Ostano Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Systems, Inc.
Decision Date | 29 April 1986 |
Docket Number | D,No. 633,633 |
Parties | Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,103 OSTANO COMMERZANSTALT and Dr. Herbert Jovy, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TELEWIDE SYSTEMS, INC., and Bernard L. Schubert, Defendants-Appellants. ocket 85-7415. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Thomas R. Newman, Siff & Newman, P.C., New York City (Joann R. Blasberg, of counsel), for defendants-appellants.
William M. Barron, Walter, Conston & Schurtman, P.C., New York City (Jeff V. Nelson, Nathaniel D. Chapman, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellees.
Before OAKES, KEARSE and PIERCE, Circuit Judges.
After oral argument before this court on December 16, 1985, but prior to issuance of an opinion, defendants-appellants Telewide Systems, Inc., and Bernard L. Schubert each filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Nos. 86-48 and 86-49). In a letter to the Clerk of this court dated March 4, 1986, counsel for appellees stated that "the filing of these reorganization proceedings by appellants does not constitute ... a stay of the decision of the Court of Appeals, and bankruptcy counsel for the appellants has confirmed to me his agreement on this point." We disagree and order this proceeding stayed, without prejudice to the rights of the parties to apply to the bankruptcy court for relief from the provisions of section 362(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. Sec. 362(a)(1) (1982 & Supp. II 1984).
Under section 362(a)(1) a petition in bankruptcy operates to stay the "continuation ... of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was ... commenced before the commencement of the [bankruptcy proceeding]." 11 U.S.C. Sec. 362(a)(1). The stay is automatic and mandatory with the filing of the petition, see Cathey v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 711 F.2d 60, 62 (6th Cir.1983), and therefore a motion for a stay need not be made in this court or the bankruptcy court. See 2 Collier on Bankruptcy p 362.03 (L.King 15th ed. 1985) (stay effective on date of filing). Since the purpose of the stay is to protect creditors as well as the debtor, the debtor may not waive the automatic stay. See Association of St. Croix Condominium Owners v. St. Croix Hotel Corp., 682 F.2d 446, 448 (3d Cir.1982).
An appeal is indisputably a continuation of a judicial action or proceeding, see Cathey, 711 F.2d at 61, and therefore this action is automatically stayed if it is one "against the debtor." We agree with the decisions and reasoning of the United States Courts of Appeals for the Third and Sixth Circuits that whether an action is "against the debtor" is determined by examining the debtor's status at the time proceedings were initiated, and not by looking to which party has appealed. See id. at 61-62; St. Croix Hotel Corp., 682 F.2d at 449. Therefore, although the debtor is currently the appellant, this action is stayed because it was originally brought "against the debtor."
Relief from the effect of the automatic stay provisions...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Capgro Leasing Associates
...and immediate. Id.; Balaber-Strauss v. Reichard (In re Tampa Chain Co.), 835 F.2d 54, 55 (2d Cir.1987); Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Sys., Inc., 790 F.2d 206, 207 (2d Cir.1986) ("The stay is automatic and mandatory with the filing of the petition. . . .") (citing Cathey v. Johns-Manville Sale......
-
Autoskill Inc. v. National Educational Support Systems, Inc., 92-2118
...Ingersoll-Rand Fin. Corp. v. Miller Mining Co., 817 F.2d 1424, 1426-27 (9th Cir.1987) (staying appeal); Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Sys., Inc., 790 F.2d 206, 207-08 (2d Cir.1986) (same); Cathey v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 711 F.2d 60, 62 (6th Cir.1983) St. Croix does not support NESS' mot......
-
Shah v. Glendale Federal Bank
...(Koolik v. Markowitz (2d Cir.1994) 40 F.3d 567, 568; In re Berry Estates (2d Cir.1987) 812 F.2d 67, 71; Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Systems, Inc. (2d Cir.1986) 790 F.2d 206, 207; Maritime Elec. Co., Inc. v. United Jersey Bank (3d Cir.1992) 959 F.2d 1194, 1203-1205, 1208, fn. 14; Assoc. of St......
-
In re Ace Track Co.
...Carolina Internet Ltd. , 661 F.3d 495, 497 (10th Cir.2011) (noting that nine other circuits hold this way); Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Sys., Inc. , 790 F.2d 206, 207 (2d Cir.1986) ; Assoc. of St. Croix Cond. Owners v. St. Croix Hotel Corp. , 682 F.2d 446, 448 (3d Cir.1982) ; see also In re ......
-
The Last Estop: Why Judicial Estoppel Should Be a Court's Last Resort for Undisclosed Lawsuits from Bankruptcy
...relief from the stay . . . for cause . . . .").71. See supra note 30 and accompanying text.72. See Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Sys., Inc., 790 F.2d 206, 207 (2d Cir. 1986) (per curiam) ("Since the purpose of the stay is to protect creditors as well as the debtor, the debtor may not waive the......
-
Putting With a Pitching Wedge: Indiscriminating Termination of the Automatic Stay
...the debtor's estate, and by ensuring an equitable distribution of the debtor's estate.") (quoting Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Sys., Inc., 790 F.2d 206, 207 (2d Cir. 1986) (per curiam)). 27. See H.R. Rep. No. 95-595, at 340 (1977), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5963, 6313.28. Confusingly, Se......
-
The Alteration of Ex Ante Agreements by the Bankruptcy Code.
...Id. (345) Maritime Elec. Co., Inc. v. United Jersey Bank, 959 F.2d 1194, 1204 (3rd Cir. 1991) (citing Commerzanstalt v. Tekwide Sys., 790 F.2d 206, 207 (2d (346) Id. (quoting Martin-Trigona v. Champion Fed. Sav. & Loan Assoc., 892 F.2d 575, 577 (7th Cir. 1989)). (347) Federal Arbitratio......
-
Waiving (some Of) Your Bankruptcy Rights Before You File- Should You Be Worried?
...the automatic stay because its purpose is to protect creditors as well as the debtor. Ostano Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Systems, Inc., 790 F.2d 206 (2d Cir. 1986). The court cited Association of St. Croix Condominium Owners v. St. Croix Hotel Corporation, 6682 F.2d 446 (3d Cir. 1982). 11. I......