Orantes v. State
| Citation | 461 So.2d 115 |
| Parties | Orantes (Pierre Cesar) v. State NO. 65476 |
| Decision Date | 20 December 1984 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Florida |
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
State v. Globe Communications Corp., 91-3112
... ... State, 373 So2d 672 (Fla.1979) [F.S. 847.011(7) authorizing seizure of obscene materials was assailed both as facially invalid and unconstitutional as applied]. Orantes v. State, 452 So2d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), pet. for rev. den, 461 So2d 115 (Fla.1984) (F.S. 893.135, the mandatory drug trafficking sentencing statute attacked on motion as being unconstitutional, as applied). I conclude that the motion in the instant case is not a subs. (c)(4), Rule 3.190 Motion ... ...
-
Isom v. State, 90-2217
... ... As to count II, the evidence established an agreement to commit the criminal offense and an intention to commit it. See, e.g., Orantes v. State, 452 So.2d 68, 70-71 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 461 So.2d 115 (Fla.), review denied sub nom. Vastola v. State, 461 So.2d 116 (Fla.1984). The evidence on that count was sufficient as well ... Defendant next contends that the trial court erred by admitting into ... ...
-
Williams v. State, 91-565
... ... (1989). The crime of conspiracy consists of an express or implied agreement between two or more persons to commit a criminal offense, and the intention to commit the offense. Munroe v. State, 514 So.2d 397, 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), review denied, 519 So.2d 987 (Fla.1988); Orantes v. State, 452 So.2d 68, 70 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 461 So.2d 115 (Fla.1984); Pino v. State, 573 So.2d 151, 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Kocol v. State, 546 So.2d 1159, 1160 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Circumstantial evidence alone will support the existence of a conspiracy. Wilder v. State, 587 ... ...
-
Huff v. State
... ... However, we conclude that Schueren is inapposite. While in this case there was evidence indicating that defendant was a go-between, there was other evidence from which the jury could have concluded that defendant was to be a supplier. See Orantes" v. State, 452 So.2d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 461 So.2d 115 (Fla.1984); Brown v. State, 468 So.2d 325 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 476 So.2d 672 (Fla.1985). It is not within our province to reweigh the evidence. See Tsavaris v. NCNB National Bank, 497 So.2d 1338 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) ... \xC2" ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results