Olsen v. City of New York
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Citation | Olsen v. City of New York, 373 N.Y.S.2d 214, 49 A.D.2d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975) |
| Decision Date | 06 October 1975 |
| Parties | Karen OLSEN, etc., et al., Respondents, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant. |
W. Bernard Richland, Corp. Counsel, New York City (Nina G. Goldstein and L. Kevin Sheridan, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Nathan R. Shapiro, New York City (Mark E. Arroll, New York City, of counsel), for respondents.
Before MARTUSCELLO, Acting P.J., and LATHAM, MARGETT, BRENNAN and SHAPIRO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term, 2nd and 11th Judicial Districts, dated January 22, 1974, which affirmed a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, entered June 18, 1971, in favor of plaintiffs.
Order and judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and complaint dismissed, without costs.
Defendant owes no duty to maintain its sidewalks and walkways in a condition reasonably safe for infant bicyclists (Rivera v. City of New York, 39 A.D.2d 606, 331 N.Y.S.2d 784, affd. 32...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Muallem v. City of New York
...297 N.E.2d 99 we again affirmed the dismissal of an infant bicyclist's complaint against the city. And, finally, in Olsen v. City of New York, 49 A.D.2d 884, 373 N.Y.S.2d 214, we reached the same result, holding (supra, p. 885, 373 N.Y.S.2d 214) that the city "owes no duty to maintain its s......
-
Muallem v. City of New York
...it "owed no duty to maintain its sidewalks and walkways in a condition reasonably safe for infant bicyclists" (Olsen v. City of New York, 49 A.D.2d 884, 885, 373 N.Y.S.2d 214, 214; Rivera v. City of New York, 39 A.D.2d 606, 331 N.Y.S.2d 784, affd. 32 N.Y.2d 726, 344 N.Y.S.2d 364, 297 N.E.2d......
-
Errante v. City of New York
...for their ordinary use and that no negligence would be charged to the City in an accident of this type. (See also: Olsen v. City of New York, 49 A.D.2d 884, 373 N.Y.S.2d 214). In another case, the same result was reached where an infant coasting on a sled upon a sidewalk was hurt when he hi......
-
Errante v. City of New York
...cases holding there is no municipal duty owed and therefore no liability to bicyclists on the sidewalk (Olsen v. City of New York, 49 A.D.2d 884, 373 N.Y.S.2d 214; Rivera v. City of New York, 39 A.D.2d 606, 331 N.Y.S.2d 784, affd. 32 N.Y.2d 726, 344 N.Y.S.2d 364, 297 N.E.2d 99; Hart v. Town......