Oppenheimer v. Moebius
| Court | California Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | SHINN |
| Citation | Oppenheimer v. Moebius, 165 Cal.App.2d 659, 332 P.2d 181 (Cal. App. 1958) |
| Decision Date | 03 December 1958 |
| Parties | John G. OPPENHEIMER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. R. MOEBIUS, Jno. J. Suman, L. R. McIntire, F. G. Wakefield, Pacific Electric Railway Company, a corporation, Defendants. Pacific Electric Railway Company, a corporation, Respondent. Civ. 23149. |
John G. Oppenheimer, in pro. per.
E. D. Yeomans, Walt A. Steiger, Los Angeles, for respondent.
Upon a former appeal by plaintiff in this cause, 151 Cal.App.2d 818, 312 P.2d 314, one of the defendants, Pacific Electric Railway Co., a respondent on the appeal, prevailed and became entitled to costs on appeal under Rule 26(c), Rules on Appeal, consisting of the reasonable costs of printing or reproduction of briefs by other process of duplication. Pacific Electric filed a cost bill for $93.18 as the amount of debt it incurred and paid for the printing of a brief. Plaintiff moved to tax costs upon the ground that the charges of the printer were unreasonably high and the expense was not necessarily incurred. In support of the motion plaintiff filed his affidavit by which he averred that the reasonable cost of the brief of the respondent was $40 which was the prevailing rate in the printing industry when the brief was printed. In opposition to the motion, the respondent filed an affidavit of Robert M. Parker, Jr., president and general manager of the firm of Parker & Son, Inc., the printer of the brief. The general tenor of the affidavit was that the charge, which included $3,58 sales tax and 20cents postage, was at the customary rate and was reasonable. Plaintiff's motion was denied...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue Associates
...This ruling finds support in the record. (See Oppenheimer v. Robinson, 163 Cal.App.2d 367, 368 [329 P.2d 318]; Oppenheimer v. Moebius, 165 Cal.App.2d 659, 660 [332 P.2d 181]; Eistrat v. Brush Industrial Lbr. Co., 156 Cal.App.2d 460, 461 [319 P.2d The ruling in this case also finds support i......
-
Harmon v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co.
...This ruling finds support in the record. (See Oppenheimer v. Robinson, 163 Cal.App.2d 367, 368, 329 P.2d 318; Oppenheimer v. Moebius, 165 Cal.App.2d 659, 660, 332 P.2d 181; Eistrat V. Brush Industrial Lbr. Co., 156 Cal.App.2d 460, 461, 319 P.2d Appellant's next contention is that 'as a resu......
-
Wilson v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Emp. Retirement Ass'n
...a charge of $1.67 per page was sustained as a proper item of cost for printing a brief of fourteen pages, and in Oppenheimer v. Moebius, 165 Cal.App.2d 659, 660, 332 P.2d 181, a charge of between $4.40 and $4.60 per page for a printed brief was Thus, in the present construction of Rule 26 t......