Owens v. Owens
Decision Date | 27 May 1994 |
Citation | 668 So.2d 543 |
Parties | Bobbie Jean OWENS v. Donald Wayne OWENS. AV92000710. |
Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
Appeal from Etowah Circuit Court, No. DR-87-410.01; Roy S. Moore, Judge.
Howard B. Warren, Gadsden, for appellant.
Jack Floyd and Jane V. Floyd of Floyd, Keener, Cusimano & Roberts, Gadsden, for appellee.
The parties divorced in July 1987, after a 30-year marriage. The parties' divorce judgment incorporated an agreement concerning alimony payments to the wife:
On July 30, 1992, the wife filed a petition seeking to modify the final judgment of divorce to continue the alimony payments.
After a hearing, the trial court entered an order on May 7, 1993, stating:
The wife appeals.
The dispositive issue is whether the trial court erred in finding that the agreement of the parties prevailed over the court's authority to modify the alimony provision.
The award of periodic alimony may be modified by the trial court upon the showing of a material change in circumstances. Trammell v. Trammell, 589 So.2d 743 (Ala.Civ.App.1991). However, the burden is on the party seeking modification to show that a material change in circumstances has occurred. Jeffcoat v. Jeffcoat, 423 So.2d 888 (Ala.Civ.App.1982). Further, where an award of periodic alimony is based on an agreement of the parties, as here, such an award should be modified only for clear and sufficient reasons, after close scrutiny. Trammell, supra.
The evidence showed that, pursuant to the agreement, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Owens
...payments shall be at the discretion of the [husband]." The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the trial court's order. Owens v. Owens, 668 So.2d 543 (Ala.Civ.App.1994). We reverse and remand, because the law of Alabama provides that "[w]hen an agreement between the parties provides for the pay......
- Runyans v. Littrell