Olson v. State Bank, Nos. 11,056 - (174).
Court | Supreme Court of Minnesota (US) |
Writing for the Court | Collins |
Citation | 72 Minn. 320 |
Parties | HANS H. OLSON v. STATE BANK and Others. |
Docket Number | Nos. 11,056 - (174). |
Decision Date | 20 May 1898 |
v.
STATE BANK and Others.
Page 321
Appeals by William J. Hahn, as receiver in the above entitled action, and John W. Arctander, as attorney of said receiver, from an order and supplemental order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, Simpson and Lancaster, JJ., made respectively on January 3, and January 13, 1898, on the hearing of the receiver's account and report, disallowing in part the claim and account of
Page 322
said attorney, and more particularly the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, tenth, and eleventh items thereof. Reversed.
Exhibit C, referred to in the opinion, was as follows:
William J. Hahn,
1896. 1. Mch. 11. To consultation with Receiver as to Rice payment and how affect judgment ........ $ 5.00 2. Mch. 19. To consultation with Receiver on Ames protest of payment and course to take as to costs ............................... 5.00 3. To examination of satisfaction Ames judgment and consultation on how to draw it so as not to affect other claims ......... 5.00 4. Mch. 21. To consultation with Receiver with reference to transcripts of judgment to different counties ................................ 5.00 5. Mch. 22 to May 30, and Aug. 5 to Sept. 10. To investigating law and precedents on proceedings against foreign stockholders (over 3 months' time) ................... 1,500.00 6. Aug. 14. To consultation with Receiver as to property held by Smith & Pillsbury ............... 5.00 1897. 7. Feb. 24. To investigation of standing of H. M. No-well and making application for compromising judgment against him for $3,500.00 50.00 8. Mch. 1 to Apr. 1. To examining law as to whether attachment would lie against a defendant after judgment against other defendants, and commencing attachment proceedings and bringing Catherine C. Chadbourn into court, and for bringing about payment by her of the full claim against her ($8,000.00) ............................. 1,000.00 9. May 15. To paid Logan Breckenridge for investigating property of defendant Catherine C. Chadbourn in Olmsted Co., and for services with reference to attachment of same .................................... 75.00 10. May. To examination on proposal of release of judgment against three properties of defendant
Page 323
Tharalson, mortgaged for a consideration of $150.00, and three consultations with Receiver on same ................... 25.00 11. June, July and Aug. To repeated efforts to secure payment from C. A. Smith, involving several interviews with Receiver, Smith and Paine's attorneys (whereby over $1,400.00 obtained for Receiver) .................. 25.00 12. Sept. 10-96 to July 15-97. To examination of records of Register of Deeds in 30 counties for property of different defendants, especially Chadbourn's ............................ 300.00 13. Mch. 19-96 to Aug. 17-97. To drawing and executing ten (10) satisfactions of judgment. 50.00 14. Aug. 25-97. To paid Green & Wilson for examination of records of Hennepin Co., and furnishing abstracts of Chadbourn's transfers ..................................... 50.00 15. Oct. 26, 27. To trip to Chicago, consultation with attorneys there and negotiations with H. S. Durand, and bringing about settlement of his stock liability. (Expenses included.)...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dalliba v. Winschell
...54, 32 P. 157; Wilkinson v. Washington Trust Co., 102 F. 28, 42 C. C. A. 140. See, also, 23 Ency. of Law, p. 1068; Olson v. State Bank, 72 Minn. 320, 75 N.W. 378.) Section 3318 of the Revised Statutes provides that a receiver may be appointed by a court or judge. Section 4333, prescribing t......
-
King v. Premo & King, Inc., No. 522
...duty of the receiver to look after such matters; Deputy v. Delmar Lumber Mfg. Co., 10 Del.Ch. 101, 85 A. 669; Olson v. State Bank, 72 Minn. 320, 75 N.W. 378; Conover v. West Jersey Mortgage Co., 96 N.J.Eq. 441, 126 A. 855; Society for Relief of Destitute Children v. McDaniel, Sup., 148 N.Y.......
-
Shachat v. Standard Auto Supply Co.
...but may employ counsel to advise and assist him in matters of law. High on Rec'rs (4th Ed.) p. 961, § 808; Olson v. State Bank, supra [72 Minn. 320, 75 N. W. I have carefully examined the report and account of the receiver and have taken into consideration the nature of the service rendered......
-
John v. Farwell Co. v. Craney
...and the necessity for the appointment of counsel, and is in a position to know the correctness of the compensation. (Olson v. State Bank, 72 Minn. 320, 75 N.W. 378; Hickey v. Parrot Silver & C. Co., 32 Mont. 143, 108 Am.St. 510, 79 P. 698; Stuart v. Boulware, 133 U.S. 78, 10 S.Ct. 242, 33 L......
-
Dalliba v. Winschell
...54, 32 P. 157; Wilkinson v. Washington Trust Co., 102 F. 28, 42 C. C. A. 140. See, also, 23 Ency. of Law, p. 1068; Olson v. State Bank, 72 Minn. 320, 75 N.W. 378.) Section 3318 of the Revised Statutes provides that a receiver may be appointed by a court or judge. Section 4333, prescribing t......
-
King v. Premo & King, Inc., No. 522
...duty of the receiver to look after such matters; Deputy v. Delmar Lumber Mfg. Co., 10 Del.Ch. 101, 85 A. 669; Olson v. State Bank, 72 Minn. 320, 75 N.W. 378; Conover v. West Jersey Mortgage Co., 96 N.J.Eq. 441, 126 A. 855; Society for Relief of Destitute Children v. McDaniel, Sup., 148 N.Y.......
-
Shachat v. Standard Auto Supply Co.
...but may employ counsel to advise and assist him in matters of law. High on Rec'rs (4th Ed.) p. 961, § 808; Olson v. State Bank, supra [72 Minn. 320, 75 N. W. I have carefully examined the report and account of the receiver and have taken into consideration the nature of the service rendered......
-
John v. Farwell Co. v. Craney
...and the necessity for the appointment of counsel, and is in a position to know the correctness of the compensation. (Olson v. State Bank, 72 Minn. 320, 75 N.W. 378; Hickey v. Parrot Silver & C. Co., 32 Mont. 143, 108 Am.St. 510, 79 P. 698; Stuart v. Boulware, 133 U.S. 78, 10 S.Ct. 242, 33 L......