Olson v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
| Decision Date | 06 November 1967 |
| Docket Number | 3328-65.,Docket Nos. 1713-65— 1716-65 |
| Citation | 49 T.C. 84 |
| Parties | SIDNEY L. OLSON AND MIRIAM K. OLSON, ET AL.,1 PETITIONERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT |
| Court | U.S. Tax Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
James C. Herndon and Sam D. Bartlo, for the petitioners.
Buckley D. Sowards, for the respondent.
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION
The petitioners on October 17, 1967, filed a motion, which respondent has approved, to revise the opinion (48 T.C. 855) filed herein on September 21, 1967.
As we understand the motion, the parties are now in agreement that the distribution by Cleveland of the 12 shares of Buffalo stock of which Sidal became the equitable owner but for which stock certificates were issued directly to Albert Schultz and Sidney Olson constituted dividends to those two persons only to the extent that the fair market value of such shares did not exceed the accumulated earnings and profits of Sidal of $78,648.15 at December 31, 1961. Accordingly the motion is granted in the following respects:
(1) to change page 856, the last line of paragraph (5) of the headnote, from ‘a total of $90,648.15’ to '$78,648.15'; (2) to change page 865, fourth paragraph, line 4, from ‘(2), assuming a constructive distribution’ to '(2), assuming a taxable constructive distribution'; and
(3) to change page 871, second paragraph, last line, from ‘a total of $90,648.15’ to '$78,648.15.'
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tollefsen v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...Bros. Cf. Ben R. Meyer, 45 B.T.A. 228; Jacob M. Kaplan, 43 T.C. 580; Sidney L. Olson, 48 T.C. 855, 870-871, and supplemental opinion 49 T.C. 84; but cf. Howard M. Taylor et al., 14 B.T.A. 863. Finally, Tollefsen argues that since the Commissioner accepted his treatment of the 1960 withdrawa......
-
Rafferty v. CIR, 71-1121.
...save the business from a substantial, present problem. See also Olson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 48 T.C. 855, 867 modified, 49 T.C. 84 (1967). In the case at bar there was, at best, only an envisaged possibility of future debilitating nepotism. If avoidance of this danger could be......
-
Transactions subsequent to a "B" reorganization.
...than not" that such a transfer will not adversely affect the "B" reorganization; see Rev. Rul. 84-30, Letter Ruling 8911067 and Olson, 49 TC 84 (1967), One or more T shareholders exchanges (transfers or sells) services, a covenant not to compete, land, T warrants, T options, T debentures an......