Old Nat Bank of Evansville, Ind v. Nat Bank of Peoria, Ill
Decision Date | 07 January 1895 |
Docket Number | GERMAN-AMERICAN,No. 85,85 |
Citation | 15 S.Ct. 221,39 L.Ed. 259,155 U.S. 556 |
Parties | OLD NAT. BANK OF EVANSVILLE, IND., v. NAT. BANK OF PEORIA, ILL |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
This case was tried by the court, a jury having been waived. A special finding of facts was made. From this it appears that during the month of June, 1887, the Fidelity National Bank of Cincinnati, Ohio (hereinafter called the Fidelity Bank), and the German-American Bank of Peoria, Ill. (hereinafter called the German-American Bank), the plaintiff in the court below, were mutually transacting the business of collecting mercantile paper each for the other, and were keeping ledger accounts with each other, under a contract entered into in the month of September, 1886. This contract was made by correspondence, which resulted in an acceptance by the German-American Bank of the following proposition of the Fidelity Bank: 'We will credit sight items on any point in the United States east of Illinois, where there are banks, at par; and make collections on same points, which, when paid, will credit at par.'
On June 14, 1887, the German-American Bank purchased from the Great Western Distilling Company of Peoria a draft, of which the following is a copy:
'Great Western Distilling Co., Distillers and Refiners of Spirits.
'$6,926.15. Peoria, Ills., June 14th, 1887.
'At sight pay to the order of Weston Arnold, cashier, sixty-nine hundred twenty-six 15-100 dollars.
J. B. Greenhut, Sec. and Treas.
'To Terre Haute Distilling Co., Terre Haute, Ind.
'No. 4,357.'
—And on the same day transmitted it to the Fidelity Bank in the following letter:
'Peoria, Ills., June 14th, 1887.
'Ammi Baldwin, Esq., Cash., Cin'ti, O.—Dear Sir: Inclosed find for collection and credit items as stated below.
'Respectfully yours,
'Weston Arnold, Cashier.
'Return at once if unpaid, giving reasons; protest all paper unless otherwise instructed.
'Terre Haute Dist. Co. .......... No pro $6,926.15.'
At the time of its transmission it was indorsed:
'Pay fidelity National Bank of Cincinnati, O., or order, for collection for German-American Nat'l Bank of Peoria, Ills.
'W. Arnold, Cash.'
—This indorsement being made by a rubber stamp, which had been forwarded to the German-American Bank by the Fidelity Bank. At the time the German-American Bank transmitted this draft to the Fidelity Bank it credited cash with the full amount of said draft, and charged the same to the said Fidelity Bank in its ledger account with said bank as a debit against the said Fidelity Bank. Such entries were made in pursuance of the right which the plaintiff claimed to have under its said contract and the custom of bankers, a custom expressly found to exist throughout the United States, to enter, at the time of transmission, sight paper transmitted to the said Fidelity Bank for collection upon its ledger account with the said Fidelity Bank; and were provisional, in that the plaintiff at the time of making said entries intended to exercise the right, which it also claimed to have under its said contract with the said Fidelity Bank and the like custom of bankers, to cancel each of said entries by a counter entry in case the draft was not paid. The making of such entries was not communicated to the Fidelity Bank. The draft was also before its said transmission to the Fidelity Bank entered on the remittance register of the German-American Bank as remitted to the Fidelity Bank.
The German-American Bank never at any time drew drafts upon the Fidelity Bank against collections transmitted to it until it had received from the latter notice of payment thereof. Upon the receipt of this draft, on June 15, 1887, no entry representing it was made by the Fidelity Bank in its general ledger account with the German-American Bank, but only on the collection register. Between the Fidelity Bank and the Old National Bank of Evansville, Ind. (hereinafter called the Old National Bank), the defendant in the court below, there then existed an arrangement for mutual and reciprocal collection business; and on June 16th the draft was forwarded by the former to the latter bank, with this additional indorsement: The letter inclosing the draft was in these words:
'Cincinnati, 6/16, 1887.
'Old National Bank, _____, Cashier, Evansville, Ind.—Dear Sir: I inclose for collection and credit as below stated.
'Very respectfully yours,
'Ammi Baldwin, Cashier.
On June 18th the Old National Bank acknowledged receipt by postal card, as follows:
'Evansville, Ind., June 18th, 1887.
'I have received your favor of the 16th, with stated inclosure.
'Entered for coll.
'Yours, respectfully,
'Henry Reis, Cashier.'
No entry was made by it at the time on its ledger account with the Fidelity Bank, but only in its collection register. On June 18th the draft was forwarded to the First National Bank of Terre Haute, received by the latter on June 20th, and paid to it by the Terre Haute Distilling Company on the afternoon of that day between 2 and 3 o'clock. On the same afternoon a letter was written by the First National Bank to the Old National Bank, advising the latter of the payment of the draft, and that its amount had been credited to the account of the latter, which letter was posted at about 4 o'clock of the same afternoon. The letter was received by the Old National Bank at or about 8 o'clock on the morning of June 21st. During the month of June, 1887, the banking hours of these banks were from 9 o'clock in the forenoon continuously until 3 o'clock in the afternoon, and, the letter having been received before banking hours of the 21st, the amount of the draft was, in accordance with its general practice, entered by the Old National Bank in its account with the Fidelity Bank as a credit to the latter as of June 20, 1887.
On June 21, 1887, the Old National Bank wrote and mailed to the Fidelity Bank a letter, notifying the latter of the payment of the draft and the entry to its credit. This letter was received by the persons in charge of the Fidelity Bank on June 22d.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Independent District of Pella v. Beard
... ... National Bank of Pella funds belonging to plaintiff, and that ... on the 1st day of ... v. Armstrong (1893) 148 U.S. 50, 13 Sup.Ct. 533, and ... Evansville Bank v. German-American Nat. Bank (1895) ... 155 U.S. 556, 15 Sup.Ct ... ...
-
ZVI Guttman v. Constr. Program Grp. (In re Railworks Corp.)
...58, 59, 13 S. Ct. 533, 37 L. Ed. 363; Marine Bank v. Fulton County Bank, 2 Wall. 252, 17 L. Ed. 785; Evansville Bank v. German-American Bank, 155 U. S. 556, 15 S. Ct. 221, 39 L. Ed. 259; National Butchers' & Drovers' Bank v. Hubbell, 117 N. Y. 384, 396, 22N. E. 1031, 7 L. R. A. 852, 15 Am. ......
-
Dakin v. Bayly
...360, 17 S.Ct. 835, 42 L.Ed. 192, or by any subsequent action taken by any party to the transaction, Evansville Bank v. German-American Bank, 155 U.S. 556, 15 S.Ct. 221, 39 L.Ed. 259. What, then, was the situation as disclosed by the record, when the St. Petersburg bank closed its doors? Tha......
-
Irwin v. Reeves Pulley Co.
...Bank v. Weis, 61 Tex. 331;Blaine v. Bourne, 11 R. I. 119; Bradstreet v. Everson, 72 Pa. St. 124; Evansville Bank v. German-American Nat. Bank, 155 U. S. 556, 15 Sup. Ct. 221. It is true, it has been held that a person “acting without reward, except the privilege of using the money, was not ......