Omasta v. Wainwright, 81-5798
Decision Date | 31 January 1983 |
Docket Number | No. 81-5798,81-5798 |
Citation | 696 F.2d 1304 |
Parties | William R. OMASTA, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, etc., et al., Defendant-Appellee. Non-Argument Calendar. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
William R. Omasta, Jr., pro se.
Leonard George, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
Before HILL, KRAVITCH and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.
In April 1975, appellant William R. Omasta was convicted of obtaining property through the use of worthless checks and was sentenced to a term of five years. He was incarcerated pursuant to a presumptively valid judgment and commitment order issued by the Orange County, Florida Circuit Court. As secretary of Florida's Department of Corrections, appellee had a statutory duty to receive the appellant into the department's custody. See Fla.Stat.Ann. Secs. 944.16 and 944.17. 1 After he had served approximately three years of his sentence, appellant's conviction was reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. The state, however, chose not to prosecute the appellant, and he was released from custody in March 1978.
Appellant subsequently filed this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action, seeking payment at the minimum wage for the hours he worked during his three years of confinement. Appellant contends that because his conviction was reversed his incarceration was unconstitutional from its inception. Therefore, he argues, he was subjected to involuntary servitude in contravention of the thirteenth amendment 2 and should be compensated for the hours he worked while imprisoned. The district court granted summary judgment for the appellee.
This is a case of first impression in this circuit. Neither the former Fifth Circuit nor this court has addressed the precise issue presented by Omasta's claim. We are not, however, without guidance. Other circuits have held that Draper v. Rhay, 315 F.2d 193, 197 (9th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 915, 84 S.Ct. 214, 11 L.Ed.2d 153 (1963). Accord Ray v. Mabry, 556 F.2d 881 (8th Cir.1977).
We find no merit in appellant's claim and hold that where a prisoner is incarcerated pursuant to a presumptively valid judgment and commitment order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction and is forced to work pursuant to prison regulations or state statutes, the thirteenth amendment's prohibition against involuntary servitude is not implicated. This holding applies even though the conviction may be subsequently reversed. Finding no error, we affirm the grant of summary judgment to appellee Wainwright.
AFFIRMED.
1 Fla.Stat.Ann. Sec. 944.16 (West 1982) provides:
All prisoners shall be delivered to the custody of the department at such reception and classification centers as shall be provided...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Patrick v. Staples
...(8th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Jameson v. United States, 464 U.S. 942, 104 S.Ct. 359, 78 L.Ed.2d 321 (1983); Omasta v. Wainwright, 696 F.2d 1304, 1305 (11th Cir. 1983); Stiltner v. Rhay, 322 F.2d 314, 315 (9th Cir.1963), cert. denied sub nom., Stiltner v. Washington, 376 U.S. 920, 84 S.......
-
Lymon v. Aramark Corp.
...in that status until his or her appeal becomes final even if it results in a reversal of the conviction."); Omasta v. Wainwright, 696 F.2d 1304, 1305 (11th Cir.1983)(holding that, "where a prisoner is incarcerated pursuant to a presumptively valid judgment ... the thirteenth amendment's pro......
-
Fulton v. Bartik
...though the conviction may be subsequently reversed.’ " Savory , No. 17 C 204, 532 F.Supp.3d at 637–38, (quoting Omasta v. Wainwright , 696 F.2d 1304, 1305 (11th Cir. 1983), and citing Tourscher v. McCullough , 184 F.3d 236, 240–42 (3d Cir. 1999) ; Perrault v. State , 2016 WL 126918, at *3 (......
-
Alexander v. Schenk
...for a crime." United States v. Kozminski, 487 U.S. 931, 944, 108 S.Ct. 2751, 101 L.Ed.2d 788 (1988); see also, Omasta v. Wainwright, 696 F.2d 1304, 1305 (11th Cir.1983) (stating that "where a prisoner is incarcerated pursuant to a presumptively valid judgment ... the thirteenth amendment's ......