...exactly what conduct is proscribed.Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2955 at 536-37 (1973).21 In Old Ben Coal Co. v. UMW Local 1487, 7 Cir. 1972, 457 F.2d 162, the court narrowed a prospective injunction to the dispute at hand, but warned the union that continued strikes could......
  • Complete Auto Transit, Inc v. Reis
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 4, 1981
    ...temporary or permanent injunction in any case involving or growing out of any labor dispute. . . ." 6. Compare Old Ben Coal Corp. v. Local 1487, UMW, 457 F.2d 162 (C.A. 7 1972), with Old Ben Coal Corp. v. Local 1487, UMW, 500 F.2d 950, 952 (C.A. 7 1974). See Gould, On Labor Injunctions Pend......
  • U.S. Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • May 20, 1976
    ...that it could not strike over arbitrable grievances might result in a broad prospective injunction. Old Ben Coal Corp. v. Local 1487, UMW, 457 F.2d 162, 168 (7th Cir. 1972) (Old Ben I ). In Old Ben II it relied on Boys Markets and Old Ben I without discussing the limitations of the Boys Mar......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT