Ortman v. Streeter
Decision Date | 12 December 1941 |
Docket Number | No. 1568.,1568. |
Citation | 23 A.2d 189 |
Parties | ORTMAN et al. v. STREETER. |
Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
Certified from Superior Court, Providence and Bristol Counties.
Bill in equity by Carla Ortman and others against Bertha E. Streeter for the construction of certain portions of a will. The cause was certified to the Supreme Court.
Decree in accordance with opinion.
J. Raymond Dubee and Francis J. O'Brien, both of Providence, for complainants.
Voigt, Wright & Clason and John J. McGrane, all of Providence, for respondent.
This is a bill in equity brought in the superior court for the construction of certain portions of the will of Jeannette W. M. Smith. The cause was certified to this court pursuant to the provisions of general laws 1938, chapter 545, § 7.
The bill also contains certain other prayers for removal of cloud on title to certain real estate therein described. The statute under which this cause was certified provides a direct and simple procedure for the construction of a will by a bill in equity for that purpose only. Maddalena v. Masso, 48 R.I. 92, 135 A. 601; Newport Hospital v. Harvey, 47 R.I. 382, 133 A. 648. However, notwithstanding the other abovementioned prayers, a fair reading of the bill shows that it is one primarily for the construction of a will. Therefore, we will treat the prayers for removal of cloud on title as surplusage and consider the cause as one solely for the construction of a will. Horton v. Horton, 46 R. I. 492, 129 A. 499. See Gould v. Trenberth, 59 R.I. 220, 194 A. 736.
The record before us shows the following facts. The complainants are twenty-eight heirs at law of Jeannette W. M. Smith. The respondent is the grantee of certain described real estate on Olney avenue in the town of North Providence by deed to her from Sheffield Smith, husband of Jeannette W. M. Smith. The real estate here in question was devised in the will of Mrs. Smith, dated December 6, 1906, as follows:
Joseph W. Smith, the brother of Sheffield Smith, died January 31, 1931, a widower and without issue; Jeannette W. M. Smith died April 3, 1937; and her husband, Sheffield Smith, died August 15, 1937. On April 19, 1937, Sheffield Smith conveyed the property described in this bill to the respondent, Bertha E. Streeter. It is admitted that she paid nothing for the property and that such conveyance to her "was a pure gift". There is also considerable testimony establishing the close friendship of the respondent with Jeannette W. M. Smith and Sheffield Smith.
The record before us further shows that Jeannette W. M. Smith, Sheffield Smith and Joseph W. Smith executed their respective wills on December 6, 1906. The wills of Jeannette W. M. Smith and Sheffield Smith are reciprocally identical in all details, and in each Joseph W. Smith is named residuary devisee and legatee. Sheffield Smith is the sole beneficiary and executor under the will of Joseph W. Smith. This will further provides that if Sheffield Smith died before the testator, Jeannette W. M. Smith was to be substituted in all particulars in his place and stead.
In the instant cause we are asked to construe clauses fourth, fifth and sixth of the will of ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
King v. Bankerd
...upon Collins v. Streitz, 95 F.2d 430 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 608, 59 S.Ct. 67, 83 L.Ed. 387 (1938), and Ortman v. Streeter, 67 R.I. 325, 23 A.2d 189 (1941), is misplaced. Contrary to King's view, Collins does not state that an attorney in fact can never make a gift of the princip......
-
Town Of Bristol v. Nolan, 1740.
...cause as certified under § 7; and we shall treat this proceeding accordingly. Horton v. Horton, 46 R.I. 492, 129 A. 499; Ortman v. Streeter, 67 R.I. 325, 23 A.2d 189. Five questions appear in the certification as made upon the motion of the complainant, and these will be quoted as they are ......
-
City of Providence v. Powers
...disregarded such other allegations and prayers as surplusage. Town of Bristol v. Nolan, 72 R.I. 460, 465, 53 A.2d 466; Ortman v. Streeter, 67 R.I. 325, 326, 23 A.2d 189; Horton v. Horton, 46 R.I. 492, 495, 129 A. 499. See also Smith v. Powers, R.I., 117 A.2d 844. We shall follow that proced......