Overton v. New York, 212

Decision Date28 October 1968
Docket NumberNo. 212,212
Citation21 L.Ed.2d 218,89 S.Ct. 252,393 U.S. 85
PartiesCarlos OVERTON v. NEW YORK
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Melvin L. Wulf and David C. Gilberg, for petitioner.

Carl A. Vergari and James J. Duggan, for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Bumper v. State of North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 88 S.Ct. 1788, 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968).

Mr. Justice BLACK dissents and would affirm the judgment of conviction. here.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • State In Interest of T.L.O.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • August 8, 1983
    ...arisen. Cf. People v. Overton, 20 N.Y.2d 360, 362, 283 N.Y.S.2d 22, 24, 229 N.E.2d 596, 598 (N.Y.Ct.App.1967), vacated, 393 U.S. 85, 89 S.Ct. 252, 21 L.Ed.2d 218 (1968), adhered to, 24 N.Y.2d 522, 301 N.Y.S.2d 479, 249 N.E.2d 366 (N.Y.Ct.App.1969) (vice-principal had occasionally inspected ......
  • Hoover v. Beto
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • December 18, 1972
    ...1971, 401 U.S. 646, 91 S.Ct. 1148, 28 L.Ed.2d 388 (announcing the standard of retroactivity). Moreover, in Overton v. New York, 1968, 393 U.S. 85, 89 S.Ct. 252, 21 L.Ed.2d 218 the Supreme Court remanded a case involving a pre-Bumper search for reconsideration in light of Bumper. The distric......
  • Byars v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 2, 1976
    ...coercion. Where there is coercion there cannot be consent.' Id. at 550, 88 S.Ct. at 1792. See also Overton v. New York, 393 U.S. 85, 89 S.Ct. 252, 21 L.Ed.2d 218 (1968) (per curiam). An officer must have a legal basis for obtaining access to private living quarters under the badge of his of......
  • Foster v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • August 28, 1991
    ...duress or coercion, actual or implied. Amos v. United States, 255 U.S. 313, 41 S.Ct. 266, 65 L.Ed. 654 [1921]; Overton v. N.Y., 393 U.S. 85, 89 S.Ct. 252, 21 L.Ed.2d 218 [1968]. The officers in the instant case were in plain clothes and no guns were visible or displayed. No representation w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT