Osborne v. McWilliams Dredging Co., Inc.
| Decision Date | 07 March 1938 |
| Docket Number | 34668 |
| Citation | Osborne v. McWilliams Dredging Co., Inc., 180 So. 481, 189 La. 670 (La. 1938) |
| Court | Louisiana Supreme Court |
| Parties | OSBORNE v. McWILLIAMS DREDGING CO., Inc., et al |
Lewis R. Graham and Harry R. Cabral, both of New Orleans, for relator.
Rosen Kammer, Wolff & Farrar, of New Orleans, for respondents.
OPINION
This is a suit by Mrs. Earlene Osborne, widow of Leslie Osborne, for compensation for his death, alleged to have been caused by accidental drowning, while in the employment of the McWilliams Dredging Company, Inc.
The suit was brought in the civil district court for the parish of Orleans against defendant company and its insurance carrier, the American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, and judgment was prayed for against defendants in the sum of $ 5,950, in solido, together with interest on that amount from February 2, 1936, until paid, and forall costs of suit.
Plaintiff's suit was dismissed in the civil district court for the parish of Orleans on an exception of no right or cause of action, and, on appeal by plaintiff, the judgment of the lower court was affirmed by the Court of Appeal for the parish of Orleans.176 So. 410, 412.
The case is now before us under a writ of certiorari herein granted.
An original petition and three supplemental petitions were filed in this case by plaintiff.Exceptions of no cause or right of action were pleaded against the original petition, and against the original petition, as amended.
In the original petition it is alleged:
An exception of no right or cause of action was pleaded by defendants against the original petition, which was permitted by the trial judge to be amended as to paragraph 6, as follows:
"That on the morning of February 2, 1936, shortly after his shift of employment on defendant's dredge was completed, her said husband embarked on a boat owned and operated by Clyde Barrow, for the purpose of going to his home, which was on the other side of Lake Dauterive, and at the time of the collision, described in the original petition herein, the said boat had just left the dredge and was only a few hundred feet from the shore of Lake Dauterive where the defendant's dredge was located."
Plaintiff also filed the following supplemental petition:
(1)The Court of Appeal has maintained the exception of no right or cause of action in this case mainly upon the allegation, as stated in its opinion:
"'(1) That the employees * * * were expected to stay on the said dredge, when not actively at work.'"
The full allegation made by plaintiff in paragraph 4 of the original petition is:
"That the employees of said Dredge were expected to stay on the said dredge, when not actively at work; the McWilliams Company furnished them with quarters and board thereon but allowed them...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Banks v. Associated Indemnity Corporation
... ... ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION et al. TRAVELERS INS. CO ... BANKS et al ... No. 11822 ... Circuit Court of ... Frank Lynn Grocery Company, Inc. The Neighbors car was covered by a policy of general ... 83; Baker v. Colbert, 17 La.App. 518, 136 So. 210; Osborne v. McWilliams Dredging Co., La.App., 176 So. 410, Id., 189 ... ...
-
Banks v. Travelers Ins. Co.
...and the well considered case of Baker v. Colbert, 17 La.App. 518, 136 So. 210, in which many cases are reviewed; Osborne v. McWilliams Dredging Co., 189 La. 670, 180 So. 481; Rogers v. Mengel Co., 189 La. 723, 180 So. With respect to the plea of estoppel, based on the contention that, origi......
-
Carter v. Lanzetta
...Garic v. Garic, 14 La.App. 585, 130 So. 563; Favre v. Werk Press Cloth Mfg. Co., Inc. (La.App.) 152 So. 694; Osborne v. McWilliams Dredging Company, 189 La. 670, 180 So. 481 and Simmons v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (La.App.) 185 So.2d 822. Indeed, it is well settled that, under excep......
-
Tate v. Gullett Gin Co.
...discretion * * * allow amendments of the petition and answer at any stage of the proceedings', LSA-R.S. 23:1315; Osborne v. McWilliams Dredging Co., 189 La. 670, 180 So. 481, Clark v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., La.App. 1 Cir., 27 So.2d 464. 'Amendments are permissible at any stag......