Oswald v. American Nat. Can Co., A89A2176
| Decision Date | 02 March 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. A89A2176,A89A2176 |
| Parties | OSWALD v. AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN COMPANY. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
S. Robert Hahn, Jr., Atlanta, for appellant.
Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Dara L. Dehaven, E.A. Simpson, Jr., Bret J. Pangborn, Frederick A. Stuart, Atlanta, for appellee.
Until February 28, 1987, appellant-plaintiff was employed by appellee-defendant. Although Federal law required that appellee furnish appellant a W-2 form by January 31, 1988, she did not receive such a form from appellee by that date. Alleging that appellee had willfully refused to provide the W-2 form to her in a timely manner, appellant filed suit. According to appellant's complaint, appellee's alleged willful refusal constituted "the violation of a legal duty owed to [her], which supports a tort action under the laws of the State of Georgia." Appellee answered appellant's complaint and subsequently moved for summary judgment. Appellant appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee.
The only "duty" to provide a timely W-2 form to appellant is that which is imposed upon appellee by the Federal Internal Revenue Code. The willful breach of that duty can result in criminal liability. 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 6674, 7204. "[T]he violation of a penal statute does not automatically give rise to a civil cause of action on the part of one who is injured thereby." Sparks v. Thurmond, 171 Ga.App. 138, 142(5), 319 S.E.2d 46 (1984). An employer's alleged willful breach of the penal provisions of the Federal Internal Revenue Code regarding the timely provision of a W-2 form will not support an employee's civil action for damages. Turner v. Unification Church, 473 F.Supp. 367, 376(19) (D.R.I.1978), aff'd 602 F.2d 458 (1st Cir.1979). Accordingly, the trial court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of appellee.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
American General Life and Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ward
...law, the violation of a criminal statute "does not automatically give rise to a civil cause of action." Oswald v. Am. Nat'l Can Co., 194 Ga.App. 882, 883, 392 S.E.2d 26, 27 (1990). Instead, where a criminal statute evidences no intent to create a private cause of action, civil liability "mu......
-
Anthony v. Am. Gen. Financial Serv. Inc
...the proceeds of payment for the purpose of improving certain real property for certain other purposes); Oswald v. American Nat. Can Co., 194 Ga.App. 882, 883, 392 S.E.2d 26 (1990) (willful failure to provide W-2, which can result in criminal liability, does not create private cause of actio......
-
Stroman v. Bank of Am. Corp.
...law,’ if any.” E.g., Am. Gen. Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ward, 509 F.Supp.2d 1324, 1330 (N.D.Ga.2007) (citing Oswald v. Am. Nat'l Can Co., 194 Ga.App. 882, 392 S.E.2d 26, 27 (1990) and Rolleston v. Huie, 198 Ga.App. 49, 400 S.E.2d 349, 351 (1990)); Georgia ex rel. Saunders v. Mortg. Electronic......
-
Stone v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, N.A., CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-00081-RWS
...of action.' " Am. Gen. Life and Accident Ins. Co. v. Ward, 509 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1330 (N.D. Ga. 2007) (quoting Oswald v. Am. Nat'l Can Co., 392 S.E.2d 26, 27 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)). For there to be civil liability under a criminal statute, the statute must evidence intent to create a private ......
-
Torts - Cynthia Trimboli Adams and Charles R. Adams, Iii
...of a criminal statute. See Cechman v. Travis, 202 Ga. App. 255, 256, 414 S.E.2d 282, 284 (1991); Oswald v. American Nat'l Can Co., 194 Ga. App. 882, 883, 392 S.E.2d 26,27 (1990); Sparks v. Thurmond, 171 Ga. App. 138,142, 319 S.E.2d 46, 50 (1984). In Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 231 Ga. 6......