Oregon v. Ice
| Decision Date | 17 March 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. 07–901.,07–901. |
| Citation | 76 USLW 3496,552 U.S. 1256,76 USLW 3393,170 L.Ed.2d 353,128 S.Ct. 1657 |
| Parties | OREGON, petitioner, v. Thomas Eugene ICE. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Case below, 343 Or. 248, 170 P.3d 1049.
Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon granted limited to the following question: Whether the Sixth Amendment, as construed in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), requires that facts (other than prior convictions) necessary to imposing consecutive sentences be found by the jury or admitted by the defendant.
To continue reading
Request your trial
64 cases
-
State v. Allen
...147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). See Oregon v. Ice, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1657, 170 L.Ed.2d 353 (2008) (granting certiorari to consider "[w]hether the Sixth Amendment, as construed in Apprendi ... and Blakely ... requ......
-
State v. Berg
...S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), as construed in State v. Ice, 343 Or. 248, 170 P.3d 1049 (2007), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1657, 170 L.Ed.2d 353 (2008) (facts supporting imposition of consecutive sentences must be admitted or found by a The law and facts involved in that as......
-
Hernandez v. McGrath
...necessary to imposing consecutive sentences be found by the jury or admitted by the defendant." See Oregon v. Ice, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1657, 170 L.Ed.2d 353 (2008). A ruling is still pending, but oral arguments were heard on October 14, ...
-
Roettgen v. Ryan
...that facts necessary to impose consecutive sentences be found by the jury or admitted by the defendant. Oregon v. Ice, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1657, 170 L.Ed.2d 353 (2008). On January 14, 2009, the Supreme Court held: "[T]he Sixth Amendment does not inhibit States from assigning to judges, ......
Request a trial to view additional results