Oliver v. Oliver
Decision Date | 17 February 1899 |
Citation | 178 Ill. 527,53 N.E. 303 |
Parties | OLIVER v. OLIVER et al. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from circuit court, McLean county; Colostin D. Myers, Judge.
Scire facias, by Revilo Oliver against Edward R. Oliver and others to revive a judgment. From a ruling of the court quashing the writ, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Tipton & Tipton and H. P. Beach, for appellant.
Ezra M. Prince and Charles L. Capen, for appellees.
Henry H. McDowell, pro se.
The following statement of this case is made by the appellant in this court: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Warren v. Nix
...and the sureties on their official bonds, the bank and the stockholders of the bank." 15 Am. & Eng. Enc. Pl. & Pr. 481-2; 1 Cyc. 644; 53 N.E. 303; 39 Am. Dec. 628; 17 Id. 569; 12 Id. 684; 27 S.E. 352; 38 S.E. 510; Kirby's Dig. § 990. Powell & Taylor and C. W. McKay, for appellant J. O. Hutc......
-
Hume v. Town of Blackberry, 84-0047
...in his personal capacity and on the other in his official character. McElhanon v. McElhanon (1872), 63 Ill. 457; Oliver v. Oliver (1899), 178 Ill. 527, 529, 53 N.E. 303; compare 59 Am.Jr.2d Parties sec. 6 We conclude plaintiff Hume was properly dismissed as a party and note defendants do no......
-
Oliver v. Oliver
...McLean circuit court, where the said judgment was rendered, to revive the judgment, and that they were still pending. See Oliver v. Oliver, 178 Ill. 527 53 N. E. 303, for the proceedings in, and decision of, that case. Appellant also filed his intervening petition, in which he set up said j......