Overman v. Wilkinson, 17144.

Decision Date22 July 1958
Docket NumberNo. 17144.,17144.
Citation256 F.2d 58
PartiesMark Lee OVERMAN, Appellant, v. F. T. WILKINSON, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Mark Lee Overman, in pro. per.

James W. Dorsey, U. S. Atty., Ralph Ivey, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a petition for habeas corpus on the ground that petitioner's remedy was by motion under Sec. 2255, 28 U.S.C.A. in the court which had sentenced him.

The record discloses that this is appellant's second petition for habeas corpus. His first petition was denied with the suggestion that the petitioner's remedy was by a Section 2255 motion in the sentencing court, and petitioner filed such a motion. This motion denied, he did not appeal and seems now to be reapplying for habeas corpus relief on the ground that he is entitled to do so since he did not get the relief he asked from the sentencing court. The law is otherwise declared.1

The judgment dismissing his petition was right, and it is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Rawls v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri
    • 30 December 1964
    ...1957, 242 F.2d 870, cert. denied 354 U.S. 924, 77 S.Ct. 1385, 1 L.Ed.2d 1438 (cited in our Anderson opinion, supra); Overman v. Wilkinson, 5th Cir. 1958, 256 F.2d 58; Moore v. Taylor, 10th Cir. 1961, 289 F.2d 450, cert. denied 368 U.S. 853, 82 S.Ct. 90, 7 L.Ed.2d 51; Burdette v. Settle, 8th......
  • Birchfield v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 17 November 1961
    ...2 L.Ed. 2d 820; Neigut v. Kearney, 5 Cir., 1955, 221 F.2d 803, cert. den., 350 U.S. 939, 76 S.Ct. 311, 100 L.Ed. 819; Overman v. Wilkinson, 5 Cir., 1958, 256 F.2d 58, cert. den., 358 U.S. 887, 79 S.Ct. 129, 3 L.Ed.2d 115; Smith v. Reid, D.C.Cir., 1951, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 272, 191 F.2d 491. The......
  • Overman v. United States, 7361.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 13 September 1963
    ...petitioner sought habeas corpus relief which was denied on the ground that his remedy was under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Overman v. Wilkinson, 5 Cir., 256 F.2d 58, certiorari denied 358 U.S. 887, 79 S.Ct. 129, 3 L.Ed.2d 115. Later the sentencing court denied § 2255 relief and its action was affirm......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT