Opinion of the Justices, 6237
Decision Date | 21 April 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 6237,6237 |
Citation | 276 A.2d 817,111 N.H. 131 |
Parties | In re OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. Request of House of Representatives, |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
The following resolution was adopted by the House of Representatives March 31, 1971 and filed in this court on April 2, 1971:
'WHEREAS, there is pending before the House of Representatives, House Bill 382, an act imposing a tax on income and on retail sales, and
'WHEREAS, one part of the bill imposes a 3% tax upon retail sales of certain tangible personal property and upon certain services listed in the bill, and a proposed amendment to the bill specifically excludes a tax on meals and rooms which are taxed under RSA 78-A, and
'WHEREAS, RSA 78-A imposes a 5% tax on the charges paid for the purchase of taxable meals purchased from a person in the business of operating a restaurant and upon the occupancy of a room in a hotel as defined in RSA 78-A, and
'WHEREAS, the taxing of the sale of tangible personal property and certain services at a 3% tax, while the taxing of the purchase of meals and the occupancy of rooms at a 5% tax raises a constitutional question, now therefore be it
'RESOLVED, That the Speaker of the House is directed to obtain from the Justices of the Supreme Court, their opinion upon the following questions of law which are of serious importance to the financial welfare of the state, namely:
'Be it Further Resolved, That the speaker transmit seven copies of this resolution, of House Bill 382, and of the proposed amendment to House Bill 382 to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for consideration by the court.'
The following answer was returned:
To the House of Representatives:
The undersigned Justices of the Supreme Court reply as follows to the inquiries pertaining to House Bill 382 contained in your resolution adopted March 31, 1971 and filed with this court on April 2, 1971.
House Bill 382, Section 3 would enact a new chapter, to be entitled Chapter 78-C, 'Sales and Use Tax.' It would impose a tax of 3% on retail sales of tangible property and on the gross value of many services enumerated therein (s. 3, 78-C:2(VI)(d)(1)-(8)). It would exempt certain specified sales, some of which are otherwise taxed. S. 3, 78-C:9. The exemptions would include services in connection with 'Meals and Rooms subject to taxes imposed by RSA 78-A,' if a proposed amendment to section 3 is adopted. While the proposed amendment as submitted with your resolution refers to 'RSA 78-C:9 as inserted by section 1 of the bill,' we think it evident that section 3 of the bill is thereby intended.
Your first inquiry is as follows: 'Would any constitutional provision be violated by imposing a tax upon meals and rooms under RSA 78-A at a rate of 5% of the charge for the meal or room, and by imposing a tax of 3% upon the sale of tangible personal property and certain services as listed in House Bill 382, which would specifically exempt any tax on meals and rooms as taxed by RSA 78-A?'
We are in agreement with what was said in Opinion of the Justices, 97 N.H. 533, 535, 536, 81 A.2d 845, 848 (1951):
We also recognize as stated therein that the 'Legislature has liberal powers with respect to the classification of taxable property.' Id., 536, 81 A.2d 849. The exercise of its powers of taxation however is also subject to the requirements of equality and proportionality, (Const. pt. II, art. 5) which operate to require that all subjects of taxation within a given class shall be taxed at a uniform rate. Opinion of the Justices, 94 N.H. 506, 509, 52 A.2d 294 (1947); Opinion of the Justices, 99 N.H. 517, 113 A.2d 119 (1955); Opinion of the Justices, 106 N.H. 202, 208 A.2d 458 (1965).
Your question presents the issue of whether the services of furnishing rooms for hire, and prepared meals and beverage and accompanying services, which are taxed under RSA 78-A (supp.), are sufficiently distinguishable from other services which would be taxed under House Bill 382, as to make it apparent that just reason exists to tax them at a higher rate than the services enumerated by section 3, 78-C:9 of the bill. See Opinion of the Justices, 99 N.H. 517, 518, 113 A.2d 119, 120 (1955); Opinion of the Justices, 97 N.H. 546, 81 A.2d 853 (1951).
Services which would be taxed by the bill include 'the service of repairing, altering, mending, pressing, fitting, dyeing, laundering, dry cleaning, or cleaning tangible personal property,' the service of printing, photographing or copying, barber and beauty services to persons and animals, parking services for motor vehicles and boats, and intrastate telephonic and telegraphic services. No doubt each type of the enumerated services has some unique trait not present in the services of providing meals or rooms, but as to all services, the 'characteristic event' which justifies imposition of a tax differing from the general property tax is the same-namely, the furnishing or sale of a service. See Opinion of the Justices, 84 N.H. 559, 575, 149 A. 321, 329 (1930); Havens v. Attorney-General, 91 N.H. 115, 118-119, 14 A.2d 636, 638 (1940).
Whether the right to a prepared meal and the right to occupy a room can reasonably be considered a separate 'class of property' within the meaning of the language inserted in article 6, part II of the Constitution by the amendment of 1903, which can be distinguished from the right to other services to be taxed under House Bill 382...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Opinion of The Justices
...our constitution only requires that all subjects of taxation within a given class be taxed at a uniform rate. Opinion of the Justices, 111 N.H. 131, 134, 276 A.2d 817, 819 (1971). The question is therefore whether capital gains are sufficiently distinguishable from interest and dividends as......
-
Advisory Opinion to Governor Request of June 29, 1979, In re
...which leave affected persons, including the Court, floundering in search of applicable legal doctrines. See In re Opinion of the Justices, 111 N.H. 131, 135, 276 A.2d 817, 820 (1971); Opinion of the Justices, 347 Mass. 797, 798, 197 N.E.2d 691, 693 (1964); In re Opinions of the Justices, 69......
-
Opinion of the Justices, 7494
...might be thought to disqualify him. See Opinion of the Justices, 111 N.H. 210, 213, 279 A.2d 741, 742 (1971); Opinion of the Justices, 111 N.H. 131, 136, 276 A.2d 817, 820 (1971). FRANK R. LAURENCE I. DUNCAN DEWARD J. LAMPRON WILLIAM A. GRIMES ...
-
Opinion of the Justices, In re, 6865
...established that our legislature has liberal powers with respect to the classification of taxable property. Opinion of the Justices, 111 N.H. 131, 134, 276 A.2d 817, 819 (1971). A reasonable classification which is sufficiently inclusive to constitute a distinctive class will be upheld. Opi......