Owensboro Wagon Co. v. Hall

Citation149 Ala. 210,43 So. 71
PartiesOWENSBORO WAGON CO. v. HALL. HALL v. OWENSBORO WAGON CO.
Decision Date07 February 1907
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

Appeal from City Court of Bessemer; William Jackson, Judge.

Action by the Owensboro Wagon Company against John A. Hall. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals, and defendant takes a cross-appeal. Reversed and remanded.

The complaint was originally on the common counts, and on the second trial was amended by the addition of the sixth and seventh counts, as follows:

"(6) The plaintiff claims of the defendant the sum of ($670.00) six hundred and seventy dollars by reason of a contract in writing as follows:
" 'Owensboro, Ky. 3/7/1901. John A. Hall Bessemer--Dear Sir: Respecting your request to handle our wagons on consignment in Bessemer, Alabama, and vicinity we shall be pleased to commission you as your orders may be approved by us from time to time; proceeds of sale less invoice price, to be your commission. In consideration of our doing so, and extending you this credit, we ask you to undertake and contract as follows:
" 'First. Of all goods, handle and sell ours to the exclusion of all other makes.
" 'Second. Until goods consigned hereunder are sold, diligently to do all business required to sell said goods, pay all taxes, freight, and other expenses of same, keep well housed and protected from the weather and in good order. In case of loss by fire or damage or other cause, pay us invoice price.
" 'Third. On the 1st of each month, and whenever requested to do so by us or our authorized traveling salesmen or collectors, to render a statement of all goods on hand.
" 'Fourth. Invoice prices are to be mutually agreed upon at the time orders are accepted for shipment.
" 'Fifth. For all sales, as soon as made, send us cash less 5%, or your note for four months for the amount from date of sale, with purchaser's note indorsed by you as collateral security, if at any time your account exceeds our limit of credit. The cash discount not to be allowed on sales after 12 months from date of each invoice; all remittances to be at invoice prices.
" 'Sixth. To the extent of invoice price, moneys, proceeds, or securities taken or received by you on account of goods shall be our property, received and held in trust for us and kept by you as separate funds for us until goods are settled for as above, and the title for all goods shipped on this contract shall be and remain in our name, until we receive settlement therefor.
" 'Seventh. You will, if demanded, purchase at invoice price in cash or your four-months note, with interest at 8 per cent. until maturity, with approved collateral notes attached, if requested, all goods unsold after 12 months from date of each invoice, or at once in case you shall sell or dispose of the merchandise business in which you are engaged.
" 'Eighth. We can revoke this contract at any time if you fail to discharge any obligations hereunder, or if we have reason to believe you are unable to perform the same, and upon the return of goods for any cause, termination or revocation of this contract, you will deliver to us in your town all our goods then on hand in as good condition as when received, paying for any damage to same, free of all charge. If, however, termination is made other than by reason of your act or breach, we will pay actual freight, which shall be a claim against us, subject to offset of any claim we may have against you.
" 'Ninth. We deliver all goods free on board, Owensboro, Ky., and will endeavor to ship by cheapest route, making freight as low as possible, but will not be responsible for any other charges.
" 'Tenth. Our failure to enforce at any time any provision of this contract, or our exercising option, hereby conceded, at any time for the time being to waive performance on your part of any of the provisions hereof, shall in no wise impair the validity of this contract or such provision, or our right to enforce the same. If this is satisfactory, please sign as indicated below, and return to us, on receipt of which we will at this office consummate same by our signature as a contract between us, sending you a copy, which embodies our entire understanding and cannot be modified, except by writing duly executed by us. [ Signed] Owensboro Wagon Co., by B. M. Settle.

" 'The above is satisfactory. [ Signed] John A. Hall.'

"And plaintiff avers that it made demand upon the defendant to purchase all the unsold wagons then on hand on, to wit, the 6th day of May, 1902, and the defendant then and there refused to do so.

"(7) Plaintiff as part of this count adopts all the words and figures of the sixth count hereof down to and including the contract between the plaintiff and defendant therein set out, and plaintiff avers that on the 9th day of December, 1901, the plaintiff was informed that defendant had disposed of or sold his mercantile business, and thereafter, to wit, on the 6th day of May, 1902, demanded that the defendant purchase stock of wagons, etc., then in defendant's hands, as is provided for in the seventh paragraph of said contract, and the defendant then and there refused to purchase as provided in paragraph 7 of this contract."

The defendant interposed a motion to strike the last two counts, because they are departures from the original complaint on the common counts, and because the last two amendments fail to aver or show any cause of action, and on various other grounds not necessary to be set out. Demurrers were filed on practically the same grounds. The court granted the motion, and struck the sixth and seventh counts.

The fourth plea filed by defendant sets up the contract set out in the complaint, and avers that the account upon which this suit is founded is for a lot of wagons shipped by plaintiff under the conditions of the contract, and that long before 12 months expired next after the date of shipment of such wagon the defendant resigned his agency under said contract, offered to settle with plaintiff and deliver the unsold wagons to plaintiff at Bessemer, Ala., and informed the plaintiff that the wagons were there subject to his orders. Said plea also contained an offer to settle and return the wagons. The other acts of the court concerning this plea are sufficiently set out in the opinion.

The fifth special plea is as follows: "The defendant says that said contract as set out in the defendant's fourth plea was made and entered into with reference to and because of the fact that the defendant was at that time engaged in a mercantile business, as is shown by said contract in and by section 7 thereof, which provides that the defendant should, if demanded, purchase at invoice price in cash or his four-months note, with interest at 8 per cent., with approved collateral note attached, if requested, all goods unsold after 12 months from date of each invoice, or at once in case he sold or disposed of the mercantile business in which he was engaged. And defendant avers that he disposed of the mercantile business in which he was so engaged by selling the same out in, to wit, the month of June, 1901, and promptly thereafter gave the plaintiff notice of the fact that he had disposed of his said mercantile business, and offered to turn over to plaintiff all the goods and property he had received from and was holding for it under said contract that had not been disposed of, and also offered to turn over to plaintiff, and did turn over to it, all money it was entitled to or that was owing to it for goods of the plaintiff that had been sold by the defendant under said contract, and he repeated such offer and notice several times, which offer defendant avers he is still ready and willing, and hereby offers, to still carry out and perform. And defendant avers that the plaintiff, therefore, had full notice of the fact about the defendant having so disposed of his said business as aforesaid, and that, notwithstanding this, the plaintiff refused or declined to take the goods back, and refused or declined to elect or require the defendant to purchase goods which he so held for the plaintiff under said contract; but, to the contrary, the plaintiff insisted in going on and did go on treating the defendant as its agent under and according to the terms of said contract, and the defendant also accordingly went on as plaintiff's agent, handling its property under said contract. Wherefore defendant avers that plaintiff lost and waived its right to effectually elect, require, or even demand that the defendant purchase said goods or property, or even treat him as a purchaser, and by reason thereof the plaintiff is estopped from demanding or compelling the defendant in any sense to purchase said property or any part thereof."

The following demurrers were interposed to the fifth plea as amended: "Because the plea does not aver that the defendant accepted the agency and acted as such agent. Because under the contract the plaintiff had a right to decline to take the goods back. Because the averments of the plea show that the defendant went on handling the goods, wagons, etc., under the contract, thereby disaffirming the establishment of an agency subsequent to the going out of business by the defendant. Because the facts alleged in said plea are insufficient to show that a new contract had been created by the dealings of the parties subsequent to the selling out by the defendant of its mercantile business."

The defendant filed the following plea as plea 7: "The defendant says that the plaintiff, after the time when the defendant sold and disposed of his mercantile business and offered to return and pay for the goods as set up in the defendant's fifth plea, the plaintiff understanding all the circumstances, treated the defendant as...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Ashurst v. Arnold-Henegar-Doyle Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 23 Marzo 1918
    ...Clark, 136 Ala. 450, 461, 34 So. 917; Mobile Electric Co. v. Sanges, 169 Ala. 341, 349, 53 So. 176, Ann.Cas. 1912B, 461; Owensboro Co. v. Hall, 149 Ala. 210, 43 So. 71; St. Louis Co. v. Phillips, 165 Ala. 504, 51 So. Pleas may be stricken only in the cases specified by the statute. Code, § ......
  • John Dodd Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Burt
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 13 Octubre 1932
    ... ... v. Sanges, 169 Ala ... 341, 349, 53 So. 176, Ann. Cas. 1912B, 461; Owensboro ... Wagon Co. v. Hall, 149 Ala. 210, 43 So. 71; St ... Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Phillips, 165 ... ...
  • Webb Furniture Co, Inc.. v. Everett
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 20 Abril 1932
    ... ... & Co. v. Madden, 165 Ill. 41, 45 N.E. 979; Mahan v ... Smitherman, 71 Ala. 563; Owensboro Wagon Co. v ... Hall, 149 Ala. 210, 43 So. 71; Perley v. Brown, ... 12 N.H. 493; McVicker v ... ...
  • Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Smith
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 1 Junio 1909
    ... ... 841; Troy Grocery Co. v. Potter & ... Wrightington, 139 Ala. 359, 36 So. 12; Owensboro ... Wagon Co. v. Hall, 149 Ala. 210, 34 So. 71; Wefel v ... Stillman, 151 Ala. 249, 44 So ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT