Olmstead v L.C., 98536

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtGinsburg
Citation144 L.Ed.2d 540,119 S.Ct. 2176,527 U.S. 581
PartiesSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 119 S.Ct. 2176 138 F.3d 893, affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.536 TOMMY OLMSTEAD, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, et al., PETITIONERS v. L. C., by JONATHAN ZIMRING, guardian ad litem and next friend, et al. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT [
Docket Number98536
Decision Date22 June 1999
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
857 practice notes
  • Workforce Investment Act of 1998; implementation of nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions,
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 12, 1999
    • November 12, 1999
    ...This definition is derived from the Supreme Court's interpretation of the term in the ADA Title II case of Olmstead v. Zimring, 119 S.Ct. 2176, 67 USLW 3683, 67 USLW 4567, 1999 WL 407380 (U.S., June 22, 1999), at 12-13 and Grantmaking agency: This term replaces the term ``granting agency'' ......
  • Leocata ex rel. Gilbride v. Wilson-Coker, No. 3:02 CV 1066 CFD.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • November 3, 2004
    ...the least restrictive setting possible. In support of her ADA claim, Leocata argues that the Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581, 119 S.Ct. 2176, 144 L.Ed.2d 540 (1999), requires that Medicaid fund the cost of Leocata's preferred residence. The Olmstead respondents were......
  • Swanston v. City of Plano, Tex., Civil Action 4:19-cv-412
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Court of Eastern District Texas
    • August 27, 2021
    ...regulations implementing provisions of Title II, including § 12132's discrimination proscription, ” Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring, 527 U.S. 581, 591 (1999), and the implementing regulations “mirror” § 12132 by “requir[ing] that all services shall be accessible to the disabled, ” Frame v.......
  • Wright v. Carroll Cnty. Bd. of Educ.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • August 26, 2013
    ...the statute, and therefore "neither ha[d] obligations under Title II of the ADA." Id. at 846 (citing Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring, 527 U.S. 581, 589 (1999)); see also Edison v. Douberly, 604 F.3d at 1310 (11th Cir. 2010) ("A private contractor does not . . . become liable under Title II......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
804 cases
  • Wessel v. Glendening, No. 00-6634.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • September 26, 2002
    ...II does not require that a state make accommodations irrespective of inconvenience and expense. See Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring, 527 U.S. 581, 603-04, 119 S.Ct. 2176, 144 L.Ed.2d 540 (1999) (holding that a state may take into account cost and available resources in determining whether ......
  • Leocata ex rel. Gilbride v. Wilson-Coker, No. 3:02 CV 1066 CFD.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • November 3, 2004
    ...the least restrictive setting possible. In support of her ADA claim, Leocata argues that the Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581, 119 S.Ct. 2176, 144 L.Ed.2d 540 (1999), requires that Medicaid fund the cost of Leocata's preferred residence. The Olmstead respondents were......
  • Swanston v. City of Plano, Tex., Civil Action 4:19-cv-412
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Court of Eastern District Texas
    • August 27, 2021
    ...regulations implementing provisions of Title II, including § 12132's discrimination proscription, ” Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring, 527 U.S. 581, 591 (1999), and the implementing regulations “mirror” § 12132 by “requir[ing] that all services shall be accessible to the disabled, ” Frame v.......
  • Ability Center, Toledo v. City of Sandusky, No. 03-3277.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • October 1, 2004
    ...by 28 C.F.R. § 35.151. The Court also indicated that Title II targets more than intentional discrimination in Olmstead v. L. C., 527 U.S. 581, 119 S.Ct. 2176, 144 L.Ed.2d 540 (1999). Although it did not fully define the bounds of discrimination under the ADA, the Court stated that Congress ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 books & journal articles
  • Disability Law and HIV Criminalization.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 130 Nbr. 6, April 2021
    • April 1, 2021
    ...a "person [who] is a carrier of the virus that causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome"). (121.) Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring, 527 U.S. 581, 598 (1999). While Olmstead concerned claims about the segregation of people with disabilities in institutions, the Court's analysis emphasized t......
  • A WOMAN'S CHOICE? THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DOWN SYNDROME ABORTION BANS AND THE BREAKDOWN OF THE DOCTOR-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP.
    • United States
    • Case Western Reserve Law Review Vol. 71 Nbr. 2, December 2020
    • December 22, 2020
    ...www.cdc.gov/features/sleep-heart-health/index.html [https: //perma.cc/Z B7B-353U] (last updated Dec. 3. 2018). (91.) Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581, 589-90 (1999). But the Court made two observations of the exclusion of those with disabilities from public life. First, the "institutional pla......
  • Capital Punishment and the Mentally Retarded Offender
    • United States
    • Prison Journal, The Nbr. 84-3, September 2004
    • September 1, 2004
    ...329 U.S. 459 (1947).McCarver v. North Carolina, 532 U.S. 941 (2001a).McCarver v. North Carolina, 533 U.S. 975 (2001b).Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999).Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001).Penry v. Lynaugh,492 U.S. 302 (1989).Reed, E. F. (1993). The Penrypenalty: Capital punishment and......
  • THE FAILED FEDERALISM OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING: WHY STATES DON'T USE HOUSING VOUCHERS.
    • United States
    • Michigan Law Review Vol. 121 Nbr. 2, November 2022
    • November 1, 2022
    ...are generally connected to supportive housing programs and often are funded by Medicaid or tied to obligations under Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999). See, e.g., BERGQUIST ET AL., supra note 120, at 30 (Delaware); id. at 35 (Georgia); id. at 43 (Iowa). Approximately one-third of state ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 provisions

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT