Oppenheimer v. Greencastle School Township
Decision Date | 10 January 1905 |
Docket Number | 20,420 |
Citation | 72 N.E. 1100,164 Ind. 99 |
Parties | Oppenheimer v. Greencastle School Township et al |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From Putnam Circuit Court; Presley O. Colliver, Judge.
Action by Anna Oppenheimer against Greencastle School Township and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under § 1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.
Affirmed.
Jackson Boyd and William E. Mowbray, for appellant.
Granville C. Moore and Thomas T. Moore, for appellees.
On March 16, 1901, appellant's assignor Manson U. Johnson sold to John A. Keller, trustee of appellee township, for the use of his township in schools numbered one and nine, one single and one double Ideal heater and ventilator. In Johnson's proposal for the sale appears the following provision: The acceptance was in these words:
On the same day there was executed to Johnson for the heaters what is termed a township order, as follows: Indorsed:
The evidence shows that Hillis and Graham at the time of the transaction were members of the township advisory board. Default in payment of the order having been made, appellant, Manson U. Johnson's assignee by indorsement, instituted this suit. She made Greencastle school township, John A. Keller, trustee, John L. Hillis and R. S. Graham, of the advisory board, parties defendant.
The complaint is in six paragraphs. The first declares upon the order; alleges that it was executed by Greencastle school township to Manson U. Johnson, and signed by John A. Keller, the duly elected, qualified and acting trustee of said township, John L. Hillis and R. S. Graham, members of the advisory board of said township; and that the same was sold and assigned by Johnson to appellant for value, before maturity, and without notice of any defense thereto. The second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth paragraphs set up the same facts in different forms, the substance being the needs of the township for heating apparatus, the suitableness and efficiency of the Ideal heaters, their purchase, acceptance and continued use by Greencastle school township, the execution by said township of the township order therefor, and its assignment to appellant. Some of them counted upon the quantum meruit for the sale of necessaries to the township, and some upon the township order. The separate demurrers of Keller, Hillis and Graham to each paragraph of the complaint were sustained. The separate demurrer of Greencastle school township to the first and fifth paragraphs was also sustained.
With respect to the separate demurrers of Keller, Hillis and Graham, it is alleged in each paragraph of the complaint that Greencastle school township purchased the goods, and executed to Johnson the order in suit. It is not charged in either paragraph that Keller, Hillis or Graham promised to pay the debt, or in any way obligated himself to pay it. It is clearly shown in each that these parties in the transaction were acting as public officers, and solely for the township, and they can not, under the facts alleged, be held personally liable. Pine Civil Tp. v. Huber Mfg. Co. (1882), 83 Ind. 121; State, ex rel., v. Helms, (1893), 136 Ind. 122, 35 N.E. 893; First Nat. Bank v. Osborne (1897), 18 Ind.App. 442, 48 N.E. 256. Their separate demurrers were therefore properly sustained.
The demurrer of Greencastle school township to the first paragraph of the complaint was also...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Siebrase v. Meiser
... ... 185 201 Ind. 337 State, ex rel. Siebrase et al. v. Meiser, Township" Trustee, et al No. 25,615Supreme Court of IndianaOctober 10, 1929 ... \xC2" ... Barton School Township, and certain other defendants, to ... mandate the township ... Sugar Ridge Tp. (1903), 161 Ind ... 417, 68 N.E. 896; Oppenheimer v. Greencastle ... School Tp. (1905), 164 Ind. 99, 72 N.E. 1100; ... ...
-
State ex rel. Siebrase v. Meiser
...p. 157, Acts 1899 (section 12075, Burns' 1926); Moss v. Sugar Ridge Tp. (1903) 161 Ind. 417, 68 N. E. 896;Oppenheimer v. Greencastle School Tp. (1905) 164 Ind. 99, 72 N. E. 1100;Peck-Williamson H. & V. Co. v. Steen School Tp. (1903) 30 Ind. App. 637, 66 N. E. 909. [7][8] The relators claim ......
-
Oppenheimer v. Greencastle Sch. Tp. of Putnam Cnty.
...164 Ind. 9972 N.E. 1100OPPENHEIMERv.GREENCASTLE SCHOOL TP. OF PUTNAM COUNTY et al.No. 20,420.Supreme Court of Indiana.Jan. 10, 1905 ... Appeal from Circuit Court, Putnam County; P. O. Colliver, .Action by Anna Oppenheimer against the Greencastle school township of Putnam county and others. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under Burns' Ann. St. 1901, ... ...
-
Slattery v. Sch. City of South Bend
...was correctly sustained. As pertinent to the question here involved we cite: Burns' Ann. St. 1908, § 6497; Oppenheimer v. Greencastle School Township, 164 Ind. 99, 72 N. E. 1100;Lincoln School Tp. v. American School Furniture Co., 31 Ind. App. 413, 68 N. E. 301;Peck-Williamson, etc., Co. v.......