Orozco-Rangel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
| Decision Date | 23 January 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 74--2043,OROZCO-RANGEL and A,74--2043 |
| Citation | 528 F.2d 224 |
| Parties | Ramonltagracia Orozco-Rangel, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Before KILKENNY and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and CARR, * District Judge.
On this Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals which affirmed the deportation order of an Immigration Judge, we discern no error and affirm.
The error assigned is a lack of procedural due process because the Spanish-speaking petitioners were not sufficiently made aware of the proceedings in which they were participants.
The petitioners were served by a Spanish-speaking immigration officer who communicated with them in Spanish. An official interpreter was provided at the immigration hearing. Their own counsel spoke and understood Spanish and was given the opportunity to assist in the translation. The petitioners admitted the essential charges upon which the orders were based. No prejudice is asserted. The appeal borders on the frivolous.
Affirmed.
* Honorable Charles H. Carr, Senior United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
...1968); Ramirez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 550 F.2d 560, 565 n. 5 (9th Cir. 1977); Orozco-Rangel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 528 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1976); Leung v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 531 F.2d at 168; Haidar v. Coomey, 401 F.Supp. 717, 720 (......
-
Matter of Santos
......Interim Decision Number 2969. A-24879910. Board of Immigration Appeals. Decided by Board June 26, 1984. (1) An alien must ... ON BEHALF OF SERVICE: David B. Hopkins General Attorney. BY: Milhollan, ... institution of deportation proceedings, the Immigration and Naturalization. 19 I&N Dec. 106. Service granted the respondent the privilege of ...1979); United States v. Barraza-Leon, supra, at 221; Orozco-Rangel v. INS, 528 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1976); Chung Young Chew v. Boyd, 309 F.2d ......
-
Matter of Exilus
......Interim Decision Number 2914. A-24720564. Board of Immigration Appeals. Decided by Board August 3, 1982. (1) The ... ON BEHALF OF SERVICE: Leonard Devertz General Attorney. BY: Milhollan, ...See Ramirez v. INS, 550 F.2d 560 (9 Cir. 1977); Orozco-Rangel v. INS, 528 F.2d 224 (9 Cir. 1976); cf. Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721 ......