Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & Sa, No. 00-16509.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Sneed |
| Citation | 285 F.3d 764 |
| Parties | Robin ORR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Docket Number | No. 00-16509. |
| Decision Date | 05 March 2002 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2614 practice notes
-
Meridian Project Systems v. Hardin Const. Co., No. CIVS04-2728 FCD DAD.
...248-49, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). The determination is made based solely upon admissible evidence. Orr v. Bank of America, 285 F.3d 764, 773 (9th Cir.2002). Furthermore, the court must view inferences made from the underlying facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving p......
-
King v. Export Dev. Can. (In re Zetta Jet USA, Inc.), Case No.: 2:17-bk-21386-SK
...rather that Bombardier sent Yuntian 4 three "Termination Notice[s]" due to a default in payment by Yuntian 4. Orr v. Bank of Am., NT & SA, 285 F.3d 764, 773 (9th Cir. 2002) (stating that documents must be authenticated before they can be admitted); Evans v. Bd. of Educ. Sw. City Sch. Dist.,......
-
Welenco, Inc. v. Corbell, No. 2:13–cv–0287 KJM CKD.
...id. 801(d)(2), because that evidence would not be admissible at trial. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e) ; see also Orr v. Bank of America, 285 F.3d 764, 773 (9th Cir.2002) (evidence must be admissible to be considered at summary judgment).B. Motion to Seal Plaintiffs request to seal several documents......
-
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., No. 06CV2377IEG(NLS).
...of that state's law where the events giving rise to litigation took place within that state's borders. Orr v. Bank of Am., NT & SA, 285 F.3d 764, 772 n. 4 (9th Cir.2002); Offshore Rental, 22 Cal.3d at 168, 148 Cal.Rptr. 867, 583 P.2d 721; Tucci, 89 Cal.App.4th at 193, 107 Cal.Rptr.2d 401. A......
Request a trial to view additional results
2611 cases
-
Meridian Project Systems v. Hardin Const. Co., No. CIVS04-2728 FCD DAD.
...248-49, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). The determination is made based solely upon admissible evidence. Orr v. Bank of America, 285 F.3d 764, 773 (9th Cir.2002). Furthermore, the court must view inferences made from the underlying facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving p......
-
King v. Export Dev. Can. (In re Zetta Jet USA, Inc.), Case No.: 2:17-bk-21386-SK
...rather that Bombardier sent Yuntian 4 three "Termination Notice[s]" due to a default in payment by Yuntian 4. Orr v. Bank of Am., NT & SA, 285 F.3d 764, 773 (9th Cir. 2002) (stating that documents must be authenticated before they can be admitted); Evans v. Bd. of Educ. Sw. City Sch. Dist.,......
-
Welenco, Inc. v. Corbell, No. 2:13–cv–0287 KJM CKD.
...id. 801(d)(2), because that evidence would not be admissible at trial. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e) ; see also Orr v. Bank of America, 285 F.3d 764, 773 (9th Cir.2002) (evidence must be admissible to be considered at summary judgment).B. Motion to Seal Plaintiffs request to seal several documents......
-
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., No. 06CV2377IEG(NLS).
...of that state's law where the events giving rise to litigation took place within that state's borders. Orr v. Bank of Am., NT & SA, 285 F.3d 764, 772 n. 4 (9th Cir.2002); Offshore Rental, 22 Cal.3d at 168, 148 Cal.Rptr. 867, 583 P.2d 721; Tucci, 89 Cal.App.4th at 193, 107 Cal.Rptr.2d 401. A......
Request a trial to view additional results