Orr v. Clyburn, No. 21689
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina |
| Writing for the Court | HARWELL; LEWIS; GREGORY |
| Citation | 290 S.E.2d 804,277 S.C. 536 |
| Parties | , 32 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 203 Robert H. ORR, Jr., Sheriff of Chester County, Individually and as Representative of All Sheriffs of South Carolina, Appellant, v. James E. CLYBURN, Commissioner, South Carolina Commission on Human Affairs, and South Carolina Commission on Human Affairs, an Agency of the State of South Carolina, Respondents. |
| Docket Number | No. 21689 |
| Decision Date | 08 April 1982 |
Page 804
and as Representative of All Sheriffs of South
Carolina, Appellant,
v.
James E. CLYBURN, Commissioner, South Carolina Commission on
Human Affairs, and South Carolina Commission on
Human Affairs, an Agency of the State of
South Carolina, Respondents.
Page 805
[277 S.C. 538] Joseph C. Coleman, Columbia, for appellant.
James W. Rion and Joseph L. Smalls, Jr., Columbia, for respondents.
[277 S.C. 539] HARWELL, Justice:
Appellant initiated this action for declaratory and injunctive relief after respondent notified him that it was processing a charge of discrimination against him. The respondents' demurrer to appellant's complaint was granted on two grounds: that the court had no jurisdiction over the action and that the complaint failed to state a cause of action for declaratory or injunctive relief. We affirm.
On May 21, 1979, Nancy Grant Raines applied to appellant for an appointment as deputy sheriff. Appellant declined to appoint Raines but instead appointed two black males. Thereafter on July 11, 1979, Raines filed with respondent a charge of discrimination against appellant alleging
Page 806
that she had been denied appointment because of her sex and race. (Ms. Raines was female and white). On July 16, 1979, respondent notified appellant of the charge of discrimination. On September 24, 1979, appellant filed his complaint, individually and as representative of all South Carolina sheriffs, asking for a declaration that sheriffs are not subject to the provisions of the South Carolina Human Affairs Law, S.C. Code Ann. § 1-13-10 et seq. and for injunctive relief. He alleged that the respondents' investigation could result in an order of respondent commission requiring him to hire Raines and that he had no adequate remedy at law to prevent respondents from acting further upon Raines' complaint and ordering him to hire her as one of his deputies.We agree with the trial court and adopt its order in substantial part.
We take judicial notice that S.C. Code Ann. § 1-13-90(d)(14), alleged by appellant as the source of respondents' power to order him to hire the applicant, is no longer in force. S.C. Code Ann. § 1-13-10 et seq. was amended on March 22, 1979. The present provisions of the Human Affairs Law dealing with counties and their subdivisions or departments, S.C. Code Ann. § 1-13-90(d) et seq., do not provide for any order of the respondent compelling appellant to hire a successful charging party. Therefore, appellant's[277 S.C. 540] allegation that he could be irreparably harmed if respondent were to order him to hire Raines is moot. His other allegation of irreparable injury, that respondent was currently engaged in investigating him, is without merit. This investigation cannot result in any direct harm to the appellant other than inconvenience.
The inconvenience of a government investigation does not constitute irreparable injury; it is merely part of the burden of living under government; it is not the kind of impending danger for which declaratory and injunctive relief are intended and is not an appropriate question for judicial determination. Bradley Lumber Company of Arkansas v. National Labor Relations Board, 84 F.2d 97 (5th Cir. 1936); Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al., 50 F.Supp. 434 (D.C.1943).
This is the first case decided under the Human Affairs Law as amended. S.C. Code Ann. § 1-13-100, however, specifies that the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc, No. 81-1578
...807, 379 A.2d 790, 793 (1977); Snell v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., --- Mont. ----, ----, 643 P.2d 841, 844 (Mont.1982); Orr v. Clyburn, 277 S.C. 536, 539, 290 S.E.2d 804, 806 (S.C.1982); Albertson's, Inc. v. Washington State Human Rights Comm'n, 14 Wash.App. 697, 699-700, 544 P.2d 98, 10......
-
Ferguson v. Waffle House, Inc., Civil Action No. 9:12–1740–SB.
...claims, the analytical framework for considering these claims under SCHAL is the same as that for Title VII. See Orr v. Clyburn, 277 S.C. 536, 290 S.E.2d 804, 806 (1982) ; Tyndall v. National Education Centers, 31 F.3d 209 (4th Cir.1994) ; S.C.Code Ann. & 1–13–10 et al. (2003); cf. Cromer v......
-
Robinson v. BGM Am., Inc., Civil Action No.: 4:11–3459–MGL.
...30–1. The undersigned agrees. See Gilchrist v. Parth's Inc., No. C/A 4:10–3034–JMC, 2011 WL 6842992 (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 2011); Orr v. Clyburn, 277 S.C. 536, 290 S.E.2d 804, 806 (1982) (noting SCHAL essentially follows the substantive structure of Title VII and that cases interpreting Title VII ......
-
Eagle Container v. County of Newberry, No. 4037.
...controversy is a real and substantial controversy which is ripe and appropriate for judicial determination. . . ." Orr v. Clyburn, 277 S.C. 536, 542, 290 S.E.2d 804, 807 (1982) (citing Notios Corp. v. Hanvey, 256 S.C. 275, 182 S.E.2d 55 (1971)); see also Waters v. South Carolina Land Resour......
-
Robinson v. BGM Am., Inc., Civil Action No.: 4:11–3459–MGL.
...30–1. The undersigned agrees. See Gilchrist v. Parth's Inc., No. C/A 4:10–3034–JMC, 2011 WL 6842992 (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 2011); Orr v. Clyburn, 277 S.C. 536, 290 S.E.2d 804, 806 (1982) (noting SCHAL essentially follows the substantive structure of Title VII and that cases interpreting Title VII ......
-
Eagle Container v. County of Newberry, No. 4037.
...controversy is a real and substantial controversy which is ripe and appropriate for judicial determination. . . ." Orr v. Clyburn, 277 S.C. 536, 542, 290 S.E.2d 804, 807 (1982) (citing Notios Corp. v. Hanvey, 256 S.C. 275, 182 S.E.2d 55 (1971)); see also Waters v. South Carolina Land Resour......
-
Fin. Consulting, LLC v. Comm'r of Ins., No. 19070.
...to practice dentistry. We do not believe this option can fairly be categorized as an available administrative remedy.”); Orr v. Clyburn, 277 S.C. 536, 541–42, 290 S.E.2d 804 (1982) (The court dismissed a declaratory judgment action challenging the Human Rights Commission's “preliminary admi......
-
Ferguson v. Waffle House, Inc., Civil Action No. 9:12–1740–SB.
...claims, the analytical framework for considering these claims under SCHAL is the same as that for Title VII. See Orr v. Clyburn, 277 S.C. 536, 290 S.E.2d 804, 806 (1982); Tyndall v. National Education Centers, 31 F.3d 209 (4th Cir.1994); S.C.Code Ann. & 1–13–10 et al. (2003); cf. Cromer v. ......