Osbourne v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co

Citation389 U.S. 579,88 S.Ct. 692,19 L.Ed.2d 779
Decision Date01 October 1967
Docket NumberNo. 768,768
PartiesEdmund D. OSBOURNE et al. v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO. et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

See 390 U.S. 975, 88 S.Ct. 1024.

John L. Laubach, Jr., for appellants Osbourne and others.

Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moerman, J. Raymond Clark and James M. Henderson, for appellees Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. and others.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn, for appellees United States and others.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and judgment is affirmed without prejudice to the presentation of an appropriate motion in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for a modification of the injunction.

To continue reading

Request your trial
44 cases
  • Haverhill Manor, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public Welfare
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 4, 1975
    ...v. Board of Educ., 352 Mass. 693, 701, 227 N.E.2d 729 (1967), app. dism. for want of a substantial Federal question, 389 U.S. 572, 88 S.Ct. 692, 19 L.Ed.2d 778 (1968). As we held previously (p. 186) the offset decision is not a regulation subject to hearing and appeal under G.L. c. 30A, §§ ......
  • Buckner Trucking, Inc. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • February 23, 1973
    ...Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States, 275 F.Supp. 98 (W.D.Tex.1967) (three-judge court), aff'd per curiam, 389 U.S. 569, 88 S.Ct. 692, 19 L.Ed.2d 779 (1968). In view of the existing circumstances in this case, the dismissal of the petitions was not arbitrary or otherwise beyond the am......
  • Union Mechling Corp. v. United States, Civ. A. No. 73-956.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • November 26, 1974
    ...(APA), § 8(a), 5 U.S.C. § 557(b); Braswell Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States, 275 F.Supp. 98 (W.D. Tex.1967) aff'd 389 U.S. 569, 88 S.Ct. 692, 19 L.Ed.2d 779, rehearing denied 390 U.S. 975, 88 S.Ct. 1025, 19 L.Ed.2d 1194 (1968). To put it another way, the mere fact that the Commiss......
  • School Committee of Springfield v. Board of Ed.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • September 7, 1972
    ... ... he placed the following notation next to Springfield's line: 'Springfield not in compliance with the provisions of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT