Outlaw v. Nat'l Council

• Decision Date: 24 May 1916
• Docket Number: (No. 9393.)
• Parties: OUTLAW. v. NATIONAL COUNCIL, JUNIOR ORDER UNITED AMERICAN MECHANICS, et al.
• Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

88 S.E. 801

OUTLAW.
v.
NATIONAL COUNCIL, JUNIOR ORDER UNITED AMERICAN MECHANICS, et al.

(No. 9393.)

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

May 24, 1916.

[88 S.E. 801]

Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Kershaw County; I. W. Bowman, Judge.

Action by Eunice Outlaw against the National Council, Junior Order United American Mechanics, and De Kalb Council, No. 112, Junior Order United American Mechanics. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants served notice of intention to appeal. On motion to dismiss appeal from an order refusing to approve defendants' proposed case and extending time for settlement. Case remanded to trial court for settlement,

B. B. Clarke, of Camden, and Douglas & Douglas, of Winnsboro, for appellants.

W. B. De Loach, of Camden, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. [1] The order extending the time within which to perfect the appeal was within the discretion of the trial judge, and not appealable at this time.

Inasmuch as there is some confusion in the minds of attorneys as to the proper practice in the preparation of appeals, it is well to say: The appellant serves his proposed case, making a narrative statement of so much of the testimony as may be pertinent to the appeal, where it can be done. If the...