Olson v. State Bank, Nos. 11,056 - (174).

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota (US)
Writing for the CourtCollins
Citation72 Minn. 320
PartiesHANS H. OLSON v. STATE BANK and Others.
Docket NumberNos. 11,056 - (174).
Decision Date20 May 1898
72 Minn. 320
HANS H. OLSON
v.
STATE BANK and Others.
Nos. 11,056 - (174).
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
May 20, 1898.

Page 321

Appeals by William J. Hahn, as receiver in the above entitled action, and John W. Arctander, as attorney of said receiver, from an order and supplemental order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, Simpson and Lancaster, JJ., made respectively on January 3, and January 13, 1898, on the hearing of the receiver's account and report, disallowing in part the claim and account of

Page 322

said attorney, and more particularly the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, tenth, and eleventh items thereof. Reversed.

Exhibit C, referred to in the opinion, was as follows:

Bill of Attorney of Receiver for Services Rendered.

William J. Hahn,

As Receiver in Case of Hans H. Olson v. The State Bank et al., To Jno. W. Arctander, Attorney, Dr.
 1896.
                1. Mch. 11. To consultation with Receiver as to Rice
                 payment and how affect judgment ........ $ 5.00
                2. Mch. 19. To consultation with Receiver on Ames
                 protest of payment and course to take as
                 to costs ............................... 5.00
                3. To examination of satisfaction Ames judgment
                 and consultation on how to draw it
                 so as not to affect other claims ......... 5.00
                4. Mch. 21. To consultation with Receiver with reference
                 to transcripts of judgment to different
                 counties ................................ 5.00
                5. Mch. 22 to May 30, and Aug. 5 to Sept. 10. To investigating
                 law and precedents on proceedings
                 against foreign stockholders
                 (over 3 months' time) ................... 1,500.00
                6. Aug. 14. To consultation with Receiver as to property
                 held by Smith & Pillsbury ............... 5.00
                 1897.
                7. Feb. 24. To investigation of standing of H. M. No-well
                 and making application for compromising
                 judgment against him for $3,500.00 50.00
                8. Mch. 1 to Apr. 1. To examining law as to whether
                 attachment would lie against a defendant
                 after judgment against other defendants,
                 and commencing attachment proceedings
                 and bringing Catherine C. Chadbourn into
                 court, and for bringing about payment
                 by her of the full claim against her
                 ($8,000.00) ............................. 1,000.00
                9. May 15. To paid Logan Breckenridge for investigating
                 property of defendant Catherine
                 C. Chadbourn in Olmsted Co., and for
                 services with reference to attachment of
                 same .................................... 75.00
                10. May. To examination on proposal of release of
                 judgment against three properties of defendant
                

Page 323

 Tharalson, mortgaged for a consideration
                 of $150.00, and three consultations
                 with Receiver on same ................... 25.00
                11. June, July and Aug. To repeated efforts to secure
                 payment from C. A. Smith, involving several
                 interviews with Receiver, Smith and
                 Paine's attorneys (whereby over $1,400.00
                 obtained for Receiver) .................. 25.00
                12. Sept. 10-96 to July 15-97. To examination of records
                 of Register of Deeds in 30 counties
                 for property of different defendants, especially
                 Chadbourn's ............................ 300.00
                13. Mch. 19-96 to Aug. 17-97. To drawing and executing
                 ten (10) satisfactions of judgment. 50.00
                14. Aug. 25-97. To paid Green & Wilson for examination
                 of records of Hennepin Co., and furnishing
                 abstracts of Chadbourn's transfers
                 ..................................... 50.00
                15. Oct. 26, 27. To trip to Chicago, consultation with
                 attorneys there and negotiations with H.
                 S. Durand, and bringing about settlement
                 of his stock liability. (Expenses included.)
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 practice notes
  • Dalliba v. Winschell
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • August 16, 1905
    ...54, 32 P. 157; Wilkinson v. Washington Trust Co., 102 F. 28, 42 C. C. A. 140. See, also, 23 Ency. of Law, p. 1068; Olson v. State Bank, 72 Minn. 320, 75 N.W. 378.) Section 3318 of the Revised Statutes provides that a receiver may be appointed by a court or judge. Section 4333, prescribing t......
  • King v. Premo & King, Inc., No. 522
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • February 27, 1963
    ...duty of the receiver to look after such matters; Deputy v. Delmar Lumber Mfg. Co., 10 Del.Ch. 101, 85 A. 669; Olson v. State Bank, 72 Minn. 320, 75 N.W. 378; Conover v. West Jersey Mortgage Co., 96 N.J.Eq. 441, 126 A. 855; Society for Relief of Destitute Children v. McDaniel, Sup., 148 N.Y.......
  • Shachat v. Standard Auto Supply Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey County Court
    • April 16, 1930
    ...but may employ counsel to advise and assist him in matters of law. High on Rec'rs (4th Ed.) p. 961, § 808; Olson v. State Bank, supra [72 Minn. 320, 75 N. W. I have carefully examined the report and account of the receiver and have taken into consideration the nature of the service rendered......
  • John v. Farwell Co. v. Craney
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • April 25, 1916
    ...and the necessity for the appointment of counsel, and is in a position to know the correctness of the compensation. (Olson v. State Bank, 72 Minn. 320, 75 N.W. 378; Hickey v. Parrot Silver & C. Co., 32 Mont. 143, 108 Am.St. 510, 79 P. 698; Stuart v. Boulware, 133 U.S. 78, 10 S.Ct. 242, 33 L......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • Dalliba v. Winschell
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • August 16, 1905
    ...54, 32 P. 157; Wilkinson v. Washington Trust Co., 102 F. 28, 42 C. C. A. 140. See, also, 23 Ency. of Law, p. 1068; Olson v. State Bank, 72 Minn. 320, 75 N.W. 378.) Section 3318 of the Revised Statutes provides that a receiver may be appointed by a court or judge. Section 4333, prescribing t......
  • King v. Premo & King, Inc., No. 522
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • February 27, 1963
    ...duty of the receiver to look after such matters; Deputy v. Delmar Lumber Mfg. Co., 10 Del.Ch. 101, 85 A. 669; Olson v. State Bank, 72 Minn. 320, 75 N.W. 378; Conover v. West Jersey Mortgage Co., 96 N.J.Eq. 441, 126 A. 855; Society for Relief of Destitute Children v. McDaniel, Sup., 148 N.Y.......
  • Shachat v. Standard Auto Supply Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey County Court
    • April 16, 1930
    ...but may employ counsel to advise and assist him in matters of law. High on Rec'rs (4th Ed.) p. 961, § 808; Olson v. State Bank, supra [72 Minn. 320, 75 N. W. I have carefully examined the report and account of the receiver and have taken into consideration the nature of the service rendered......
  • John v. Farwell Co. v. Craney
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • April 25, 1916
    ...and the necessity for the appointment of counsel, and is in a position to know the correctness of the compensation. (Olson v. State Bank, 72 Minn. 320, 75 N.W. 378; Hickey v. Parrot Silver & C. Co., 32 Mont. 143, 108 Am.St. 510, 79 P. 698; Stuart v. Boulware, 133 U.S. 78, 10 S.Ct. 242, 33 L......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT