Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc., 96-30654
| Decision Date | 06 November 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. 96-30654,96-30654 |
| Citation | 112 F.3d 787 |
| Parties | 73 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1088, 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 416, 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2774 Dolores M. OUBRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Summary Calendar |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Barbara Gale Haynie, Metairie, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
James Martin McGrew, New Orleans, LA, Renee Williams Masinter, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Ginger Berrigan, Judge.
Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
Dolores M. Oubre appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of her employer, Entergy Operations, Inc., in her age discrimination action.
We have reviewed the record and the parties' briefs and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for the reasons enunciated by the district court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc.
...on a case implicating these issues. See Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc., 1996 WL 902063, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 748, aff'd, 112 F.3d 787 (5th Cir.1996), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 1466, 137 L.Ed.2d 680 The only precedent in this district is Hodge v. New York College of Podiatri......
-
Oubre v. Entergy Operations Inc.
...monies and relying on ratification. This Court ought not to open the door to an evasion of the statute by this device. Pp. ___-___. 112 F.3d 787 (C.A.5 1996), reversed and KENNEDY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STEVENS, O'CONNOR, SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined.......
-
Settlements
...former employer, thus agreeing with the employer’s arguments under state contract and common law. See Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc., 112 F.3d 787 (5th Cir. 1996), rev’d 522 U.S. 422 (1998). The Supreme Court reversed, stating that under §7(f)(1) of the ADEA: [T]he employee’s mere retent......