Owusu-Boakye v. Barr
Decision Date | 08 April 2019 |
Docket Number | Case No. 1:18-cv-1344 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia |
Parties | Kofi OWUSU-BOAKYE, Plaintiff, v. William BARR, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Defendants. |
Steffanie Jones Lewis, The International Business Law Firm PC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.
Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., United States Attorney's Office, Alexandria, VA, for Defendants.
This matter arises from the final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") affirming the United States Citizenship & Immigration Services' ("USCIS") decision to deny plaintiff's 1-130 alien relative petition to grant a visa to plaintiff's spouse. In short, BIA and USCIS justified the denial of plaintiff's petition on the ground that there was substantial and probative evidence that plaintiff's spouse had previously entered into a fraudulent marriage for the purpose of evading immigration law and was thus ineligible for an immediate relative visa. In the Amended Complaint, plaintiff has challenged BIA's decision on several grounds, and the parties have each moved for summary judgment on plaintiff's claims.
The Administrative Procedure Act ("APA")1 confines judicial review of agency decisions to the administrative record of proceedings before the pertinent agency. See 5 U.S.C. § 706 ; see also Camp v. Pitts , 411 U.S. 138, 142, 93 S.Ct. 1241, 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973). Put another way, "when a party seeks review of agency action under the APA, the district judge sits as an appellate tribunal." Am. Bioscience, Inc. v. Thompson , 269 F.3d 1077, 1083 (D.C. Cir. 2001). Given the district court's limited role in reviewing the administrative record, courts have noted that the usual summary judgment standard does not apply in cases where a district court exercises review of a final agency action under the APA. See, e.g., Spelman v. McHugh , 65 F.Supp.3d 40, 44 (D.D.C. 2014). The key difference in an APA case is that "all relevant facts are contained in the administrative record for such a case, and, as a result, there are no material facts in dispute." Maine v. Norton , 257 F.Supp.2d 357, 363 (D. Me. 2003). Therefore, in a review of agency action under the APA, "[t]he ‘entire case’ on review is a question of law." Am. Bioscience, Inc. , 269 F.3d at 1083.
The administrative record pertaining to plaintiff's underlying proceedings before BIA and USCIS reflects the following relevant facts.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Parcha v. Cuccinelli
...2008) (same); Wells v. Cuccinelli, No. 4:19-CV-1099-MGL, 2019 WL 2578630, at *6 (D.S.C. June 24, 2019) (same); Owusu-Boakye v. Barr, 376 F. Supp. 3d 663, 678-79 (E.D. Va. 2019) (same); Naiker v. USCIS, 352 F. Supp. 3d 1067, 1076 (W.D. Wash. 2018) (same); Mattson v. Kelly, No. 315-CV-182, 20......
-
Singh v. United States
...that listed and summarized the derogatory information and provided plaintiffs with the opportunity to respond); Owusu-Boakye v. Barr, 376 F.Supp.3d 663, 679 (E.D. Va. 2019) (same), aff'd, 2020 WL 6707333 at fn 2 (4th Cir. Nov. 16, 2020). Thus, courts have held that, "under the regulations, ......
-
Back Bay Restoration Found., Ltd. v. U.S. Army Corps. of Eng'rs
...of the proceeding, the APA "confines judicial review of agency decisions to the administrative record . . . ." Owusu-Boakye v. Barr, 376 F. Supp. 3d 663, 667 (E.D. Va. 2019). Accordingly, in an APA case "all relevant facts are contained in the administrative record for such a case, and, as ......
-
Misseme v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Servs.
... ... 2014) (same); ... Wells v. Cuccinelli , Civ. No. 4:19-1099-MGL, 2019 WL ... 2578630, at *6 (D.S.C. June 24, 2019); Owusu-Boakye v ... Barr , 376 F.Supp.3d 663, 657 (E.D. Va. 2019) ... In this ... case, the NOID sent to Misseme on September ... ...