Olsen v. The Patricia Ann, Civ. A. No. 20503

Decision Date05 June 1957
Docket Number20516.,Civ. A. No. 20503
Citation152 F. Supp. 315,1957 A. MC 1544
PartiesArthur OLSEN, Libelant, v. The Fishing Vessel PATRICIA ANN, her engine, tackle, apparel and furniture, Frederick H. Schreiber, Jr., Claimant Respondent, and The Patricia Ann Fisheries, Inc., and Raymond Bishop, Respondent Impleaded, and International Indemnity Insurance Co., Respondent Impleaded.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York

Arthur B. Sheehan, and William A. Leahy, New York City, Proctors for libellant, by Arthur B. Sheehan.

Mahar & Mason, by Frank C. Mason, New York City, Proctor for claimant.

Kreis & Kreis, by Maurice M. Kreis, New York City, Proctors for respondent impleaded, The Patricia Ann Fisheries, Inc.

RAYFIEL, District Judge.

On July 23, 1956 Arthur Olsen filed a libel in rem against the Patricia Ann, a fishing vessel, wherein he demanded damages in the sum of $25,000 for personal injuries which he had sustained on July 28, 1955, while employed as a cook on said vessel, and for maintenance and cure. He based his claim on the alleged unseaworthiness of the vessel. Thereafter the Patricia Ann was duly attached by the United States Marshal for this district, and is still under his control.

Fredrick H. Schreiber, Jr., duly appeared as claimant herein and answered the libel, denying generally the allegations of unseaworthiness, and claiming, also, the extinguishment of libelant's claim because of laches in the commencement of his action, due, in part, to the facts and circumstances next hereinafter set forth.

On September 5, 1956 the claimant filed his petition impleading Patricia Ann Fisheries, Inc. and Raymond Bishop, the respondents herein. The petition alleged that on April 6, 1956 he purchased the vessel from the respondent Patricia Ann Fisheries, Inc. for the sum of $10,000, under an agreement wherein the said respondent warranted the title thereto, and agreed, further, to indemnify the claimant against, and save him harmless from any claims outstanding against the vessel. The petition stated, in addition, that the respondent, Raymond Bishop, simultaneously with the delivery of the said agreement, and in order to induce the claimant to purchase the vessel, delivered to the latter his statement under oath to the effect that there were no claims against the vessel except those set forth in a schedule thereto annexed, which did not include the claim asserted in the libel, of which the claimant had no notice.

On August 16, 1956 the libelant filed a libel in personam against the respondent Patricia Ann Fisheries, Inc. to recover damages in the sum of $25,000 for the aforementioned injuries, and for maintenance and cure, basing his claim on the unseaworthiness of the Patricia Ann and the negligence of the respondent, its agents, servants and employees.

On October 11, 1956 Patricia Ann Fisheries, Inc. filed its petition impleading International Indemnity Insurance Company, hereinafter called International, demanding that it be required to pay any damages found to have been sustained by the libelant, the claimant and the petitioner.

By an order dated November 21, 1956 the causes of action herein were consolidated. On November 27, 1956 International's default was noted, and an order was made directing that a decree be entered against it after the trial of this action, as consolidated, for any damages adjudged in favor of the libelant against Patricia Ann Fisheries, Inc. or the Patricia Ann, to the extent of the limit of the policy issued by International, to wit, $10,000 and costs, and that a decree may be entered against International in favor of Patricia Ann Fisheries, Inc. for such damages as it might be able to prove it had sustained by reason of the breach of its contract of insurance. Pursuant to notice theretofore served on libelant's counsel, the respondent, Patricia Ann Fisheries, Inc. moved on the trial to amend its answer by adding the defense of "limitation of and exoneration from liability."

The facts follow. On or about July 20, 1955 the libelant obtained employment on the Patricia Ann as a cook, and shortly thereafter the vessel left Lind Basin, in Gravesend Bay, New York, or a point on the high seas off the coast of New Jersey, where it was to engage in dragging for scallops. At or about 4:00 p. m. on July 28 the libelant, in the course of his preparation of dinner for the crew, left the forecastle and proceeded to the deck at the stern of the vessel to obtain sea water for cooking purposes. He was carrying a pot of approximately five quart capacity. At the stern of the vessel there was a hose through which sea water was discharged from time to time to clean the scallops which had been brought aboard through the dragging operation. The libelant placed the hose into the pot, filled it with water, and then began his return to the forecastle. He had proceeded only a short distance when he suddenly fell to the deck and sustained a fracture of the right femur and other injuries. The vessel immediately returned to New York, arriving there on July 29, and the libelant was removed to the Beekman Downtown Hospital, where he remained until December 23, 1955, when, since virtually the maximum improvement in his condition had been effected, he was discharged, and requested to return for outpatient treatment, which he received on only three widely separated occasions thereafter. Maintenance payments commenced upon his discharge, and continued thereafter at the rate of $50 per week for thirty successive weeks, when they were discontinued, whereupon libelant commenced this action.

The libelant claims that his injuries were sustained when he fell to the deck of the vessel as a result of its wet and slippery surface. It is his contention that the Patricia Ann was unseaworthy, due to the presence on its deck of water, oil and so-called debris, consisting of scallops, scallop shells and starfish. While it is undoubtedly true that at various times during the operation of the vessel there was an accumulation of water, scallops and scallop shells, there was no reliable proof that there was any oil on the deck. The vessel was equipped with an auxiliary oil tank, located at the stern end of the vessel's deck, but there was very convincing evidence that the tank had been emptied of its contents not later than 48 hours after it left Lind Basin, and some 6 days prior to the accident.

There was testimony to the effect that from time to time during the scallop-cleaning operations the deck would be washed and thereby cleared of the accumulation of scallops, shells and other matter. Even if it were true that there was such debris on the deck at the time of the accident to the libelant, there was no proof whatsoever that it was responsible for his fall. The libelant testified that he did not know what caused him to slip, and there were no eyewitnesses of the accident. The libelant testified that water was continually coming through the scuppers and across the deck at the point where he fell, and (S.M. P.P. 51, 52) (S.M. p. 44) that...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Mroz v. Dravo Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • November 15, 1968
    ...246 F.2d 875, 877 (3d Cir. 1957); Roberts v. United Fisheries Vessels Co., 141 F.2d 288, 292-293 (1st Cir. 1944); Olsen v. The Patricia Ann, 152 F.Supp. 315, 318 (E.D.N.Y.1957). 10 Cf. McAllister v. Magnolia Petro. Co., 357 U.S. 221, 78 S.Ct. 1201, 2 L.Ed.2d 1272 11 Cf. Redman v. United Fru......
  • Petition of Cherokee Trawler Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • December 20, 1957
    ...Hill v. Atlantic Navigation Co., D.C.E.D.Va., 1954 A.M.C. 2150, reversed on other grounds, 4 Cir., 218 F.2d 654; Olsen v. The Patricia Ann, D.C.E.D.N.Y., 152 F.Supp. 315, 1957 A. M.C. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that Bradshaw was guilty of contributory negligence but, as this......
  • Marzean v. Nicholson Transit Co., Civ. No. 13219.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • June 5, 1959
    ...authority approving a longer period of recovery * * *." More recently (June 5, 1957) this same rule was reiterated in Olsen v. The Patricia Ann, D.C., 152 F. Supp. 315, 319 as follows: "* * * Recovery of maintenance and cure should not extend beyond the time when the maximum degree of impro......
  • United States v. deVALLET, Civ. A. No. 56-844.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • June 6, 1957

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT