Omeluk v. Langsten Slip & Batbyggeri A/S, No. 93-35389
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | KLEINFELD |
| Citation | 52 F.3d 267 |
| Parties | Janusz OMELUK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LANGSTEN SLIP & BATBYGGERI A/S, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Docket Number | No. 93-35389 |
| Decision Date | 14 April 1995 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
271 practice notes
-
Brink v. First Credit Resources, No. Civ-97-1261-PHX-ROS.
...some minimum assurance as to where that conduct will and will not render them liable to suit.'" Omeluk v. Langsten Slip & Batbyggeri A/S, 52 F.3d 267, 270 (9th Cir.1995) (quoting Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 472, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985) (internal citations The......
-
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., No. CIV.01-08541 SVW.
...or made findings of fact.3 Ziegler v. Indian River County, 64 F.3d 470, 473 (9th Cir.1995); Omeluk v. Langsten Slip & Batbyggeri A/S, 52 F.3d 267, 268 (9th Cir.1995); Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Tech, Assoc., Inc., 557 F.2d 1280, 1285 (9th Cir.1977). For purposes of a motion to dismiss, fact......
-
Patterson v. Home Depot, USA, Inc., No. CV-09-992-PHX-GMS.
...102, 112, 107 S.Ct. 1026, 94 L.Ed.2d 92 684 F. Supp.2d 1183 (1987) (plurality opinion); see also Omeluk v. Langsten Slip & Batbyggeri A/S, 52 F.3d 267, 271 (9th Cir.1995). This is so, even if a defendant has no physical presence within the forum. Burger King, 471 U.S. at 472-73, 105 S.Ct. K......
-
Millennium Enterprises v. Millennium Music, Lp, No. 98-1058-AA.
...Asahi that jurisdiction cannot be founded on the mere presence of a product in the forum ...." Omeluk v. Langsten Slip & Batbyggeri A/S, 52 F.3d 267, 271 (9th Cir. Many cases find the "stream of commerce" theory of specific jurisdiction analogous to Website advertising, in that the person o......
Request a trial to view additional results
271 cases
-
Brink v. First Credit Resources, No. Civ-97-1261-PHX-ROS.
...assurance as to where that conduct will and will not render them liable to suit.'" Omeluk v. Langsten Slip & Batbyggeri A/S, 52 F.3d 267, 270 (9th Cir.1995) (quoting Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 472, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985) (internal citations The pla......
-
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., No. CIV.01-08541 SVW.
...or made findings of fact.3 Ziegler v. Indian River County, 64 F.3d 470, 473 (9th Cir.1995); Omeluk v. Langsten Slip & Batbyggeri A/S, 52 F.3d 267, 268 (9th Cir.1995); Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Tech, Assoc., Inc., 557 F.2d 1280, 1285 (9th Cir.1977). For purposes of a motion to dismiss, ......
-
W. States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litig. v. ONEOK, Inc., Nos. 11–16786
...not satisfied, jurisdiction in the forum would deprive the defendant of due process of law.” Omeluk v. Langsten Slip & Batbyggeri A/S, 52 F.3d 267, 270 (9th Cir.1995). While all three requirements must be met, this court has stated that in its consideration of the first two prongs, “[a]......
-
Patterson v. Home Depot, USA, Inc., No. CV-09-992-PHX-GMS.
...112, 107 S.Ct. 1026, 94 L.Ed.2d 92 684 F. Supp.2d 1183 (1987) (plurality opinion); see also Omeluk v. Langsten Slip & Batbyggeri A/S, 52 F.3d 267, 271 (9th Cir.1995). This is so, even if a defendant has no physical presence within the forum. Burger King, 471 U.S. at 472-73, 105 S.Ct. Kr......
Request a trial to view additional results