Oliver v. Bell
Decision Date | 05 April 1939 |
Docket Number | No. 6828.,6828. |
Citation | 103 F.2d 760 |
Parties | OLIVER et al. v. BELL. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Henry O. & Oliver Evans, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Henry O. Evans and Oliver Evans, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for appellants.
James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, J. Louis Monarch, and John E. Garvey, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Charles F. Uhl, U. S. Atty., of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
Before DAVIS, MARIS, and BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judges.
This was a suit by plaintiffs to recover $444,492.10 which they, as executors of the estate of David B. Oliver, deceased, paid to defendant on a deficiency assessment of estate taxes made against the estate of David B. Oliver because in his lifetime he transferred to his children and grandchildren "in contemplation of death" certain property which they did not include in his gross estate when making the tax return.
The learned district judge, before whom the case was tried without a jury, determined as a fact that the property was transferred "in contemplation of death".
Mr. Oliver died testate on October 21, 1934, at the age of 99 years, 11 months and 11 days. He left a last will and testament bearing date April 6, 1932, which was duly probated and on which letters testamentary were issued. His executors in due time filed an estate tax return purporting to show the tax due on the estate, which they paid.
On April 4, 1932, two days before his will was executed, he transferred to each of his four daughters, to each of his two sons and to two grandchildren, the children of a deceased son, the following shares of stock:
180 Aluminum Company of America Common 180 Anaconda Copper Mining Company Common 750 Armstrong Cork Company, Common 1543 Harbison Walker, Common 121 National Union Fire Insurance Company 2403 Phelps-Dodge Corporation, Capital stock 400 Pittsburgh Coal Company, Pfd 464 Sinclair Consolidated Oil Corporation Common 2643 Socony Vacuum Oil Corporation Capital stock 600 Timken Roller Bearing, Common 714 United States Steel, Pfd.
The gifts to the daughters and grandsons were in trust with remainders over but those to the two sons were "outright", absolute gifts.
As above stated the property so transferred was not included in the gross estate in the return made by the executors. But on final audit the commissioner determined that the transfers made on April 4, 1932, were gifts made "in contemplation of death", were substituted for testamentary dispositions and should have been included in the gross estate.
The value of the property transferred was $1,526,732.67 on which the commissioner, under the applicable provisions of the Revenue Act of 1926, assessed a tax of $438,288.00, which, with interest, totaled $444,492.10.1 This was paid and suit was brought to recover the payment thereof.
These transfers were made two and one-half years before the death of the decedent and when he was over ninety-seven years of age.
The plaintiffs alleged that the growing needs and expenses of decedent's children and the curtailment of their income, together with his desire to give them and their families every advantage, were the reasons and the only reasons that induced him to make the transfers.
This the commissioner denies and contends that the transfers were made "in contemplation of death" in order to avoid the payment of high taxes on testamentary gifts.
A jury was waived by the parties and the case was tried to the judge without a jury. He found as a fact that the transfers were made "in contemplation of death". His findings of fact have the force and effect of a finding by a jury and may not be disturbed if there was any substantial evidence to support them. Enterprise Coal Company v. Phillips, 3 Cir., 84 F.2d 565.
Accordingly there are two questions before us. The first is whether or not there was any substantial evidence to support the finding by the learned trial judge that the transfers were made "in contemplation of death", and the second is whether or not he erred in admitting and rejecting evidence.
A great deal of evidence was produced by the plaintiffs to show that the decedent made the transfers to supply the needs of his children and their families and to give them "every advantage" which he felt they should have. After reviewing the evidence the learned trial judge in his opinion said:
In support of this conclusion he found the following specific facts:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Koch v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
...Koch and Daisy Koch. 3 Cf. Flack v. Holtegel, 7 Cir., 93 F.2d 512; Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Bowers, 2 Cir., 98 F.2d 794; Oliver v. Bell, 3 Cir., 103 F.2d 760; Smails v. O'Malley, 8 Cir., 127 F.2d 410; McGrew's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6 Cir., 135 F.2d 158. 4 Cf. Unite......
-
Smails v. O'MALLEY
...property was not transferred in contemplation of death. Wickwire v. Reinecke, 275 U.S. 101, 105, 48 S.Ct. 43, 72 L.Ed. 184; Oliver v. Bell, 3 Cir., 103 F.2d 760. On a motion for a directed verdict by any party the court is required to consider the substantial evidence and all the inferences......
-
McGrew's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
...representative of the decedent who attacks the assessment. Wickwire v. Reinecke, 275 U.S. 101, 48 S.Ct. 43, 72 L.Ed. 184; Oliver v. Bell, 3 Cir., 103 F.2d 760, 763; Smails v. O'Malley, 8 Cir., 127 F.2d The Supreme Court held, in Colorado Nat. Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 305 U.......
-
Wishard v. United States
...even though the transfer occurred more than two years before decedent's death. Smails v. O'Malley, 8 Cir., 127 F.2d 410; Oliver v. Bell, 3 Cir., 103 F.2d 760. By finding that the transfer was not made in contemplation of death, the trial court held that plaintiff had sustained this burden. ......