Ouradnik v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation
| Docket Number | 20190293 |
| Decision Date | 12 February 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
Grove v. Dep't of Transp.
...103 of the North Dakota Rules of Evidence governs the preservation of issues on appeal from administrative hearings." Ouradnik v. Henke , 2020 ND 39, ¶ 12, 938 N.W.2d 392 (citing May v. Sprynczynatyk , 2005 ND 76, ¶ 24, 695 N.W.2d 196 ). "To preserve a claim of error under Rule 103, a party......
-
Schwindt v. Sorel
...decision to admit or exclude evidence will not be reversed on appeal unless the hearing officer abused her discretion. Ouradnik v. Henke , 2020 ND 39, ¶ 19, 938 N.W.2d 392. An abuse of discretion occurs if a hearing officer acts in an arbitrary, unreasonable, or unconscionable manner, or th......
-
Christianson v. Henke
...for an abuse of discretion. Id. [¶8] "Before documentary evidence is admissible, it must be authenticated." Ouradnik v. Henke , 2020 ND 39, ¶ 20, 938 N.W.2d 392 (quoting Frost v. N.D. Dep't of Transp. , 487 N.W.2d 6, 8 (N.D. 1992) ). Authentication requires evidence sufficient to support a ......
-
Hewitt v. Henke
...for an abuse of discretion. Jangula , at ¶ 8. [¶9] Documentary evidence must be authenticated before it is admissible. Ouradnik v. Henke , 2020 ND 39, ¶ 20, 938 N.W.2d 392. Authentication requires evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item in question is what the proponent claim......
Get Started for Free